BACKGROUND: With its increasing incidence, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is of particular concern in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). AIMS: To evaluate risk factors for advanced fibrosis in biopsy-proven NAFLD in the VHA, to identify patients at risk for adverse outcomes. METHODS: In randomly selected cases from VHA databases (2005-2015), we performed a retrospective case-control study in adults with biopsy-defined NAFLD or normal liver. RESULTS: Of 2091 patients reviewed, 399 met inclusion criteria. Normal controls (n = 65) had normal liver function. The four NAFLD cohorts included: NAFL steatosis (n = 76), nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) without fibrosis (n = 68), NAFLD/NASH stage 1-3 fibrosis (n = 82), and NAFLD/NASH cirrhosis (n = 70). NAFLD with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was separately identified (n = 38). Most patients were older White men. NAFLD patients with any fibrosis were on average severely obese (BMI>35 kg/m2 ). Diabetes (54.4%-79.6%) and hypertension (85.8%-100%) were more common in NAFLD with fibrosis or HCC. Across NAFLD, 12.3%-19.5% were enrolled in diet/exercise programs and 0%-2.6% had bariatric surgery. Hispanics exhibited higher rates of NASH (20.6%), while Blacks had low NAFLD rates (1.4%-11.8%), particularly NAFLD cirrhosis and HCC (1.4%-2.6%). Diabetes (OR 11.8, P < .001) and BMI (OR 1.4, P < .001) were the most significant predictors of advanced fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: In the VHA, diabetes and severe obesity increased risk for advanced fibrosis in NAFLD. Of these patients, only a small proportion (~20%) had enrolled in diet/exercise programs or had bariatric surgery (~2%). These results suggest that providers should focus/tailor interventions to improve outcomes, particularly in those with diabetes and severe obesity.
BACKGROUND: With its increasing incidence, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is of particular concern in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). AIMS: To evaluate risk factors for advanced fibrosis in biopsy-proven NAFLD in the VHA, to identify patients at risk for adverse outcomes. METHODS: In randomly selected cases from VHA databases (2005-2015), we performed a retrospective case-control study in adults with biopsy-defined NAFLD or normal liver. RESULTS: Of 2091 patients reviewed, 399 met inclusion criteria. Normal controls (n = 65) had normal liver function. The four NAFLD cohorts included: NAFLsteatosis (n = 76), nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) without fibrosis (n = 68), NAFLD/NASH stage 1-3 fibrosis (n = 82), and NAFLD/NASH cirrhosis (n = 70). NAFLD with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was separately identified (n = 38). Most patients were older White men. NAFLD patients with any fibrosis were on average severely obese (BMI>35 kg/m2 ). Diabetes (54.4%-79.6%) and hypertension (85.8%-100%) were more common in NAFLD with fibrosis or HCC. Across NAFLD, 12.3%-19.5% were enrolled in diet/exercise programs and 0%-2.6% had bariatric surgery. Hispanics exhibited higher rates of NASH (20.6%), while Blacks had low NAFLD rates (1.4%-11.8%), particularly NAFLD cirrhosis and HCC (1.4%-2.6%). Diabetes (OR 11.8, P < .001) and BMI (OR 1.4, P < .001) were the most significant predictors of advanced fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: In the VHA, diabetes and severe obesity increased risk for advanced fibrosis in NAFLD. Of these patients, only a small proportion (~20%) had enrolled in diet/exercise programs or had bariatric surgery (~2%). These results suggest that providers should focus/tailor interventions to improve outcomes, particularly in those with diabetes and severe obesity.
Authors: Brent A Neuschwander-Tetri; Jeanne M Clark; Nathan M Bass; Mark L Van Natta; Aynur Unalp-Arida; James Tonascia; Claudia O Zein; Elizabeth M Brunt; David E Kleiner; Arthur J McCullough; Arun J Sanyal; Anna Mae Diehl; Joel E Lavine; Naga Chalasani; Kris V Kowdley Journal: Hepatology Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: David Goldberg; Ivo C Ditah; Kia Saeian; Mona Lalehzari; Andrew Aronsohn; Emmanuel C Gorospe; Michael Charlton Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2017-01-11 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Edwin B Fisher; Muchieh Maggy Coufal; Humberto Parada; Jennifer B Robinette; Patrick Y Tang; Diana M Urlaub; Claudia Castillo; Laura M Guzman-Corrales; Sayaka Hino; Jaimie Hunter; Ariana W Katz; Yael R Symes; Heidi P Worley; Cuirong Xu Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 2014-01-02 Impact factor: 21.981
Authors: Sahil Mittal; Hashem B El-Serag; Yvonne H Sada; Fasiha Kanwal; Zhigang Duan; Sarah Temple; Sarah B May; Jennifer R Kramer; Peter A Richardson; Jessica A Davila Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2015-07-18 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Vanessa Rodríguez; Allen D Andrade; Rocio García-Retamero; Ramanakumar Anam; Remberto Rodríguez; Miriam Lisigurski; Joseph Sharit; Jorge G Ruiz Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2013
Authors: Bubu A Banini; Samarth Patel; Jonathan W Yu; Le Kang; Christopher Bailey; Brian J Strife; Mohammad S Siddiqui; Vaishali Patel; Scott C Matherly; Hannah Lee; Shawn Lewis; Reena Cherian; Richard T Stravitz; Velimir Luketic; Arun J Sanyal; Richard K Sterling Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 3.174
Authors: Yuval A Patel; Elizabeth J Gifford; Lisa M Glass; Marsha J Turner; Byungjoo Han; Cynthia A Moylan; Steve Choi; Ayako Suzuki; Dawn Provenzale; Christine M Hunt Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2018-05-19 Impact factor: 3.199