OBJECTIVE: It has been reported recently that correlation between brain tissue oxygen (PbtO2) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) may serve as an indicator of cerebral autoregulation after subarachnoid hemorrhage. We aimed to compare similar indices describing interaction between changes in intracranial pressure (ICP), arterial blood pressure (ABP), and brain tissue oxygen to verify their clinical utility in patients after traumatic brain injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of multimodal monitoring of 32 patients suffering from head injury, admitted in the Neurosciences Critical Care Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK. Initial 24 h intervals of continuous ABP, ICP, and PbtO2 recordings were analyzed. Index of tissue oxygen reactivity ORx was evaluated as the correlation coefficient between PbtO2 and CPP over a period of 60 min and compared to the index of pressure reactivity PRx. "Optimal CPP" and a hypothetical "optimal PbtO2" were defined as the ranges of CPP and PbtO2 at which PRx or ORx were indicating best cerebrovascular milieu. RESULTS: PRx and ORx mean values did not show any correlation with each other (R = 0.012; P = 0.95) between patients. There was also no correlation between ORx and PbtO2 (R = 0.098; P = 0.61) and between PRx and PbtO2 (R = 0.019; P = 0.923). No clear and consistent value of "optimal CPP" minimizing ORx or of hypothetical "optimal PbtO2" were found analyzing PbtO2 or ORx trend over the 24 h of monitoring. However, in most of patients 'optimal CPP' has been found for PRx index. The same has been confirmed when the data from whole monitoring period were analyzed. There was no correlation between values of 'optimal CPP' assessed using ORx and 'optimal CPP' assessed with PRx. CONCLUSION: The relationships between PbtO2, ORx, and CPP in head injury appear less useful than reported before for patients after subarachnoid hemorrhage.
OBJECTIVE: It has been reported recently that correlation between brain tissue oxygen (PbtO2) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) may serve as an indicator of cerebral autoregulation after subarachnoid hemorrhage. We aimed to compare similar indices describing interaction between changes in intracranial pressure (ICP), arterial blood pressure (ABP), and brain tissue oxygen to verify their clinical utility in patients after traumatic brain injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of multimodal monitoring of 32 patients suffering from head injury, admitted in the Neurosciences Critical Care Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK. Initial 24 h intervals of continuous ABP, ICP, and PbtO2 recordings were analyzed. Index of tissue oxygen reactivity ORx was evaluated as the correlation coefficient between PbtO2 and CPP over a period of 60 min and compared to the index of pressure reactivity PRx. "Optimal CPP" and a hypothetical "optimal PbtO2" were defined as the ranges of CPP and PbtO2 at which PRx or ORx were indicating best cerebrovascular milieu. RESULTS:PRx and ORx mean values did not show any correlation with each other (R = 0.012; P = 0.95) between patients. There was also no correlation between ORx and PbtO2 (R = 0.098; P = 0.61) and between PRx and PbtO2 (R = 0.019; P = 0.923). No clear and consistent value of "optimal CPP" minimizing ORx or of hypothetical "optimal PbtO2" were found analyzing PbtO2 or ORx trend over the 24 h of monitoring. However, in most of patients 'optimal CPP' has been found for PRx index. The same has been confirmed when the data from whole monitoring period were analyzed. There was no correlation between values of 'optimal CPP' assessed using ORx and 'optimal CPP' assessed with PRx. CONCLUSION: The relationships between PbtO2, ORx, and CPP in head injury appear less useful than reported before for patients after subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Authors: J Claude Hemphill; Wade S Smith; D Christian Sonne; Diane Morabito; Geoffrey T Manley Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Luzius A Steiner; Marek Czosnyka; Stefan K Piechnik; Piotr Smielewski; Doris Chatfield; David K Menon; John D Pickard Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Ryan Tackla; Jason M Hinzman; Brandon Foreman; Mark Magner; Norberto Andaluz; Jed A Hartings Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Gerd Grözinger; Martin Schenk; Matthias H Morgalla; Christian Thiel; Karolin Thiel; Martin U Schuhmann Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Martin Barth; Johannes Woitzik; Christel Weiss; Elke Muench; Michael Diepers; Peter Schmiedek; Hidetoshi Kasuya; Peter Vajkoczy Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: R Morgan Stuart; Michael Schmidt; Pedro Kurtz; Allen Waziri; Raimund Helbok; Stephan A Mayer; Kiwon Lee; Neeraj Badjatia; Lawrence J Hirsch; E Sander Connolly; Jan Claassen Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 3.210