Literature DB >> 25214383

The effects of x-ray beam hardening on detective quantum efficiency and radiation dose.

Molly Donovan Wong1, Xizeng Wu2, Hong Liu1.   

Abstract

The goal of this preliminary study was to investigate the effects of x-ray beam hardening on the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) and the radiation dose of an inline x-ray imaging system. The ability to decrease the risk of harmful radiation to the patient without compromising the detection capability would more effectively balance the tradeoff between image quality and radiation dose, and therefore benefit the fields of diagnostic x-ray imaging, especially mammography. The DQE and the average glandular dose were both calculated under the same experimental conditions for a range of beam hardening levels, corresponding to no added beam hardening and two thicknesses each of Rhodium (Rh) and Molybdenum (Mo) filters. The dose calculation results demonstrate a reduction of 15% to 24% for the range of beam hardening levels. The comparison of all quantities comprising the DQE exhibit very close correlation between the results obtained without added beam hardening to the results corresponding to the range of beam hardening levels. For the specific experimental conditions utilized in this preliminary study, the results are an indication that the use of beam hardening holds the potential to reduce the radiation dose without decreasing the performance of the system. Future studies will seek to apply this method in a clinical environment and perform a comprehensive image quality evaluation, in an effort to further evaluate the potential of beam hardening to balance the tradeoff between dose and image quality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostic x-ray imaging; beam hardening; detective quantum efficiency (DQE); modulation transfer function (MTF); noise equivalent quanta (NEQ); noise power spectrum (NPS); radiation dose

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 25214383      PMCID: PMC4163960          DOI: 10.3233/XST-2011-0310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol        ISSN: 0895-3996            Impact factor:   1.535


  35 in total

1.  Phase contrast enhancement of x-ray mammography: a design study.

Authors:  C J Kotre; I P Birch
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment.

Authors:  J M Boone
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Measurement of the presampled two-dimensional modulation transfer function of digital imaging systems.

Authors:  Kenneth A Fetterly; Nicholas J Hangiandreou; Beth A Schueler; E Russell Ritenour
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Michael J Flynn
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Quantitative characterization of edge enhancement in phase contrast x-ray imaging.

Authors:  P Monnin; S Bulling; J Hoszowska; J F Valley; R Meuli; F R Verdun
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  The development of mammography.

Authors:  J Law
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography.

Authors:  H Fujita; D Y Tsai; T Itoh; K Doi; J Morishita; K Ueda; A Ohtsuka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 8.  Toward consensus on quantitative assessment of medical imaging systems.

Authors:  C E Metz; R F Wagner; K Doi; D G Brown; R M Nishikawa; K J Myers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Effects of undersampling on the proper interpretation of modulation transfer function, noise power spectra, and noise equivalent quanta of digital imaging systems.

Authors:  J T Dobbins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  The line spread function and modulation transfer function of a computed tomographic scanner.

Authors:  P F Judy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1976 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of mean glandular dose and modulation transfer function for different tube potentials and target-filter combinations in computed radiography mammography.

Authors:  Siti Aishah Abdul Aziz; Abdul Khaliq Mohd Saparudin; Ahmad Zaky Harun
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2013-05

2.  Low dose high energy x-ray in-line phase sensitive imaging prototype: Investigation of optimal geometric conditions and design parameters.

Authors:  Muhammad U Ghani; Aimin Yan; Molly D Wong; Yuhua Li; Liqiang Ren; Xizeng Wu; Hong Liu
Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.535

3.  Dose and detectability improvements with high energy phase sensitive x-ray imaging in comparison to low energy conventional imaging.

Authors:  Molly Donovan Wong; Aimin Yan; Muhammad Ghani; Yuhua Li; Laurie Fajardo; Xizeng Wu; Hong Liu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Image quality and dose efficiency of high energy phase sensitive x-ray imaging: phantom studies.

Authors:  Molly Donovan Wong; Xizeng Wu; Hong Liu
Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.535

5.  Using Microbubble as Contrast Agent for High-Energy X-Ray In-line Phase Contrast Imaging: Demonstration and Comparison Study.

Authors:  Di Wu; Molly Donovan Wong; Kai Yang; Aimin Yan; Yuhua Li; Laurie Fajardo; Bin Zheng; Xizeng Wu; Hong Liu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Investigation of spatial resolution characteristics of an in vivo micro computed tomography system.

Authors:  Muhammad U Ghani; Zhongxing Zhou; Liqiang Ren; Yuhua Li; Bin Zheng; Kai Yang; Hong Liu
Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 1.455

7.  The role of off-focus radiation in scatter correction for dedicated cone beam breast CT.

Authors:  Linxi Shi; Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Lei Zhu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 4.071

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.