Literature DB >> 19159747

Magnamosis: magnetic compression anastomosis with comparison to suture and staple techniques.

Ramin Jamshidi1, Jacob T Stephenson, Jared G Clay, Kullada O Pichakron, Michael R Harrison.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: An ideal anastomosis between hollow viscera should be easily performed, strong, and operator independent. We hypothesized that transluminal attraction between magnets in the intestine could be harnessed to create an intestinal compression anastomosis (magnamosis) with these characteristics. We further hypothesized that variation of attraction force and geometry of compression would affect the quality of the intestinal anastomosis.
METHODS: We designed a self-orienting device composed of 2 neodymium-iron-boron magnets affixed to polytetrafluoroethylene moldings. Two topologies were evaluated: one designed with 'uniform' compression and the other with 'gradient' compression. Sixteen young adult pigs (Sus scrofa) underwent laparotomy with creation of a magnetic side-to-side anastomosis: 8 with the uniform device and 8 with the gradient device. Each also had a stapled anastomosis, and 5 had an additional hand-sutured anastomosis. Animals were euthanized at 1, 2, and 3 weeks after operation, then anastomoses were compared on the basis of gross appearance, histology, functional radiography, and mechanical integrity.
RESULTS: All magnetic devices formed patent anastomoses without leak. One stapled anastomosis resulted in a contained leak. Mechanical integrity of magnetic anastomoses was not statistically significantly different from staple or suture counterparts, and there was a trend toward greater strength with magnetic anastomoses. Comparison between device types revealed the gradient device trended toward greater strength and earlier patency (67% vs 33% at 1 week). There was no evidence of stenosis, and histologic examination demonstrated tissue remodeling with mucosal and serosal apposition across the magnamoses.
CONCLUSIONS: The magnetic compression anastomosis (magnamosis) device is a safe and effective means of sutureless full-thickness intestinal anastomosis with serosal apposition in a pig model. Gradient compression is superior to uniform compression. This technique is compatible with endoscopic and natural orifice approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19159747     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.10.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  23 in total

Review 1.  Compression anastomoses in colorectal surgery: a review.

Authors:  A P Zbar; Y Nir; A Weizman; M Rabau; A Senagore
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Magnetic compression gastrostomy in the rat.

Authors:  Ibrahim Uygun; Mehmet Hanifi Okur; Hasan Cimen; Aysenur Keles; Ozben Yalcin; Hayrettin Ozturk; Selcuk Otcu
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 3.  Techniques for colorectal anastomosis.

Authors:  Yik Hong Ho; Mohamed Ahmed Tawfik Ashour
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Hybrid fluorescent magnetic gastrojejunostomy: an experimental feasibility study in the porcine model and human cadaver.

Authors:  Ryohei Watanabe; Manuel Barberio; Shingo Kanaji; Alfonso Lapergola; Anila Hoskere Ashoka; Bohdan Andreiuk; Ludovica Guerriero; Margherita Pizzicannella; Barbara Seeliger; Yoshihisa Saida; Hironori Kaneko; Marc Worreth; Alend Saadi; Jacques Marescaux; Andrey S Klymchenko; Michele Diana
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Magnamosis: a novel technique for the management of rectal atresia.

Authors:  Katie W Russell; Michael D Rollins; G Peter Feola; Eric R Scaife
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-08-05

6.  Magnetic Anastomosis Rings to Create Portacaval Shunt in a Canine Model of Portal Hypertension.

Authors:  Hao-Hua Wang; Jia Ma; Shan-Pei Wang; Feng Ma; Jian-Wen Lu; Xiang-Hua Xu; Yi Lv; Xiao-Peng Yan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Choledochojejunostomy with an innovative magnetic compressive anastomosis: How to determine optimal pressure?

Authors:  Fei Xue; Hong-Chang Guo; Jian-Peng Li; Jian-Wen Lu; Hao-Hua Wang; Feng Ma; Ya-Xiong Liu; Yi Lv
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  A sutureless method for digestive tract reconstruction during pancreaticoduodenectomy in a dog model.

Authors:  Xiaohai Cui; Peng Lei; Shiqi Liu; Xuemin Liu; Zheng Wu; Yi Lv
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-01-15

9.  Experience of Endoscopic Jejunojejunostomy for Anastomotic Obstruction After Subtotal Gastrectomy Using Magnetic Compression Anastomosis.

Authors:  Hideaki Kawabata; Naonori Inoue; Yuji Okazaki; Daiki Sone; Katsutoshi Yamaguchi; Yuki Ueda; Misuzu Hitomi; Masatoshi Miyata; Shigehiro Motoi; Takashi Fuse; Kenichirou Fukuda; Yoshihiro Shimizu
Journal:  Gastroenterology Res       Date:  2019-10-04

10.  Repair of esophageal atresia with proximal fistula using endoscopic magnetic compression anastomosis (magnamosis) after staged lengthening.

Authors:  Robert M Dorman; Kaveh Vali; Carroll M Harmon; Mario Zaritzky; Kathryn D Bass
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 1.827

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.