Literature DB >> 10067011

Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation: a prospective randomized trial.

K Amano1, K Saito, T Shoda, A Tani, H Yoshihara, M Nishijima.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the safety of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective randomized study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Uncomplicated nulliparas (N = 194) were randomly assigned at 36 weeks of gestation. Labor was electively induced in 63 women at 39 weeks of gestation in the active management group (I group, N = 98). Spontaneous labor onset was expected with semi-weekly nonstress test (NST) and amniotic fluid index (AFI) by 42 weeks of gestation in the expectant group (E group, N = 96). Perinatal events were compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: A significantly higher incidence of meconium-stained amnios (19.4% vs 3.2%) and fetal resuscitation (16.7% vs 4.8%) was found in the E group than in the I group. Also, although a significantly higher incidence of epidural analgesia was noted in the I group (89%) than in the E group (54%) (labor onset > or = 39 weeks, N = 72), the duration of the 1st stage was shorter in I group and the duration of the 2nd stage was not significantly different. No other significant difference was noted between the 2 groups in terms of the rate of C-section, blood loss, incidence of pathological FHR, birth weight, Apgar score, umbilical arterial pH, or admission to NICU.
CONCLUSION: Active management of labor at 39 weeks could be made as safely as expectant management with modified biophysical profile monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10067011     DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.1999.tb01119.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res        ISSN: 1341-8076            Impact factor:   1.730


  6 in total

1.  The impact of the active management of risk in pregnancy at term on birth outcomes: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  James M Nicholson; Samuel Parry; Aaron B Caughey; Sarah Rosen; Allison Keen; George A Macones
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Trends in elective labor induction for six United States health plans, 2001-2007.

Authors:  Sascha Dublin; Karin E Johnson; Rod L Walker; Lyndsay A Avalos; Susan E Andrade; Sarah J Beaton; Robert L Davis; Lisa J Herrinton; Pamala A Pawloski; Marsha A Raebel; David H Smith; Sengwee Toh; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 3.  Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.

Authors:  A Metin Gülmezoglu; Caroline A Crowther; Philippa Middleton; Emer Heatley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-06-13

4.  Active management of risk in nulliparous pregnancy at term: association between a higher preventive labor induction rate and improved birth outcomes.

Authors:  James M Nicholson; Morghan H Stenson; Lisa C Kellar; Aaron B Caughey; George A Macones
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-01-24       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation.

Authors:  Philippa Middleton; Emily Shepherd; Jonathan Morris; Caroline A Crowther; Judith C Gomersall
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-15

Review 6.  Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.

Authors:  Philippa Middleton; Emily Shepherd; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.