BACKGROUND: The introduction of optical coherence tomography (OCT) as an intracoronary imaging modality has allowed accurate assessment of strut apposition and neointimal tissue coverage. This study set out to assess the inter and intraobserver variability of measurements of acute stent apposition and strut tissue coverage using OCT. METHODS: Thirty patients were studied (14 immediately after stent implantation and 16 during follow-up angiography [mean of 4.7+/-2.8 months]) using OCT (LightLab, Westford, Massachusetts, US). Data analysis was performed by 2 experienced observers. Struts were classified as "embedded", "protruding" or "malapposed" to the vessel well and recorded as percentage of total struts. Intimal coverage at follow-up was measured as the thickness of tissue covering each strut expressed in mum. Intra and interobserver variability was assessed by Bland-Altman plots and by calculation of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: An average of 3967 struts was examined by each observer and, overall, 53.7% of struts was embedded, 36.4% protruding and 9.9% malapposed. Low intraobserver variability for all measures of strut apposition was found, with repeatability coefficients that ranged between 5.1% and 9.3% and ICC exceeding 95% in all cases. Interobserver variability was also low (repeatability coefficients 6.6-10.8 and ICC>91.3%). Mean intimal thickness in the follow-up group was 172.5 microm. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated a low intraobserver and interobserver variability for intimal thickness, with repeatability coefficients 26.7 mum and 24.1 mum, respectively and ICC exceeding 98.6% for both. CONCLUSIONS: Low intra and interobserver variability can be expected when analyzing OCT data for stent apposition and tissue coverage. This supports the validity of OCT as a clinical and research tool in the setting of intracoronary stent imaging. Copyright 2010. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
BACKGROUND: The introduction of optical coherence tomography (OCT) as an intracoronary imaging modality has allowed accurate assessment of strut apposition and neointimal tissue coverage. This study set out to assess the inter and intraobserver variability of measurements of acute stent apposition and strut tissue coverage using OCT. METHODS: Thirty patients were studied (14 immediately after stent implantation and 16 during follow-up angiography [mean of 4.7+/-2.8 months]) using OCT (LightLab, Westford, Massachusetts, US). Data analysis was performed by 2 experienced observers. Struts were classified as "embedded", "protruding" or "malapposed" to the vessel well and recorded as percentage of total struts. Intimal coverage at follow-up was measured as the thickness of tissue covering each strut expressed in mum. Intra and interobserver variability was assessed by Bland-Altman plots and by calculation of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: An average of 3967 struts was examined by each observer and, overall, 53.7% of struts was embedded, 36.4% protruding and 9.9% malapposed. Low intraobserver variability for all measures of strut apposition was found, with repeatability coefficients that ranged between 5.1% and 9.3% and ICC exceeding 95% in all cases. Interobserver variability was also low (repeatability coefficients 6.6-10.8 and ICC>91.3%). Mean intimal thickness in the follow-up group was 172.5 microm. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated a low intraobserver and interobserver variability for intimal thickness, with repeatability coefficients 26.7 mum and 24.1 mum, respectively and ICC exceeding 98.6% for both. CONCLUSIONS: Low intra and interobserver variability can be expected when analyzing OCT data for stent apposition and tissue coverage. This supports the validity of OCT as a clinical and research tool in the setting of intracoronary stent imaging. Copyright 2010. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
Authors: J Jacob Mancuso; David L Halaney; Sahar Elahi; Derek Ho; Tianyi Wang; Yongjian Ouyang; Jouke Dijkstra; Thomas E Milner; Marc D Feldman Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 3.170
Authors: Lei Song; Gary S Mintz; Dong Yin; Myong Hwa Yamamoto; Chee Yang Chin; Mitsuaki Matsumura; Khady Fall; Ajay J Kirtane; Manish A Parikh; Jeffrey W Moses; Ziad A Ali; Richard A Shlofmitz; Akiko Maehara Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-03-09 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Alex Gabriele; Valeria Marco; Laura Gatto; Giulia Paoletti; Luca Di Vito; Fausto Castriota; Enrico Romagnoli; Andrea Ricciardi; Francesco Prati Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-06-14 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Bo Wang; Jimmy L Su; Andrei B Karpiouk; Konstantin V Sokolov; Richard W Smalling; Stanislav Y Emelianov Journal: IEEE J Quantum Electron Date: 2010-06-03 Impact factor: 2.318