Literature DB >> 19184077

Influence of head positioning on the forces occurring during microlaryngoscopy.

Gerhard Friedrich1, Markus Gugatschka.   

Abstract

Considerable forces are exerted on oropharyngeal tissues during microlaryngoscopic procedures. Although it is generally accepted that positioning of the patient's head influences the quantity of these forces and the easiness of the exposure of the anterior glottis, there is a lack of systematic studies on this topic. The aim of our study was to measure the forces occurring during microlaryngoscopy in different positions. This should result in a recommendation for a "low-pressure" position which minimises the risk of postoperative complications due to tissue trauma. Thirty consecutive patients planned for microlaryngoscopy underwent study procedures. During general anaesthesia, measurements were taken using a tension spring balance in neutral position, during extension of the cervical spine, as well as under moderate and maximum flexion. Elevation of the patient's head thus flexing the cervical spine reduced the occurring forces significantly. Maximum elevation allowed a full exposure of the anterior commissure in all cases, whereas exposure of the anterior commissure was not possible even with maximum external counterpressure in almost 40% of cases with maximum extended cervical spine. The largest differences were observed between extension, neutral and flexion position, whereas the differences between moderate and maximum flexion were not significant. Elevation of the patient's head with consecutive flexion of the cervical spine allows for better exposure in microlaryngoscopy and reduces significantly the pressure exerted on the oropharyngeal tissues thus minimising the risk of tissue injury. A slight modification of standard instruments can be necessary when using this "low-pressure" position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19184077     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-009-0913-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  11 in total

Review 1.  Analysis of the forces and position required for direct laryngoscopic exposure of the anterior vocal folds.

Authors:  I I Hochman; S M Zeitels; J T Heaton
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Complications of suspension laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Jens Peter Klussmann; Robert Knoedgen; Claus Wittekindt; Michael Damm; Hans Edmund Eckel
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.547

3.  Analysis of forces applied during microlaryngoscopy: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Markus Gugatschka; Claus Gerstenberger; Gerhard Friedrich
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  [The incidence of microlaryngoscopy associated complications].

Authors:  A Müller; L Verges; P Schleier; M Wohlfarth; R Gottschall
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Oropharyngeal complications of suspension laryngoscopy: a prospective study.

Authors:  Clark A Rosen; Pedro A Andrade Filho; Lucia Scheffel; Robert Buckmire
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Complications of direct laryngoscopy.

Authors:  D A Drezner
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  Vocal fold exposure in phonosurgery.

Authors:  C W Vaughan
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  "External counterpressure" and "internal distention" for optimal laryngoscopic exposure of the anterior glottal commissure.

Authors:  S M Zeitels; C W Vaughan
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 1.547

9.  [Hypoglossal nerve paralysis after intubation and direct laryngoscopy].

Authors:  M A Condado; D Morais; J Santos; J Alonso-Vielba; V Miyar
Journal:  Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec

10.  Admission planning and complications of direct laryngoscopy.

Authors:  R A Hendrix; A Ferouz; C K Bacon
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.497

View more
  4 in total

1.  Analysis of pressure applied during microlaryngoscopy.

Authors:  Rui Fang; Hao Chen; Jingwu Sun
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Curved rigid laryngoscope: missing link between direct suspension laryngoscopy and indirect techniques?

Authors:  Gerhard Friedrich; Karl Kiesler; Markus Gugatschka
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  [First clinical experience with a moderately bent laryngoscope for endolaryngeal surgery].

Authors:  M Gugatschka; K Kiesler; C Gerstenberger; G Friedrich
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Study of the head and neck position in microlaryngoscopy using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Busheng Tong; Rui Fang; Benjamin L Smith
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 2.503

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.