Literature DB >> 19166673

Availability and consumption of competitive foods in US public schools.

Mary Kay Fox1, Anne Gordon, Renée Nogales, Ander Wilson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With ongoing efforts to develop and implement school wellness policies, there is a need for information about the availability and consumption of competitive foods in schools.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the availability of competitive foods in US public schools, consumption of competitive foods by children, and contributions of competitive foods to energy intakes.
DESIGN: The study used data from the third School Nutrition Dietary Assessment Study, a cross-sectional study that included a national sample of public school districts, schools, and children in the 2004-2005 school year. On-site observations were used to document the availability of competitive foods and a 24-hour recall was used to assess children's consumption of competitive foods. SUBJECTS/
SETTING: The study included 287 schools and 2,314 children in grades 1 through 12. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Most analyses were limited to estimation of means and proportions. Two-tailed t tests were used to test the significance of differences between children who did and did not eat a school lunch.
RESULTS: In school year 2004-2005, competitive foods were widely available in public schools. Overall, 40% of children consumed one or more competitive foods on a typical school day. The most commonly consumed competitive foods were foods and beverages that were low in nutrients and energy-dense. Children who ate a school lunch were significantly less likely than children who did not eat a school lunch to consume competitive foods (36% vs 45%; P<0.01); however, the leading competitive food choices for both groups of children were foods that were low in nutrients and energy-dense. On average, competitive food consumers who ate school lunches obtained 159 calories from competitive foods that were low in nutrients and energy-dense, compared with 201 calories for competitive food consumers who did not eat school lunches (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In school year 2004-2005, competitive foods were widely available and consumed in US public schools and the most commonly consumed competitive foods were low in nutrients and energy-dense. These data support the need for improvements in school food environments and policies and provide a useful baseline for monitoring change as schools work to make these improvements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19166673     DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8223


  41 in total

1.  Lessons learned from evaluations of California's statewide school nutrition standards.

Authors:  Gail Woodward-Lopez; Wendi Gosliner; Sarah E Samuels; Lisa Craypo; Janice Kao; Patricia B Crawford
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Food sold in school vending machines is associated with overall student dietary intake.

Authors:  Alisha J Rovner; Tonja R Nansel; Jing Wang; Ronald J Iannotti
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.012

Review 3.  Childhood obesity and adult morbidities.

Authors:  Frank M Biro; Michelle Wien
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Industry self-regulation to improve student health: quantifying changes in beverage shipments to schools.

Authors:  Robert F Wescott; Brendan M Fitzpatrick; Elizabeth Phillips
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  The Impact of 1 Year of Healthier School Food Policies on Students' Diets During and Outside of the School Day.

Authors:  Juliana F W Cohen; Mary T Gorski Findling; Lindsay Rosenfeld; Lauren Smith; Eric B Rimm; Jessica A Hoffman
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 4.910

6.  Association between competitive food and beverage policies in elementary schools and childhood overweight/obesity trends: differences by neighborhood socioeconomic resources.

Authors:  Emma V Sanchez-Vaznaugh; Brisa N Sánchez; Patricia B Crawford; Susan Egerter
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 16.193

7.  Demographic and financial characteristics of school districts with low and high à la Carte sales in rural Kansas Public Schools.

Authors:  Nicole L Nollen; Kim S Kimminau; Niaman Nazir
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2011-06

8.  How do we actually put smarter snacks in schools? NOURISH (Nutrition Opportunities to Understand Reforms Involving Student Health) conversations with food-service directors.

Authors:  Lindsay E Rosenfeld; Juliana Fw Cohen; Mary T Gorski; Andrés J Lessing; Lauren Smith; Eric B Rimm; Jessica A Hoffman
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 4.022

Review 9.  The development of sweet taste: From biology to hedonics.

Authors:  Julie A Mennella; Nuala K Bobowski; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.514

10.  A national evaluation of the impact of state policies on competitive foods in schools.

Authors:  Meenakshi M Fernandes
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.