AIMS: We aim to demonstrate clinical relevance and utility of four novel drug-metabolism indices derived from a combinatory (multigene) approach to CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 allele scoring. Each index considers all three genes as complementary components of a liver enzyme drug metabolism system and uniquely benchmarks innate hepatic drug metabolism reserve or alteration through CYP450 combinatory genotype scores. METHODS: A total of 1199 psychiatric referrals were genotyped for polymorphisms in the CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 gene loci and were scored on each of the four indices. The data were used to create distributions and rankings of innate drug metabolism capacity to which individuals can be compared. Drug-specific indices are a combination of the drug metabolism indices with substrate-specific coefficients. RESULTS: The combinatory drug metabolism indices proved useful in positioning individuals relative to a population with regard to innate drug metabolism capacity prior to pharmacotherapy. Drug-specific indices generate pharmacogenetic guidance of immediate clinical relevance, and can be further modified to incorporate covariates in particular clinical cases. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that this combinatory approach represents an improvement over the current gene-by-gene reporting by providing greater scope while still allowing for the resolution of a single-gene index when needed. This method will result in novel clinical and research applications, facilitating the translation from pharmacogenomics to personalized medicine, particularly in psychiatry where many drugs are metabolized or activated by multiple CYP450 isoenzymes.
AIMS: We aim to demonstrate clinical relevance and utility of four novel drug-metabolism indices derived from a combinatory (multigene) approach to CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 allele scoring. Each index considers all three genes as complementary components of a liver enzyme drug metabolism system and uniquely benchmarks innate hepatic drug metabolism reserve or alteration through CYP450 combinatory genotype scores. METHODS: A total of 1199 psychiatric referrals were genotyped for polymorphisms in the CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 gene loci and were scored on each of the four indices. The data were used to create distributions and rankings of innate drug metabolism capacity to which individuals can be compared. Drug-specific indices are a combination of the drug metabolism indices with substrate-specific coefficients. RESULTS: The combinatory drug metabolism indices proved useful in positioning individuals relative to a population with regard to innate drug metabolism capacity prior to pharmacotherapy. Drug-specific indices generate pharmacogenetic guidance of immediate clinical relevance, and can be further modified to incorporate covariates in particular clinical cases. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that this combinatory approach represents an improvement over the current gene-by-gene reporting by providing greater scope while still allowing for the resolution of a single-gene index when needed. This method will result in novel clinical and research applications, facilitating the translation from pharmacogenomics to personalized medicine, particularly in psychiatry where many drugs are metabolized or activated by multiple CYP450 isoenzymes.
Authors: J Kirchheiner; K Brøsen; M L Dahl; L F Gram; S Kasper; I Roots; F Sjöqvist; E Spina; J Brockmöller Journal: Acta Psychiatr Scand Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 6.392
Authors: Greg Tesch; Shashi Amur; John T Schousboe; Jeffrey N Siegel; Lawrence J Lesko; Jane P F Bai Journal: AAPS J Date: 2010-03-16 Impact factor: 4.009
Authors: Gualberto Ruaño; David Villagra; Bonnie Szarek; Andreas Windemuth; Mohan Kocherla; Krystyna Gorowski; Christopher Berrezueta; Harold I Schwartz; John Goethe Journal: Biomark Med Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 2.851
Authors: Sarah C Sim; Linn Nordin; Therese M-L Andersson; Susanne Virding; Marita Olsson; Nancy L Pedersen; Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: C A Altar; J M Carhart; J D Allen; D K Hall-Flavin; B M Dechairo; J G Winner Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2015-02-17 Impact factor: 3.550
Authors: Gualberto Ruaño; David Villagra; Bonnie Szarek; Andreas Windemuth; Mohan Kocherla; Krystyna Gorowski; Christopher Berrezueta; Harold I Schwartz; John Goethe Journal: Biomark Med Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 2.851
Authors: E Peñas-Lledó; S Guillaume; M E G Naranjo; A Delgado; I Jaussent; H Blasco-Fontecilla; P Courtet; A LLerena Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2014-08-12 Impact factor: 3.550
Authors: Eva M Peñas-Lledó; Sebastien Guillaume; Fernando de Andrés; Ana Cortés-Martínez; Jonathan Dubois; Jean Pierre Kahn; Marion Leboyer; Emilie Olié; Adrián LLerena; Philippe Courtet Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2022-10-18 Impact factor: 7.989
Authors: Gualberto Ruaño; Bonnie L Szarek; David Villagra; Krystyna Gorowski; Mohan Kocherla; Richard L Seip; John W Goethe; Harold I Schwartz Journal: Biomark Med Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 2.851
Authors: Fernando de Andrés; Catalina Altamirano-Tinoco; Ronald Ramírez-Roa; Carlos F Montes-Mondragón; Pedro Dorado; Eva M Peñas-Lledó; Adrián LLerena Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2020-10-06 Impact factor: 3.550