Literature DB >> 18246364

Analysis of forces applied during microlaryngoscopy: a descriptive study.

Markus Gugatschka1, Claus Gerstenberger, Gerhard Friedrich.   

Abstract

Microlaryngoscopic interventions are part of daily clinical routine in modern laryngology. In most cases, fulcrum-based laryngoscopy is performed, where endolaryngeal structures are exposed by laryngoscopes of different sizes and kinds. Aim of our study was to describe forces appearing during microlaryngoscopy (MLX) as well as parameters influencing easiness of exposure and given gender differences. Starting from May 2006, 100 consecutive patients scheduled for microlaryngoscopy underwent study procedures. While performing microlaryngoscopy under general anaesthesia by using a device after Kleinsasser, force measurements were obtained with a tension spring balance attached to the laryngoscope holder (F (chest)). By using the law of the lever and given distances, we calculated dimensions of occurring forces on upper teeth (F (teeth)) and base of the tongue (F (tongue)). Mean force (F (chest)) obtained by measurement with the spring balance in our study cohort was 4.4 kg (43.2 N). Whereas the force exerted on the teeth/toothless upper jaw is 4.4-fold F (chest), the force exerted on base of the tongue (F (tongue)) is the sum of both forces (F (teeth) + F (chest)). Thus, the mean force exerted on teeth is 19.4 kg ( approximately 190 N), force exerted on base of the tongue is 23.8 kg (233.5 N). Status of teeth was described as an independent variable and correlated with both easiness of exposure of the operational field, as well with occurring forces. We could not identify gender differences of either kind. Jet anaesthesia did not influence pressure loads or easiness of exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18246364     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-008-0586-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  6 in total

Review 1.  Analysis of the forces and position required for direct laryngoscopic exposure of the anterior vocal folds.

Authors:  I I Hochman; S M Zeitels; J T Heaton
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Complications of suspension laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Jens Peter Klussmann; Robert Knoedgen; Claus Wittekindt; Michael Damm; Hans Edmund Eckel
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.547

3.  Suspension laryngoscopy revisited.

Authors:  Steven M Zeitels; James A Burns; Seth H Dailey
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.547

4.  Oropharyngeal complications of suspension laryngoscopy: a prospective study.

Authors:  Clark A Rosen; Pedro A Andrade Filho; Lucia Scheffel; Robert Buckmire
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Vocal fold exposure in phonosurgery.

Authors:  C W Vaughan
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  "External counterpressure" and "internal distention" for optimal laryngoscopic exposure of the anterior glottal commissure.

Authors:  S M Zeitels; C W Vaughan
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 1.547

  6 in total
  6 in total

1.  Analysis of pressure applied during microlaryngoscopy.

Authors:  Rui Fang; Hao Chen; Jingwu Sun
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Curved rigid laryngoscope: missing link between direct suspension laryngoscopy and indirect techniques?

Authors:  Gerhard Friedrich; Karl Kiesler; Markus Gugatschka
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  [First clinical experience with a moderately bent laryngoscope for endolaryngeal surgery].

Authors:  M Gugatschka; K Kiesler; C Gerstenberger; G Friedrich
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Management of Difficult Laryngeal Exposure During Suspension Microlaryngoscopy.

Authors:  Anagha Atul Joshi; Madhu Sudhan Velecharla; Tejal Sunil Patel; Kshitij Dhaval Shah; Renuka Anil Bradoo
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-08-23

5.  Study of the head and neck position in microlaryngoscopy using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Busheng Tong; Rui Fang; Benjamin L Smith
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Influence of head positioning on the forces occurring during microlaryngoscopy.

Authors:  Gerhard Friedrich; Markus Gugatschka
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 2.503

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.