Literature DB >> 19176732

Opportunities and challenges in conducting systematic reviews to support the development of nutrient reference values: vitamin A as an example.

Robert Russell1, Mei Chung, Ethan M Balk, Stephanie Atkinson, Edward L Giovannucci, Stanley Ip, Alice H Lichtenstein, Susan Taylor Mayne, Gowri Raman, A Catharine Ross, Thomas A Trikalinos, Keith P West, Joseph Lau.   

Abstract

Nutrient reference values have significant public health and policy implications. Given the importance of defining reliable nutrient reference values, there is a need for an explicit, objective, and transparent process to set these values. The Tufts Medical Center Evidence-based Practice Center assembled a group of nutrition experts from academic institutions and federal government agencies, led participants in discussions, conducted exercises in formulating questions and evidence review criteria that would be amenable to systematic reviews of the scientific literature, performed a literature search on the questions to identify potentially relevant publications, and identified challenges and limitations of applying this method to support the development of nutrient reference values using vitamin A as an example. The workgroup concluded that the systematic review approach could be productively used to inform the development of reference values. Challenges identified in this exercise include prioritizing and defining research questions when the volume of literature is large, relying on intermediate (surrogate) outcomes when few or no studies directly linking nutrient intake with clinical outcomes are available, and determining reliable nutrient biomarkers. Ultimately, an objective, unbiased systematic review of a defined question could be useful, not only in helping to set nutrient reference values, but also for increasing the transparency of the decision making process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19176732      PMCID: PMC2667653          DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.27154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  13 in total

1.  Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process.

Authors:  R P Harris; M Helfand; S H Woolf; K N Lohr; C D Mulrow; S M Teutsch; D Atkins
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Dietary reference intakes: vitamin A, vitamin K, arsenic, boron, chromium, copper, iodine, iron, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, silicon, vanadium, and zinc.

Authors:  P Trumbo; A A Yates; S Schlicker; M Poos
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2001-03

Review 3.  Laboratory issues: use of nutritional biomarkers.

Authors:  Heidi Michels Blanck; Barbara A Bowman; Gerald R Cooper; Gary L Myers; Dayton T Miller
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 4.  Formulating questions and locating primary studies for inclusion in systematic reviews.

Authors:  C Counsell
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein and amino acids.

Authors:  Paula Trumbo; Sandra Schlicker; Allison A Yates; Mary Poos
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2002-11

Review 6.  Highlights of 'a model for establishing upper levels of intake for nutrients and related substances: report of a Joint FAO/WHO Technical Workshop on Nutrient Risk Assessment, May 2-6, 2005'.

Authors:  Christine Lewis Taylor
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.110

7.  The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.

Authors:  S H Downs; N Black
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Serum levels of vitamin A and carotenoids as reflectors of nutritional status.

Authors:  J A Olson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Recommended dietary intakes (RDI) of vitamin A in humans.

Authors:  J A Olson
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 10.  Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography.

Authors:  Simon Sanderson; Iain D Tatt; Julian P T Higgins
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  10 in total

1.  Defining the process of Dietary Reference Intakes: framework for the United States and Canada.

Authors:  Stephanie A Atkinson
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 2.  History of Nutrition: The Long Road Leading to the Dietary Reference Intakes for the United States and Canada.

Authors:  Suzanne P Murphy; Allison A Yates; Stephanie A Atkinson; Susan I Barr; Johanna Dwyer
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 3.  Emerging Concepts in Nutrient Needs.

Authors:  Patrick J Stover; Cutberto Garza; Jane Durga; Martha S Field
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Empirical evaluation of meta-analytic approaches for nutrient and health outcome dose-response data.

Authors:  Winifred W Yu; Christopher H Schmid; Alice H Lichtenstein; Joseph Lau; Thomas A Trikalinos
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.273

5.  Using risk of bias domains to identify opportunities for improvement in food- and nutrition-related research: An evaluation of research type and design, year of publication, and source of funding.

Authors:  E F Myers; J S Parrott; P Splett; M Chung; D Handu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Vitamin K2 Needs an RDI Separate from Vitamin K1.

Authors:  Asim Cengiz Akbulut; Angelina Pavlic; Ploingarm Petsophonsakul; Maurice Halder; Katarzyna Maresz; Rafael Kramann; Leon Schurgers
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-06-21       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 7.  Evidence-based approaches for establishing the 2015 Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans.

Authors:  Sangah Shin; Subeen Kim; Hyojee Joung
Journal:  Nutr Res Pract       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 1.926

8.  The Validity of Children's Fruit and Vegetable Intake Using Plasma Vitamins A, C, and E: The SAYCARE Study.

Authors:  Tatiana Sadalla Collese; Augusto César Ferreira De Moraes; Tara Rendo-Urteaga; Liania Alves Luzia; Patrícia Helen de Carvalho Rondó; Dirce Maria Lobo Marchioni; Heráclito Barbosa Carvalho
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Vitamin D intakes and health outcomes in infants and preschool children: Summary of an evidence report.

Authors:  Andrew R Beauchesne; Kelly Copeland Cara; Danielle M Krobath; Laura Paige Penkert; Shruti P Shertukde; Danielle S Cahoon; Belen Prado; Ruogu Li; Qisi Yao; Jing Huang; Tee Reh; Mei Chung
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 5.348

10.  Fructose, high-fructose corn syrup, sucrose, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease or indexes of liver health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mei Chung; Jiantao Ma; Kamal Patel; Samantha Berger; Joseph Lau; Alice H Lichtenstein
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 7.045

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.