Literature DB >> 19174710

Partial ossicular reconstruction: comparison of three different prostheses in clinical and experimental studies.

Marcus Neudert1, Thomas Zahnert, Nikoloz Lasurashvili, Matthias Bornitz, Zlatina Lavcheva, Christian Offergeld.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the reconstruction results of a long incus process defect using 3 different partial ossicular replacement prostheses (PORP). STUDY
DESIGN: Temporal bone experiments and retrospective case review.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. EXPERIMENTAL MATERIAL AND PATIENTS: The experimental study was performed on 18 temporal bones; 66 patients with retraction pockets, chronic otitis media with or without cholesteatoma.
INTERVENTIONS: Ossiculoplasty using 3 different PORP: titanium angle prosthesis, autologous incus interposition, and titanium clip prosthesis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Laser Doppler vibrometry in temporal bones measured transmission properties of the PORP. Patients were retrospectively assessed up to 5 years after surgery. Audiologic data were analyzed for preoperative and postoperative air conduction and air-bone gap at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 kHz. Statistical analyses compared the outcome in the experimental and clinical setting.
RESULTS: Experimentally, the titanium PORP showed similar transmission properties because the overall difference to the intact specimen was -4.14 +/- 0.59 dB for the titanium angle prosthesis and -4.61 +/- 0.57 dB for the titanium clip prosthesis. The transmission after an autologous incus interposition was significantly worse (-9.32 +/- 0.39 dB, p < or = 0.001) compared with the other prostheses. Patients' mean postoperative air-bone gap was 25.5 +/- 1.2 dB and less than 20 dB in at least 66% of cases without any significant differences between the groups.
CONCLUSION: In the clinical setting, the confounding factors that influence the acoustic outcome after partial ossiculoplasty obscure the prosthesis-related transmission factors that can otherwise be derived in the experimental setting. The results do not generally favor the use of 1 specific prosthesis, rather they suggest that the correct choice of a prosthesis be based on the anatomic and pathophysiologic conditions found in the individual patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19174710     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31819679dd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  15 in total

1.  Hearing outcome after sequential cholesteatoma surgery.

Authors:  Susen Lailach; Thomas Zahnert; Nikoloz Lasurashvili; Max Kemper; Thomas Beleites; Marcus Neudert
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Long term results of the titanium clip prosthesis.

Authors:  Antoniu-Oreste Gostian; Jean-Marc Kouame; Martin Bremke; Magdalene Ortmann; Karl Bernd Hüttenbrink; Dirk Beutner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Comparison of glass ionomer cement and incus interposition in reconstruction of incus long process defects.

Authors:  Huseyin Dere; Fatih Ozdogan; K Murat Ozcan; Adin Selcuk; Ibrahim Ozcan; Gokhan Gokturk
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  [Reconstruction of the middle ear with passive implants].

Authors:  T Zahnert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  The effects of surgery type and different ossiculoplasty materials on the hearing results in cholesteatoma surgery.

Authors:  Sultan Şevik Eliçora; Duygu Erdem; Aykut Erdem Dinç; Murat Damar; Sultan Bişkin
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Cartilage island on stapes: autologous PORP in the hypoventilated middle ear.

Authors:  Jeanette Hess-Erga; Bart Lambertus Henricus Jozef Engelen; Flemming Slinning Vassbotn
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Exclusive Two Handed Endoscopic Cartilage Type 3 Tympanoplasty with Endoscope Holders.

Authors:  Mubarak Muhamed Khan; Sapna Ramkrishna Parab
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-03-09

8.  Functional results after cholesteatoma surgery in an adult population using the retrograde mastoidectomy technique.

Authors:  Amir Minovi; Johanna Venjacob; Stefan Volkenstein; John Dornhoffer; Stefan Dazert
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  First results of a novel adjustable-length ossicular reconstruction prosthesis in temporal bones.

Authors:  Peter K Gottlieb; Xiping Li; Ashkan Monfared; Nikolas Blevins; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Comparison of Ossiculoplasty Using Autograft Ossicle Versus Allograft (Teflon).

Authors:  Anupriya Hajela; Sunil Kumar; H P Singh; Veerendra Verma
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-04-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.