INTRODUCTION: An important technological advance in genetic testing is the DNA microarray, which allows for the simultaneous testing of thousands of DNA sequences. The AmpliChip CYP450 Test employs this microarray technology for cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 and CYP2C19 genotyping. Isoenzymes encoded by these genes are responsible for the metabolism of many widely prescribed drugs. The objectives of this study were to identify CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 alleles and phenotypes in a psychiatric patient population in Kentucky, and to describe practical issues associated with DNA microarray technology. METHODS: A total of 4,532 psychiatric patients were recruited from three state hospitals in Kentucky. Whole blood, buccal swabs, or saliva samples were genotyped with the AmpliChip CYP450 Test to derive a predicted phenotype. RESULTS: In this cohort, the overall prevalence of CYP2D6 poor metabolizers was 7.6% (95% CI 7%, 8.3%), 8.2% in the Caucasians (95% CI 7.4%, 9.%) and 1.8% in the African Americans (95% CI 0.9%, 3.5%). The overall prevalence of CYP2D6 ultrarapid metabolizers was 1.5% (95% CI 1.2%, 1.9%), 1.5% in the Caucasians (95% CI 1.1%, 1.9%) and 2.0% in the African Americans (95% CI 1.1%, 3.7%). The overall prevalence of CYP2C19 poor metabolizers was 2.0% (95% CI 1.8%, 2.7%), 2.2% in Caucasians (95% CI 1.6%, 2.5%) and 4.0% in African Americans (95% CI 2.6%, 6.1%). CONCLUSION: We also propose a numeric system for expression of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 enzyme activity to aid clinicians in determining treatment strategy for patients receiving therapeutics that are metabolized by the CYP2D6 or CYP2C19 gene products.
INTRODUCTION: An important technological advance in genetic testing is the DNA microarray, which allows for the simultaneous testing of thousands of DNA sequences. The AmpliChip CYP450 Test employs this microarray technology for cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 and CYP2C19 genotyping. Isoenzymes encoded by these genes are responsible for the metabolism of many widely prescribed drugs. The objectives of this study were to identify CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 alleles and phenotypes in a psychiatricpatient population in Kentucky, and to describe practical issues associated with DNA microarray technology. METHODS: A total of 4,532 psychiatricpatients were recruited from three state hospitals in Kentucky. Whole blood, buccal swabs, or saliva samples were genotyped with the AmpliChip CYP450 Test to derive a predicted phenotype. RESULTS: In this cohort, the overall prevalence of CYP2D6 poor metabolizers was 7.6% (95% CI 7%, 8.3%), 8.2% in the Caucasians (95% CI 7.4%, 9.%) and 1.8% in the African Americans (95% CI 0.9%, 3.5%). The overall prevalence of CYP2D6 ultrarapid metabolizers was 1.5% (95% CI 1.2%, 1.9%), 1.5% in the Caucasians (95% CI 1.1%, 1.9%) and 2.0% in the African Americans (95% CI 1.1%, 3.7%). The overall prevalence of CYP2C19 poor metabolizers was 2.0% (95% CI 1.8%, 2.7%), 2.2% in Caucasians (95% CI 1.6%, 2.5%) and 4.0% in African Americans (95% CI 2.6%, 6.1%). CONCLUSION: We also propose a numeric system for expression of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 enzyme activity to aid clinicians in determining treatment strategy for patients receiving therapeutics that are metabolized by the CYP2D6 or CYP2C19 gene products.
Authors: Andrea Gaedigk; Maria Isidoro-García; Robin E Pearce; Santiago Sánchez; Virginia García-Solaesa; Carolina Lorenzo-Romo; Gloria Gonzalez-Tejera; Susan Corey Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2010-05-16 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Victoria M Pratt; Barbara Zehnbauer; Jean Amos Wilson; Ruth Baak; Nikolina Babic; Maria Bettinotti; Arlene Buller; Ken Butz; Matthew Campbell; Chris Civalier; Abdalla El-Badry; Daniel H Farkas; Elaine Lyon; Saptarshi Mandal; Jason McKinney; Kasinathan Muralidharan; LeAnne Noll; Tara Sander; Junaid Shabbeer; Chingying Smith; Milhan Telatar; Lorraine Toji; Anand Vairavan; Carlos Vance; Karen E Weck; Alan H B Wu; Kiang-Teck J Yeo; Markus Zeller; Lisa Kalman Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2010-10-01 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: T M Dodgen; C De J Labuschagne; A van Schalkwyk; F E Steffens; A Gaedigk; A D Cromarty; M Alessandrini; M S Pepper Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2015-10-27 Impact factor: 3.550
Authors: David Villagra; John Goethe; Harold I Schwartz; Bonnie Szarek; Mohan Kocherla; Krystyna Gorowski; Andreas Windemuth; Gualberto Ruaño Journal: Biomark Med Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 2.851
Authors: Sarah C Preissner; Michael F Hoffmann; Robert Preissner; Mathias Dunkel; Andreas Gewiess; Saskia Preissner Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-12-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Gualberto Ruaño; Bonnie L Szarek; David Villagra; Krystyna Gorowski; Mohan Kocherla; Richard L Seip; John W Goethe; Harold I Schwartz Journal: Biomark Med Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 2.851