Literature DB >> 21909771

[Reconstruction of the middle ear with passive implants].

T Zahnert1.   

Abstract

Today the middle ear can be reconstructed in various ways: without any ossicular chain reconstruction, with reconstruction using autologous ossicles, with reconstruction using passive alloplastic implants or by using active implants. In recent decades, reconstruction with passive middle ear implants has increased for several reasons. It has been demonstrated that in the case of inflamed mucosa the resorption rate of autologous ossicles is around 15%. Modern alloplastic implants can be considered more resistant to inflammatory processes with high biocompatibility. Furthermore, modern alloplastic implants are low-weight with high rigidity. The greatest advantage lies in better coupling possibilities to the residual ossicular chain because of the introduction of coupling elements and also functional elements which are integrated into the prostheses. Due to the wide variety of passive implants this paper is intended to provide an overview of the best reconstruction solutions for the most typical ossicular chain defects using passive middle ear implants. Particular attention is paid to the use of alloplastic prosthesis compared to the use of autologous ossicles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21909771     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-011-2366-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  29 in total

1.  Optimum tension for partial ossicular replacement prosthesis reconstruction in the human middle ear.

Authors:  David P Morris; Manohar Bance; Rene G van Wijhe; Michael Kiefte; Rachael Smith
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  [Ear ossicle transplants for reconstruction of sound transmission in the middle ear. A histologic long-term study].

Authors:  H Hildmann; B Karger; E Steinbach
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.057

3.  Malleus-to-footplate ossicular reconstruction prosthesis positioning: cochleovestibular pressure optimization.

Authors:  Sunil Puria; Larisa D Kunda; Joseph B Roberson; Rodney C Perkins
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Titanium prosthesis with malleus notch: a study of its 'user-friendliness'.

Authors:  M Yung
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2007-02-26       Impact factor: 1.469

5.  Experimental investigations of the use of cartilage in tympanic membrane reconstruction.

Authors:  T Zahnert; K B Hüttenbrink; D Mürbe; M Bornitz
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  2000-05

6.  A modified prosthesis head for middle ear titanium implants--experimental and first clinical results.

Authors:  Jan Christoffer Luers; Karl-Bernd Huttenbrink; Axel Mickenhagen; Dirk Beutner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  [The cartilage guide: a solution for anchoring a columella-prosthesis on footplate].

Authors:  K-B Hüttenbrink; T Zahnert; D Beutner; G Hofmann
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.057

8.  Pathology of the ossicular chain in various chronic middle ear diseases.

Authors:  M Tos
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 1.469

9.  A new double-cartilage block ossiculoplasty: long-term results.

Authors:  Giuseppe Malafronte; Barbara Filosa; Frieda Mercone
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Incudostapedial rebridging ossiculoplasty with bone cement.

Authors:  Enver Ozer; Yildirim A Bayazit; Muzaffer Kanlikama; Semih Mumbuc; Zeki Ozen
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  4 in total

1.  [Quality control following reconstructive middle ear surgery: from bench to bedside].

Authors:  C Offergeld
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Visualisation of passive middle ear implants by cone beam and multi-detector computed tomography: a comparative in vitro study.

Authors:  T D Nguyen; S Kösling; R Mlynski; S K Plontke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  [From reconstruction to function : Hands-on training in tympanoplasty using real-time feedback].

Authors:  T Beleites; T Zahnert; M-L Polk; A Kluge; M Neudert; M Kemper
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Identification of risk factors for residual cholesteatoma in children and adults: a retrospective study on 110 cases of revision surgery.

Authors:  Veronika Volgger; Göran Lindeskog; Eike Krause; Florian Schrötzlmair
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-12-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.