Literature DB >> 19190321

Radiation protection of patients undergoing cardiac computed tomographic angiography.

Andrew J Einstein.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2009        PMID： 19190321     DOI： 10.1001/jama.2009.53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN： 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


× No keyword cloud information.
  12 in total

1.  DNA double-strand breaks as potential indicators for the biological effects of ionising radiation exposure from cardiac CT and conventional coronary angiography: a randomised, controlled study.

Authors:  Dominik Geisel; Elke Zimmermann; Matthias Rief; Johannes Greupner; Michael Laule; Fabian Knebel; Bernd Hamm; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Use of 100 kV versus 120 kV in cardiac dual source computed tomography: effect on radiation dose and image quality.

Authors:  Ron Blankstein; Michael A Bolen; Rodrigo Pale; Meagan K Murphy; Amar B Shah; Hiram G Bezerra; Ammar Sarwar; Ian S Rogers; Udo Hoffmann; Suhny Abbara; Ricardo C Cury; Thomas J Brady
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Radiation dose reduction in CT coronary angiography.

Authors:  Brian P Shapiro; Phillip M Young; Birgit Kantor; Yeon Hyeon Choe; Cynthia H McCollough; Thomas C Gerber
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Radiation exposure in diagnostic imaging-use, misuse, or abuse? Part I: the background and science of medical radiation.

Authors:  Kim Allan Williams; Kalyani Ballapuram
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Image quality and radiation dose comparison of prospectively triggered low-dose CCTA: 128-slice dual-source high-pitch spiral versus 64-slice single-source sequential acquisition.

Authors:  Jelena R Ghadri; Silke M Küest; Robert Goetti; Michael Fiechter; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Rene N Nkoulou; Felix P Kuhn; Carsten Pietsch; Patrick von Schulthess; Oliver Gaemperli; Christian Templin; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-07-10       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Reducing Ionizing Radiation Associated with Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: An Ultrasound-Guided Approach.

Authors:  Nisha L Bhatia; Arshad Jahangir; William Pavlicek; Luis R P Scott; Gregory T Altemose; Komandoor Srivathsan
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2010-12-15

7.  Off-resonance magnetic resonance angiography improves visualization of in-stent lumen in peripheral nitinol stents compared to conventional T1-weighted acquisitions: an in vitro comparison study.

Authors:  Gitsios Gitsioudis; Philipp Fortner; Matthias Stuber; Anna Missiou; Florian Andre; Oliver J Müller; Hugo A Katus; Grigorios Korosoglou
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures.

Authors:  Reza Fazel; Harlan M Krumholz; Yongfei Wang; Joseph S Ross; Jersey Chen; Henry H Ting; Nilay D Shah; Khurram Nasir; Andrew J Einstein; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Ionizing radiation exposure among kidney transplant recipients due to medical imaging during the pretransplant evaluation.

Authors:  Kim N Nguyen; Anup M Patel; Francis L Weng
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 8.237

10.  Cardiac CT angiography--radiation dose-how effective are we in reducing radiation dose from cardiac CT angiography?

Authors:  Quynh A Truong; Emily Siegel; Christopher P Cannon
Journal:  Rev Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.930
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.