BACKGROUND & AIMS: Liver biopsy is required to diagnose nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in patients with suspected non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD); recent studies suggested significant sampling variability. Using percutaneous liver biopsy samples from patients with suspected NAFLD, we examined the relationship between histological yield and length of biopsies, number of cores and number of independent readings. METHODS: Three cores of liver tissue were collected, by percutaneous liver biopsy, from each of 50 patients suspected to have NAFLD. The diagnostic yield (percent with definite NASH) and other histological findings from 2 independent, blinded examinations of 2 cores and from all 3 cores combined were assessed. RESULTS: Steatosis, lobular inflammation and fibrosis scores were significantly higher when 3 samples were analyzed, compared with 2. However, between groups, there were no significant differences in hepatocyte ballooning, proportion with an NAFLD activity score > or =4 or proportion with definite NASH (57% vs 61%, P = .3). The length of the biopsy sample correlated with percentage of patients found to have definite NASH (29%, 46%, 56%, and 65% in biopsies measuring <10 mm, 10-14 mm, 15-24 mm, and > or =25 mm, respectively; P < .0001). When biopsy specimens were read twice by the same pathologist, the composite of the 2 independent readings yielded a significantly higher yield for several histological features, compared with the first reading. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant relationship between histological yield and sample length and number of independent readings of liver biopsy samples. More studies are needed to optimize the strategy for liver biopsy, to more effectively assess histology in patients with suspected NAFLD.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Liver biopsy is required to diagnose nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in patients with suspected non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD); recent studies suggested significant sampling variability. Using percutaneous liver biopsy samples from patients with suspected NAFLD, we examined the relationship between histological yield and length of biopsies, number of cores and number of independent readings. METHODS: Three cores of liver tissue were collected, by percutaneous liver biopsy, from each of 50 patients suspected to have NAFLD. The diagnostic yield (percent with definite NASH) and other histological findings from 2 independent, blinded examinations of 2 cores and from all 3 cores combined were assessed. RESULTS:Steatosis, lobular inflammation and fibrosis scores were significantly higher when 3 samples were analyzed, compared with 2. However, between groups, there were no significant differences in hepatocyte ballooning, proportion with an NAFLD activity score > or =4 or proportion with definite NASH (57% vs 61%, P = .3). The length of the biopsy sample correlated with percentage of patients found to have definite NASH (29%, 46%, 56%, and 65% in biopsies measuring <10 mm, 10-14 mm, 15-24 mm, and > or =25 mm, respectively; P < .0001). When biopsy specimens were read twice by the same pathologist, the composite of the 2 independent readings yielded a significantly higher yield for several histological features, compared with the first reading. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant relationship between histological yield and sample length and number of independent readings of liver biopsy samples. More studies are needed to optimize the strategy for liver biopsy, to more effectively assess histology in patients with suspected NAFLD.
Authors: Jeffrey D Browning; Lidia S Szczepaniak; Robert Dobbins; Pamela Nuremberg; Jay D Horton; Jonathan C Cohen; Scott M Grundy; Helen H Hobbs Journal: Hepatology Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Terry Gramlich; David E Kleiner; Arthur J McCullough; Christi A Matteoni; Navdeep Boparai; Zobair M Younossi Journal: Hum Pathol Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 3.466
Authors: Steven P Larson; Steven P Bowers; Nicole A Palekar; John A Ward; Joseph P Pulcini; Stephen A Harrison Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2007-08-16 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Z M Younossi; T Gramlich; Y C Liu; C Matteoni; M Petrelli; J Goldblum; L Rybicki; A J McCullough Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 1998-06 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Ravi Juluri; Raj Vuppalanchi; John Olson; Aynur Unalp; Mark L Van Natta; Oscar W Cummings; James Tonascia; Naga Chalasani Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 3.062
Authors: Cheng William Hong; Tanya Wolfson; Ethan Z Sy; Alexandra N Schlein; Jonathan C Hooker; Soudabeh Fazeli Dehkordy; Gavin Hamilton; Scott B Reeder; Rohit Loomba; Claude B Sirlin Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-08-26 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Y A Patel; E J Gifford; L M Glass; R McNeil; M J Turner; B Han; D Provenzale; S S Choi; C A Moylan; C M Hunt Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2017-11-08 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Ahmed A Harouni; Ahmed M Gharib; Nael F Osman; Caryn Morse; Theo Heller; Khaled Z Abd-Elmoniem Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-07-31 Impact factor: 4.668