Literature DB >> 19188593

Scoring diverse cellular morphologies in image-based screens with iterative feedback and machine learning.

Thouis R Jones1, Anne E Carpenter, Michael R Lamprecht, Jason Moffat, Serena J Silver, Jennifer K Grenier, Adam B Castoreno, Ulrike S Eggert, David E Root, Polina Golland, David M Sabatini.   

Abstract

Many biological pathways were first uncovered by identifying mutants with visible phenotypes and by scoring every sample in a screen via tedious and subjective visual inspection. Now, automated image analysis can effectively score many phenotypes. In practical application, customizing an image-analysis algorithm or finding a sufficient number of example cells to train a machine learning algorithm can be infeasible, particularly when positive control samples are not available and the phenotype of interest is rare. Here we present a supervised machine learning approach that uses iterative feedback to readily score multiple subtle and complex morphological phenotypes in high-throughput, image-based screens. First, automated cytological profiling extracts hundreds of numerical descriptors for every cell in every image. Next, the researcher generates a rule (i.e., classifier) to recognize cells with a phenotype of interest during a short, interactive training session using iterative feedback. Finally, all of the cells in the experiment are automatically classified and each sample is scored based on the presence of cells displaying the phenotype. By using this approach, we successfully scored images in RNA interference screens in 2 organisms for the prevalence of 15 diverse cellular morphologies, some of which were previously intractable.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19188593      PMCID: PMC2634799          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0808843106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  33 in total

Review 1.  Gene expression and the myth of the average cell.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Levsky; Robert H Singer
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 20.808

2.  Dynamic proteomics in individual human cells uncovers widespread cell-cycle dependence of nuclear proteins.

Authors:  Alex Sigal; Ron Milo; Ariel Cohen; Naama Geva-Zatorsky; Yael Klein; Inbal Alaluf; Naamah Swerdlin; Natalie Perzov; Tamar Danon; Yuvalal Liron; Tal Raveh; Anne E Carpenter; Galit Lahav; Uri Alon
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Compound classification using image-based cellular phenotypes.

Authors:  Cynthia L Adams; Vadim Kutsyy; Daniel A Coleman; Ge Cong; Anne Moon Crompton; Kathleen A Elias; Donald R Oestreicher; Jay K Trautman; Eugeni Vaisberg
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 4.  Image-based chemical screening.

Authors:  Anne E Carpenter
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 15.040

5.  Cellular phenotype recognition for high-content RNA interference genome-wide screening.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Xiaobo Zhou; Pamela L Bradley; Shih-Fu Chang; Norbert Perrimon; Stephen T C Wong
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2008-01

6.  THE ORIGIN OF FIVE MUTATIONS IN EYE COLOR IN DROSOPHILA AND THEIR MODES OF INHERITANCE.

Authors:  T H Morgan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1911-04-07       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Automated recognition of patterns characteristic of subcellular structures in fluorescence microscopy images.

Authors:  M V Boland; M K Markey; R F Murphy
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1998-11-01

8.  The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  S Brenner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila.

Authors:  C Nüsslein-Volhard; E Wieschaus
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1980-10-30       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes.

Authors:  Anne E Carpenter; Thouis R Jones; Michael R Lamprecht; Colin Clarke; In Han Kang; Ola Friman; David A Guertin; Joo Han Chang; Robert A Lindquist; Jason Moffat; Polina Golland; David M Sabatini
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  166 in total

1.  Microfluidics-integrated time-lapse imaging for analysis of cellular dynamics.

Authors:  Dirk R Albrecht; Gregory H Underhill; Joshua Resnikoff; Avital Mendelson; Sangeeta N Bhatia; Jagesh V Shah
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  Automated discovery and quantification of image-based complex phenotypes: a twin study of drusen phenotypes in age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Gwenole Quellec; Stephen R Russell; Johanna M Seddon; Robyn Reynolds; Todd Scheetz; Vinit B Mahajan; Edwin M Stone; Michael D Abràmoff
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Unsupervised modeling of cell morphology dynamics for time-lapse microscopy.

Authors:  Qing Zhong; Alberto Giovanni Busetto; Juan P Fededa; Joachim M Buhmann; Daniel W Gerlich
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-05-27       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 4.  Automated quantitative live cell fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  Michael Fero; Kit Pogliano
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 10.005

5.  Workflow and metrics for image quality control in large-scale high-content screens.

Authors:  Mark-Anthony Bray; Adam N Fraser; Thomas P Hasaka; Anne E Carpenter
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2011-09-28

Review 6.  RNAi screening: new approaches, understandings, and organisms.

Authors:  Stephanie E Mohr; Norbert Perrimon
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 9.957

7.  EXTRACTING BIOMEDICALLY IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM LARGE, AUTOMATED IMAGING EXPERIMENTS.

Authors:  Anne E Carpenter
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2011

8.  Nonviral Reprogramming of Human Wharton's Jelly Cells Reveals Differences Between ATOH1 Homologues.

Authors:  Adam J Mellott; Keerthana Devarajan; Heather E Shinogle; David S Moore; Zsolt Talata; Jennifer S Laurence; M Laird Forrest; Sumihare Noji; Eiji Tanaka; Hinrich Staecker; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.845

9.  Comparison of methods for image-based profiling of cellular morphological responses to small-molecule treatment.

Authors:  Vebjorn Ljosa; Peter D Caie; Rob Ter Horst; Katherine L Sokolnicki; Emma L Jenkins; Sandeep Daya; Mark E Roberts; Thouis R Jones; Shantanu Singh; Auguste Genovesio; Paul A Clemons; Neil O Carragher; Anne E Carpenter
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2013-09-17

10.  A Multivariate Computational Method to Analyze High-Content RNAi Screening Data.

Authors:  Jonathan Rameseder; Konstantin Krismer; Yogesh Dayma; Tobias Ehrenberger; Mun Kyung Hwang; Edoardo M Airoldi; Scott R Floyd; Michael B Yaffe
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2015-04-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.