Literature DB >> 19164453

A comparison of models used to predict MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 mutation carriers.

C J Pouchet1, N Wong, G Chong, M J Sheehan, G Schneider, B Rosen-Sheidley, W Foulkes, M Tischkowitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: MMRpro, prediction of mutations in MLH1 and MLH2 (PREMM(1,2)) and MMRpredict are models which were developed to predict the probability that an individual carries a Lynch syndrome-causing mutation. Each model utilizes data from personal and family histories of cancer. To date, no studies have compared these models in a cancer genetics clinic. The purpose of this study was to determine each model's ability to predict the probability of carrying a Lynch syndrome-causing mutation in individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer and to determine their clinical applicability.
METHODS: We obtained family pedigrees from 81 individuals who presented for Lynch syndrome testing due to a personal and/or family history of cancer. Data from each pedigree were entered into the models and analyzed using SPSS.
RESULTS: We found that MMRpredict, PREMM(1,2) and MMRpro showed similar performances with areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.731, 0.765 and 0.732, respectively. MMRpro showed the least dispersion of mutation probability estimates with a P value of 0.205, compared with 0.034 for PREMM(1,2) and 0.001 for MMRpredict.
CONCLUSION: We found all three carried out well in a cancer genetics setting, with PREMM(1,2) giving slightly better estimates. There were some significant discrepancies between the models in cases where the proband had endometrial cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19164453     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdn686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  12 in total

1.  The PREMM(1,2,6) model predicts risk of MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 germline mutations based on cancer history.

Authors:  Fay Kastrinos; Ewout W Steyerberg; Rowena Mercado; Judith Balmaña; Spring Holter; Steven Gallinger; Kimberly D Siegmund; James M Church; Mark A Jenkins; Noralane M Lindor; Stephen N Thibodeau; Lynn Anne Burbidge; Richard J Wenstrup; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Performance of Lynch syndrome predictive models in quantifying the likelihood of germline mutations in patients with abnormal MLH1 immunoexpression.

Authors:  Verónica Cabreira; Carla Pinto; Manuela Pinheiro; Paula Lopes; Ana Peixoto; Catarina Santos; Isabel Veiga; Patrícia Rocha; Pedro Pinto; Rui Henrique; Manuel R Teixeira
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Performance of Lynch syndrome predictive models in a multi-center US referral population.

Authors:  Omar Khan; Amie Blanco; Peggy Conrad; Cassandra Gulden; Tovah Z Moss; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Sonia S Kupfer; Jonathan Terdiman
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 4.  Inherited colorectal cancer syndromes.

Authors:  Fay Kastrinos; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.360

5.  Underdiagnosis of Lynch syndrome involves more than family history criteria.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Rachel Schiesser; Gobind Anand; Peter A Richardson; Hashem B El-Serag
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 6.  Prediction models in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Fay Kastrinos; Judith Balmaña; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Comparison of Prediction Models for Lynch Syndrome Among Individuals With Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Fay Kastrinos; Rohit P Ojha; Celine Leenen; Carmelita Alvero; Rowena C Mercado; Judith Balmaña; Irene Valenzuela; Francesc Balaguer; Roger Green; Noralane M Lindor; Stephen N Thibodeau; Polly Newcomb; Aung Ko Win; Mark Jenkins; Daniel D Buchanan; Lucio Bertario; Paola Sala; Heather Hampel; Sapna Syngal; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Performance of PREMM(1,2,6), MMRpredict, and MMRpro in detecting Lynch syndrome among endometrial cancer cases.

Authors:  Rowena C Mercado; Heather Hampel; Fay Kastrinos; Ewout Steyerberg; Judith Balmana; Elena Stoffel; David E Cohn; Floor J Backes; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins; Noralane M Lindor; Graham Casey; Robert Haile; Subha Madhavan; Albert de la Chapelle; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Predictive models for mutations in mismatch repair genes: implication for genetic counseling in developing countries.

Authors:  Erika Maria Monteiro Santos; Mev Dominguez Valentin; Felipe Carneiro; Ligia Petrolini de Oliveira; Fabio de Oliveira Ferreira; Samuel Aguiar Junior; Wilson Toshihiko Nakagawa; Israel Gomy; Victor Evangelista de Faria Ferraz; Wilson Araujo da Silva Junior; Dirce Maria Carraro; Benedito Mauro Rossi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Hereditary Syndromes Manifesting as Endometrial Carcinoma: How Can Pathological Features Aid Risk Assessment?

Authors:  Adele Wong; Joanne Ngeow
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.