Literature DB >> 19169102

Elastic stable intramedullary nailing versus nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures-a randomized, controlled, clinical trial.

Vinzenz Smekal1, Alexander Irenberger, Peter Struve, Markus Wambacher, Dietmar Krappinger, Franz Sebastian Kralinger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) with nonoperative treatment of fully displaced midshaft clavicular fractures in adults.
DESIGN: The study was a randomized, controlled, clinical trial.
SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty patients between 18 and 65 years of age participated and completed the study. They were randomized to either operative or nonoperative treatment with a 2-year follow-up. INTERVENTION: Thirty patients were treated with a simple shoulder sling and 30 patients with ESIN within 3 days after trauma. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Complications after operative and nonoperative treatments, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and Constant Shoulder Score for outcome measurement, and clavicular shortening.
RESULTS: Fracture union was achieved in all patients in the operative group, whereas nonunion was observed in 3 of 30 patients of the nonoperative group. Two symptomatic malunions required corrective osteotomy in the nonoperative group. Medial nail protrusion occurred in 7 cases in the operative group. Implant failure with revision surgery was necessary in 2 patients after an additional adequate trauma. DASH scores were lower in the operative group throughout the first 6 months and 2 years after trauma, with a significant difference during the first 18 weeks. Constant scores were significantly higher after 6 months and 2 years after intramedullary stabilization. Patients in the operative group showed a significant improvement of posttraumatic clavicular shortening; they were also more satisfied with cosmetic appearance and overall outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: ESIN of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures resulted in a lower rate of nonunion and delayed union, a faster return to daily activities, and a better functional outcome. Clavicular shortening was significantly lower, and overall satisfaction was higher in the operative group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19169102     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318190cf88

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  74 in total

1.  Volumetric analysis of corticocancellous bones using CT data.

Authors:  Dietmar Krappinger; Astrid von Linde; Ralf Rosenberger; Bernhard Glodny; Michael Blauth; Christian Niederwanger
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  [Midshaft clavicle fractures : A systematic review of different treatment approaches].

Authors:  R Felder-Puig; S Mathis; H Pelinka; T Mittermayr; O Pieske
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Operative versus nonoperative interventions for common fractures of the clavicle: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Tahira Devji; Ydo Kleinlugtenbelt; Nathan Evaniew; Bill Ristevski; Shoghag Khoudigian; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-11-10

4.  Management of the mid-shaft clavicle fractures using plate fixation versus intramedullary fixation: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yanbin Zhu; Ye Tian; Tianhua Dong; Wei Chen; Fei Zhang; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Clinical outcomes of midclavicular fractures treated with titanium elastic nails.

Authors:  Yun-feng Chen; Bing-fang Zeng; Yu-jie Chen; Hai-ming Wang; Jian-feng Xue; Yi-min Chai; Xue-tao Xie; Chi Zhang
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 6.  Midclavicular fracture: not just a trivial injury: current treatment options.

Authors:  Gereon Schiffer; Christoph Faymonville; Emmanouil Skouras; Jonas Andermahr; Axel Jubel
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  End cap versus no end cap in intramedullary nailing for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: influence on implant-related irritation.

Authors:  H Frima; M H J Hulsmans; R M Houwert; U Ahmed Ali; E J M M Verleisdonk; C Sommer; M van Heijl
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 3.693

8.  [Operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures : a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials].

Authors:  D Stengel
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 9.  Operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carl-Henrik Rehn; Martin Kirkegaard; Bjarke Viberg; Morten Schultz Larsen
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-12-10

Review 10.  Malunion after midshaft clavicle fractures in adults.

Authors:  Robert J Hillen; Bart J Burger; Rudolf G Pöll; Arthur de Gast; C Michael Robinson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.