Literature DB >> 33461543

Understanding the role of oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) status on adherence behaviors among women with abnormal cervical cytology.

Catriona Buick1, K Joan Murphy2, Doris Howell2, Kelly Metcalfe2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the introduction of oncogenic Human Papillomavirus (HPV) testing into cervical screening there is a renewed focus on primary prevention among high-risk groups. To date, little is known about the effectiveness of this program, and the extent to which individual-level factors, such as psychosocial health and agency, may play a role. In particular, it is unclear if knowledge of one's oncogenic HPV status impacts on adherence behaviors amongst women with screening abnormalities. The purpose of this study was to identify if clinical, demographic or psychosocial factors predict non-adherence with recommended colposcopy follow-up.
METHODS: This prospective pilot study included 145 women referred to a large Toronto colposcopy clinic between December, 2013 and September, 2014. Demographic, clinical and psychosocial characteristics were collected at three points in time: (1) at initial colposcopy consultation; (2) 4-6 weeks following initial consultation, and; (3) at time of follow-up appointment (within 12 months of initial consultation).
RESULTS: Overall, 13% (n = 145) of the women were classified as non-adherent. Older women (OR = 0.73, p < 0.01) and those with higher-grade lesions (OR = 0.10, p < 0.01) were less likely to be non-adherent, whereas current smokers (OR = 22.46, p < 0.01) were more likely to be non-adherent. While not statistically significant, variation in rates of non-adherence amongst the various HPV status groups (untested; 15.3%, HPV positive; 5.3%, HPV negative; 6.7%) warrants further study.
CONCLUSION: Findings of this study indicate that younger women, those with higher-grade lesions and current smokers were more likely to be non-adherent to recommended colposcopy follow-up. While HPV status did not reach statistical significance, the direction of this finding suggests that testing for HPV may have a positive reinforcing role on adherence to follow-up. The direction of this finding warrants further study, and potentially a practical clinical goal as HPV testing for women becomes standard of care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence behaviors; Cervical cancer screening; Cervical screening abnormalities; Colposcopy; Human papillomavirus; Psychosocial health

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33461543      PMCID: PMC7812645          DOI: 10.1186/s12905-020-01168-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Womens Health        ISSN: 1472-6874            Impact factor:   2.809


  44 in total

1.  Dysplasia severity, but not experiences during colposcopy, predicts adherence to follow-up colposcopy.

Authors:  Susanna Kola; Jane C Walsh
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Psychometric properties of the Impact of Event Scale amongst women at increased risk for hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  B Thewes; B Meiser; I B Hickie
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  How are women with high grade Pap smear abnormalities managed? A population based study.

Authors:  Rachel Kupets; Lawrence Paszat
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 4.  Understanding barriers for adherence to follow-up care for abnormal pap tests.

Authors:  Katherine S Eggleston; Ann L Coker; Irene Prabhu Das; Suzanne T Cordray; Kathryn J Luchok
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  The effectiveness of a community outreach intervention to improve follow-up among underserved women at highest risk for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Linda P Engelstad; Susan Stewart; Regina Otero-Sabogal; May S Leung; Patricia I Davis; Rena J Pasick
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Correlation between smoking status and cervical cancer screening: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Shannon D MacLaughlan; Jason A Lachance; Annie Gjelsvik
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 7.  Perceived risk and adherence to breast cancer screening guidelines among women with a familial history of breast cancer: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Meghan J Walker; Anna M Chiarelli; Julia A Knight; Lucia Mirea; Gord Glendon; Paul Ritvo
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 4.380

8.  The impact of human papillomavirus information on perceived risk of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Laura A V Marlow; Jo Waller; Jane Wardle
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  The psychological impact of human papillomavirus testing in women with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic cervical smear test results: 6-month follow-up.

Authors:  E Maissi; T M Marteau; M Hankins; S Moss; R Legood; A Gray
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-03-28       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Colposcopy attendance and deprivation: A retrospective analysis of 27,193 women in the NHS Cervical Screening Programme.

Authors:  E Douglas; J Wardle; N J Massat; J Waller
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Colposcopy non-attendance following an abnormal cervical cancer screening result: a prospective population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Linda A Liang; Sylke R Zeissig; Gunther Schauberger; Sophie Merzweiler; Kathrin Radde; Sabine Fischbeck; Hans Ikenberg; Maria Blettner; Stefanie J Klug
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Understanding HPV-positive women's needs and experiences in relation to patient-provider communication issues: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Kowsar Qaderi; Mehrnaz Geranmayeh; Farnaz Farnam; Shahrzad Sheikh Hasani; Seyedeh Tahereh Mirmolaei
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Depression before and after diagnostic procedures among women with abnormal finding of Papanicolaou screening test.

Authors:  Irena Ilic; Goran Babic; Aleksandra Dimitrijevic; Sandra Sipetic Grujicic; Milena D Ilic
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.711

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.