Literature DB >> 19181254

Impact of different CT slice thickness on clinical target volume for 3D conformal radiation therapy.

Ramachandran Prabhakar1, Tharmar Ganesh, Goura K Rath, Pramod K Julka, Pappiah S Sridhar, Rakesh C Joshi, Sanjay Thulkar.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to present the variation of clinical target volume (CTV) with different computed tomography (CT) slice thicknesses and the impact of CT slice thickness on 3-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy treatment planning. Fifty patients with brain tumors were selected and CT scans with 2.5-, 5-, and 10-mm slice thicknesses were performed with non-ionic contrast enhancement. The patients were selected with tumor volume ranging from 2.54 cc to 222 cc. Three-dimensional treatment planning was performed for all three CT datasets. The target coverage and the isocenter shift between the treatment plans for different slice thickness were correlated with the tumor volume. An important observation from our study revealed that for volume <25 cc, most of the cases were underdosed by 18% with 5-mm slice thickness and 27% with 10-mm slickness. For volume >25 cc, the target underdosage was less than 6.7% for 5-mm slice thickness and 8% for 10-mm slice thickness. For 3D conformal radiotherapy treatment planning (3DCRT), a CT slice thickness of 2.5 mm is optimum for tumor volume <25 cc, and 5 mm is optimum for tumor volume >25 cc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19181254     DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2007.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Dosim        ISSN: 1873-4022            Impact factor:   1.482


  11 in total

1.  Development, implementation and evaluation of a dedicated metal artefact reduction method for interventional flat-detector CT.

Authors:  D Prell; W A Kalender; Y Kyriakou
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  The effect of slice thickness on target and organs at risk volumes, dosimetric coverage and radiobiological impact in IMRT planning.

Authors:  S P Srivastava; C-W Cheng; I J Das
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  What is the best way to evaluate clinical target volume for radiotherapy of brain tumors?

Authors:  Alba Fiorentino; Piernicola Pedicini; Rocchina Caivano; Vincenzo Fusco
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2013-11

4.  Postmastectomy radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer patients: Comparison of advanced techniques.

Authors:  Yibo Xie; Daniel Bourgeois; Beibei Guo; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 1.482

5.  The impact of computed tomography slice thickness on the assessment of stereotactic, 3D conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy of brain tumors.

Authors:  R Caivano; A Fiorentino; P Pedicini; G Califano; V Fusco
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  The effect of longitudinal CT resolution and pixel size (FOV) on target delineation and treatment planning in stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Maria R Bellon; M Salim Siddiqui; Samuel Ryu; Indrin J Chetty
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2014

7.  Influence of image slice thickness on rectal dose-response relationships following radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  C Olsson; M Thor; M Liu; V Moissenko; S E Petersen; M Høyer; A Apte; J O Deasy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 8.  Radiotherapy: Basic Concepts and Recent Advances.

Authors:  S R Mehta; V Suhag; M Semwal; N Sharma
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

9.  Is it possible to estimate volume of bone defects formed on dry sheep mandibles more practically by secondarily reconstructing section thickness of cone beam computed tomography images?

Authors:  Alaettin Koç; Sema Kaya
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 10.  Treatment techniques to reduce cardiac irradiation for breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy: a review.

Authors:  Robert E Beck; Leonard Kim; Ning J Yue; Bruce G Haffty; Atif J Khan; Sharad Goyal
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.