Literature DB >> 19186130

Blind test of physics-based prediction of protein structures.

M Scott Shell1, S Banu Ozkan, Vincent Voelz, Guohong Albert Wu, Ken A Dill.   

Abstract

We report here a multiprotein blind test of a computer method to predict native protein structures based solely on an all-atom physics-based force field. We use the AMBER 96 potential function with an implicit (GB/SA) model of solvation, combined with replica-exchange molecular-dynamics simulations. Coarse conformational sampling is performed using the zipping and assembly method (ZAM), an approach that is designed to mimic the putative physical routes of protein folding. ZAM was applied to the folding of six proteins, from 76 to 112 monomers in length, in CASP7, a community-wide blind test of protein structure prediction. Because these predictions have about the same level of accuracy as typical bioinformatics methods, and do not utilize information from databases of known native structures, this work opens up the possibility of predicting the structures of membrane proteins, synthetic peptides, or other foldable polymers, for which there is little prior knowledge of native structures. This approach may also be useful for predicting physical protein folding routes, non-native conformations, and other physical properties from amino acid sequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19186130      PMCID: PMC2716649          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2008.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  28 in total

1.  A method for optimizing potential-energy functions by a hierarchical design of the potential-energy landscape: application to the UNRES force field.

Authors:  Adam Liwo; Piotr Arłukowicz; Cezary Czaplewski; Stanislaw Ołdziej; Jaroslaw Pillardy; Harold A Scheraga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Protein structure prediction and structural genomics.

Authors:  D Baker; A Sali
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Evolution and physics in comparative protein structure modeling.

Authors:  András Fiser; Michael Feig; Charles L Brooks; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 22.384

4.  Folding rates and low-entropy-loss routes of two-state proteins.

Authors:  Thomas R Weikl; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-06-06       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Ab initio folding simulation of the Trp-cage mini-protein approaches NMR resolution.

Authors:  Shibasish Chowdhury; Mathew C Lee; Guoming Xiong; Yong Duan
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-03-28       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Understanding folding and design: replica-exchange simulations of "Trp-cage" miniproteins.

Authors:  Jed W Pitera; William Swope
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  All-atom structure prediction and folding simulations of a stable protein.

Authors:  Carlos Simmerling; Bentley Strockbine; Adrian E Roitberg
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2002-09-25       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  A brighter future for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  P Koehl; M Levitt
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1999-02

9.  Can a continuum solvent model reproduce the free energy landscape of a beta -hairpin folding in water?

Authors:  Ruhong Zhou; Bruce J Berne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Folding kinetics of two-state proteins: effect of circularization, permutation, and crosslinks.

Authors:  Thomas R Weikl; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-09-26       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  18 in total

1.  An enumerative stepwise ansatz enables atomic-accuracy RNA loop modeling.

Authors:  Parin Sripakdeevong; Wipapat Kladwang; Rhiju Das
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Smoothing protein energy landscapes by integrating folding models with structure prediction.

Authors:  Ari Pritchard-Bell; M Scott Shell
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Charge effects on the fibril-forming peptide KTVIIE: a two-dimensional replica exchange simulation study.

Authors:  Joohyun Jeon; M Scott Shell
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Tackling force-field bias in protein folding simulations: folding of Villin HP35 and Pin WW domains in explicit water.

Authors:  Jeetain Mittal; Robert B Best
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Union of geometric constraint-based simulations with molecular dynamics for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Tyler J Glembo; S Banu Ozkan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Computing protein stabilities from their chain lengths.

Authors:  Kingshuk Ghosh; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Constraining local structure can speed up folding by promoting structural polarization of the folding pathway.

Authors:  Patrick M Buck; Christopher Bystroff
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 8.  The loop hypothesis: contribution of early formed specific non-local interactions to the determination of protein folding pathways.

Authors:  Tomer Orevi; Gil Rahamim; Gershon Hazan; Dan Amir; Elisha Haas
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2013-04-12

9.  Partial unfolding and refolding for structure refinement: A unified approach of geometric simulations and molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Avishek Kumar; Paul Campitelli; M F Thorpe; S Banu Ozkan
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-11-17

10.  Protein folding requires crowd control in a simulated cell.

Authors:  Benjamin R Jefferys; Lawrence A Kelley; Michael J E Sternberg
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.