Literature DB >> 14654315

Caesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy.

Gordon C S Smith1, Jill P Pell, Richard Dobbie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Caesarean section is associated with an increased risk of disorders of placentation in subsequent pregnancies, but effects on the rate of antepartum stillbirth are unknown. We aimed to establish whether previous caesarean delivery is associated with an increased risk of antepartum stillbirth.
METHODS: We linked pregnancy discharge data from the Scottish Morbidity Record (1980-98) and the Scottish Stillbirth and Infant Death Enquiry (1985-98). We estimated the relative risk of antepartum stillbirth in second pregnancies using time-to-event analyses.
FINDINGS: For 120633 singleton second births, there were 68 antepartum stillbirths in 17754 women previously delivered by caesarean section (2.39 per 10000 women per week) and 244 in 102879 women previously delivered vaginally (1.44; p<0.001). Risk of unexplained stillbirth associated with previous caesarean delivery differed significantly with gestational age (p=0.04); the excess risk was apparent from 34 weeks (hazard ratio 2.23 [95% CI 1.48-3.36]). Risk was not attenuated by adjustment for maternal characteristics or outcome of the first pregnancy (2.74 [1.74-4.30]). The absolute risk of unexplained stillbirth at or after 39 weeks' gestation was 1.1 per 1000 women who had had a previous caesarean section and 0.5 per 1000 in those who had not. The difference was due mostly to an excess of unexplained stillbirths among women previously delivered by caesarean section.
INTERPRETATION: Delivery by caesarean section in the first pregnancy could increase the risk of unexplained stillbirth in the second. In women with one previous caesarean delivery, the risk of unexplained antepartum stillbirth at or after 39 weeks' gestation is about double the risk of stillbirth or neonatal death from intrapartum uterine rupture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14654315     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14896-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  62 in total

1.  Planned elective cesarean section: a reasonable choice for some women?

Authors:  Mary E Hannah
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-03-02       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Efficacy of transvaginal debridement and repair surgery for cesarean scar pregnancy: a cohort study compared with uterine artery embolism.

Authors:  Yu-Qing Chen; Hua-Shan Liu; Wen-Xin Li; Chen Deng; Xiao-Wen Hu; Pei-Jun Kuang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

3.  Short term outcomes lead to long term questions.

Authors:  Sarah J Buckley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-09-24

4.  Not safer and not cheaper?

Authors:  Michael Klein
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Stillbirth in the pregnancy complicated by diabetes.

Authors:  Roman Starikov; Donald Dudley; Uma M Reddy
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.810

6.  Neonatal outcomes after demonstrated fetal lung maturity before 39 weeks of gestation.

Authors:  Elizabeth Bates; Dwight J Rouse; Merry Lynn Mann; Victoria Chapman; Waldemar A Carlo; Alan T N Tita
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Maternal and neonatal effects of caesarean section.

Authors:  Allison Shorten
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-10-30

8.  Preventive induction of labor: potential benefits if proved effective.

Authors:  Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

9.  The impact of the active management of risk in pregnancy at term on birth outcomes: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  James M Nicholson; Samuel Parry; Aaron B Caughey; Sarah Rosen; Allison Keen; George A Macones
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Maternal and newborn outcomes after a prior cesarean birth by planned mode of delivery and history of prior vaginal birth in British Columbia: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Celeste D Bickford; Patricia A Janssen
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-04-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.