Literature DB >> 19182018

Advantages of optical compared with electromagnetic tracking.

Neil D Glossop1.   

Abstract

Tracking systems are critical to all types of computer-assisted image-guided intervention. Many technologies exist; however, only optical and electromagnetic systems are widely used commercially. In orthopaedic applications, optical systems dominate because of the large working volume and accuracy, but these systems suffer from deficiencies due to line of sight. Electromagnetic trackers can be made much smaller but are less accurate and are affected by metal, although current-generation systems are less affected by metal artifacts than were the earlier ones, which were more widely reported in the literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19182018     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  9 in total

1.  Multimedia article. Navigated renal access using electromagnetic tracking: an initial experience.

Authors:  Johannes Huber; Ingmar Wegner; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Peter Hallscheidt; Boris Hadaschik; Sascha Pahernik; Markus Hohenfellner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  AngleNav: MEMS Tracker to Facilitate CT-Guided Puncture.

Authors:  Rui Li; Sheng Xu; William F Pritchard; John W Karanian; Venkatesh P Krishnasamy; Bradford J Wood; Zion Tsz Ho Tse
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Navigation system for minimally invasive esophagectomy: experimental study in a porcine model.

Authors:  Felix Nickel; Hannes G Kenngott; Jochen Neuhaus; Christof M Sommer; Tobias Gehrig; Armin Kolb; Matthias Gondan; Boris A Radeleff; Anja Schaible; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Carsten N Gutt; Beat-Peter Müller-Stich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Model-based correction of tissue compression for tracked ultrasound in soft tissue image-guided surgery.

Authors:  Thomas S Pheiffer; Reid C Thompson; Daniel C Rucker; Amber L Simpson; Michael I Miga
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Realization of a biomechanical model-assisted image guidance system for breast cancer surgery using supine MRI.

Authors:  Rebekah H Conley; Ingrid M Meszoely; Jared A Weis; Thomas S Pheiffer; Lori R Arlinghaus; Thomas E Yankeelov; Michael I Miga
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Target registration errors in navigation-assisted mandibular surgery according to the tracking methods and the type of markers: experiments using human dry mandibular bone.

Authors:  Hee-Guen Kang; Sang-Hoon Kang; Hang-Keun Kim; Young-Don Son
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 1.852

7.  Comparison of acquisition and iterative reconstruction parameters in abdominal computed tomography-guided procedures: a phantom study.

Authors:  Julien Frandon; Philippe Akessoul; Aymeric Hamard; Edinaud Bezandry; Romaric Loffroy; Takieddine Addala; Martin M Bertrand; Jean-Paul Beregi; Joël Greffier
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-01

8.  Compensating for Soft-Tissue Artifact Using the Orientation of Distal Limb Segments During Electromagnetic Motion Capture of the Upper Limb.

Authors:  Zachary Bons; Taylor Dickinson; Ryan Clark; Kari Beardsley; Steven K Charles
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 1.899

9.  Computer assisted electromagnetic navigation improves accuracy in computed tomography guided interventions: A prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Pierre Durand; Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry; Anne-Sophie Silvent; Julien Frandon; Emilie Chipon; Maud Médici; Ivan Bricault
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.