Literature DB >> 19169429

The Influence of Photon Attenuation on Tumor-to-Background and Signal-to-Noise Ratios for SPECT Imaging.

Edward J Soares1, Michael A King, Charles L Byrne, Howard C Gifford, Andre Lehovich.   

Abstract

Expanding on the work of Nuyts et. al [1], Bai et. al. [2], and Bai and Shao [3], who all studied the effects of attenuation and attenuation correction on tumor-to-background ratios and signal detection, we have derived a general expression for the tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) for SPECT attenuated data that have been reconstructed with a linear, non-iterative reconstruction operator O. A special case of this is when O represents discrete filtered back-projection (FBP). The TBR of the reconstructed, uncorrected attenuated data (TBR(no-AC)) can be written as a weighted sum of the TBR of the FBP-reconstructed unattenuated data (TBR(FBP)) and the TBR of the FBP-reconstructed "difference" projection data (TBR(diff)). We evaluated the expression for TBR(no-AC) for a variety of objects and attenuation conditions. The ideal observer signal-to-noise ratio (SNR(ideal)) was also computed in projection space, in order to obtain an upper bound on signal detectability for a signal-known-exactly/background-known-exactly (SKE/BKE) detection task. The results generally show that SNR(ideal) is lower for tumors located deeper within the attenuating medium and increases for tumors nearer the edge of the object. In addition, larger values for the uniform attenuation coefficient μ lead to lower values for SNR(ideal). The TBR for FBP-reconstructed, uncorrected attenuated data can both under- and over-estimate the true TBR, depending on several properties of the attenuating medium, including the shape of the attenuator, the uniformity of the attenuator, and the degree to which the data are attenuated.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 19169429      PMCID: PMC2630207          DOI: 10.1109/NSSMIC.2007.4436905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997)        ISSN: 1095-7863


  5 in total

1.  An analytic study of the effects of attenuation on tumor detection in whole-body PET oncology imaging.

Authors:  Chuanyong Bai; Paul E Kinahan; David Brasse; Claude Comtat; David W Townsend; Carolyn C Meltzer; Victor Villemagne; Martin Charron; Michel Defrise
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Reducing loss of image quality because of the attenuation artifact in uncorrected PET whole-body images.

Authors:  Johan Nuyts; Sigrid Stroobants; Patrick Dupont; Stefaan Vleugels; Patrick Flamen; Luc Mortelmans
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Noise properties of the EM algorithm: I. Theory.

Authors:  H H Barrett; D W Wilson; B M Tsui
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Comparing filtered backprojection and ordered-subsets expectation maximization for small-lesion detection and localization in 67Ga SPECT.

Authors:  R G Wells; M A King; P H Simkin; P F Judy; A B Brill; H C Gifford; R Licho; P H Pretorius; P B Schneider; D W Seldin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Human-observer receiver-operating-characteristic evaluation of attenuation, scatter, and resolution compensation strategies for (99m)Tc myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Manoj V Narayanan; Michael A King; P Hendrik Pretorius; Seth T Dahlberg; Frederick Spencer; Ellen Simon; Eric Ewald; Edward Healy; Kirk MacNaught; Jeffrey A Leppo
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 10.057

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.