Literature DB >> 19190156

The impact of human papillomavirus information on perceived risk of cervical cancer.

Laura A V Marlow1, Jo Waller, Jane Wardle.   

Abstract

There is a need to develop public education about the link between human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer. Explaining that a sexually transmitted virus causes cervical cancer may affect perceived risk of cervical cancer. We hypothesized that presenting HPV information would have differential effects depending on age and screening attendance. Data were collected during face-to-face interviews with a sample of British women age 16 to 75 years who had not heard of HPV before (n = 965). A repeated measures design was used, assessing perceived risk of cervical cancer before and after providing information about HPV. Perceived risk was assessed using a comparative risk measure with a five-point response scale. Preinformation, the mean perceived risk score was 2.64 (SE, 0.03). Overall, presentation of HPV information did not have an effect on perceived risk of cervical cancer [chi(2)(1) = .72; P = 0.396], but as expected, there was a significant time by age interaction for the change in perceived risk [chi(2)(5) = 33.56; P < 0.001], which increased in the youngest age group (16-25 years) and decreased in the oldest age group (65-75 years). In a separate analysis with women in the screening age range (25-64 years; n = 709), there was a significant time by screening attendance interaction [chi(2)(1) = 5.25; P = 0.022], with an increase in perceived risk among women who did not regularly attend screening. This is the first study to examine the effect of HPV information on perceived risk across different population groups. Interventions to increase awareness of HPV could benefit from tailoring information to prescreening age, screening age, and postscreening age women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19190156      PMCID: PMC2674229          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  19 in total

1.  What does it mean to understand a risk? Evaluating risk comprehension.

Authors:  N D Weinstein
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1999

2.  Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Maria C Katapodi; Kathy A Lee; Noreen C Facione; Marylin J Dodd
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  HPV DNA testing in cervical cancer screening: from evidence to policies.

Authors:  Tom Cox; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2006-08-21       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: the example of vaccination.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Gretchen B Chapman; Frederick X Gibbons; Meg Gerrard; Kevin D McCaul; Neil D Weinstein
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 5.  Epidemiology of genital human papillomavirus infection.

Authors:  L Koutsky
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1997-05-05       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Resistance of personal risk perceptions to debiasing interventions.

Authors:  N D Weinstein; W M Klein
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  A study of sexuality and health among older adults in the United States.

Authors:  Stacy Tessler Lindau; L Philip Schumm; Edward O Laumann; Wendy Levinson; Colm A O'Muircheartaigh; Linda J Waite
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Subjective and objective risk of colorectal cancer (UK).

Authors:  Kathryn A Robb; Anne Miles; Jane Wardle
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  HPV vaccine acceptability in a rural Southern area.

Authors:  Karah I Fazekas; Noel T Brewer; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  The association between knowledge of HPV and feelings of stigma, shame and anxiety.

Authors:  J Waller; L A V Marlow; J Wardle
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 3.519

View more
  11 in total

1.  Evaluating the stage of change model to a cervical cancer screening intervention among Ohio Appalachian women.

Authors:  Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Jill M Oliveri; Gregory S Young; Mira L Katz; Cathy M Tatum; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2015-10-19

2.  Changes in risk perceptions in relation to self-reported colorectal cancer screening among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer cases enrolled in a randomized trial.

Authors:  Beth A Glenn; Alison K Herrmann; Catherine M Crespi; Cynthia M Mojica; L Cindy Chang; Annette E Maxwell; Roshan Bastani
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  Overcoming barriers to HPV vaccination: A randomized clinical trial of a culturally-tailored, media intervention among African American girls.

Authors:  Ralph J DiClemente; Colleen Crittenden Murray; Tracie Graham; Julia Still
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Factors associated with perceived susceptibility to cervical cancer among Latina immigrants in Alabama.

Authors:  Isabel C Garcés-Palacio; Isabel C Scarinci
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-01

5.  A community-based randomized trial of a faith-placed intervention to reduce cervical cancer burden in Appalachia.

Authors:  Christina R Studts; Yelena N Tarasenko; Nancy E Schoenberg; Brent J Shelton; Jennifer Hatcher-Keller; Mark B Dignan
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Psychological impact, support and information needs for women with an abnormal Pap smear: comparative results of a questionnaire in three European countries.

Authors:  Joseph Monsonego; Javier Cortes; Daniel Pereira da Silva; Anna Francisca Jorge; Patrick Klein
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 7.  3. How comprehensive can we be in the economic assessment of vaccines?

Authors:  Baudouin Standaert; Rino Rappuoli
Journal:  J Mark Access Health Policy       Date:  2017-08-31

8.  Increasing the perceived relevance of cervical screening in older women who do not plan to attend screening.

Authors:  Laura A V Marlow; Mairead Ryan; Jo Waller
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.519

9.  Understanding the role of oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) status on adherence behaviors among women with abnormal cervical cytology.

Authors:  Catriona Buick; K Joan Murphy; Doris Howell; Kelly Metcalfe
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  Nutrition Labeling Usage Influences Blood Markers in Body-Size Self-Conscious Individuals: The Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2013-2018.

Authors:  Su Yeon Kye; Kyu-Tae Han; Sung Hoon Jeong; Jin Young Choi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.