Literature DB >> 19153565

How to critically appraise an article.

Jane M Young1, Michael J Solomon.   

Abstract

Critical appraisal is a systematic process used to identify the strengths and weaknesses of a research article in order to assess the usefulness and validity of research findings. The most important components of a critical appraisal are an evaluation of the appropriateness of the study design for the research question and a careful assessment of the key methodological features of this design. Other factors that also should be considered include the suitability of the statistical methods used and their subsequent interpretation, potential conflicts of interest and the relevance of the research to one's own practice. This Review presents a 10-step guide to critical appraisal that aims to assist clinicians to identify the most relevant high-quality studies available to guide their clinical practice.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19153565     DOI: 10.1038/ncpgasthep1331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1743-4378


  38 in total

1.  Ethical issues concerning the relationships between medical practitioners and the pharmaceutical industry.

Authors:  Paul A Komesaroff; Ian H Kerridge
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2002-02-04       Impact factor: 7.738

2.  The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet; Jeroen G Lijmer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-01-07       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Improving the evidence base in surgery: sources of bias in surgical studies.

Authors:  Jane M Young; Michael J Solomon
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.872

4.  Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study.

Authors:  J A Knottnerus; J W Muris
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 5.  Reader's guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 1. Role and design.

Authors:  Paula A Rochon; Jerry H Gurwitz; Kathy Sykora; Muhammad Mamdani; David L Streiner; Susan Garfinkel; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Geoffrey M Anderson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-04-16

6.  Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement.

Authors:  Gilda Piaggio; Diana R Elbourne; Douglas G Altman; Stuart J Pocock; Stephen J W Evans
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-03-08       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Critical appraisal for public health: a new checklist.

Authors:  Richard F Heller; Arpana Verma; Islay Gemmell; Roger Harrison; Judy Hart; Richard Edwards
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 2.427

8.  Randomised controlled trial of the READER method of critical appraisal in general practice.

Authors:  D MacAuley; E McCrum; C Brown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-04-11

9.  Should we be performing more randomized controlled trials evaluating surgical operations?

Authors:  M J Solomon; R S McLeod
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials.

Authors:  D Moher; K F Schulz; D G Altman
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2001-04-20       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Radiological and clinical outcomes of novel Ti/PEEK combined spinal fusion cages: a systematic review and preclinical evaluation.

Authors:  Yusuf Assem; Ralph J Mobbs; Matthew H Pelletier; Kevin Phan; William R Walsh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Reporting a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic study: a journal's perspective.

Authors:  Kris M Jamsen; Sarah C McLeay; Michael A Barras; Bruce Green
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Opportunities for engaging low-income, vulnerable populations in health care: a systematic review of homeless persons' access to and use of information technologies.

Authors:  D Keith McInnes; Alice E Li; Timothy P Hogan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  A systematic review of the literature on 'medication wastage': an exploration of causative factors and effect of interventions.

Authors:  Lorna Marie West; Lesley Diack; Maria Cordina; Derek Stewart
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2014-07-19

5.  Strength-based interventions for HIV prevention and sexual risk reduction among girls and young women: A resilience-focused systematic review.

Authors:  Ashleigh LoVette; Caroline Kuo; Abigail Harrison
Journal:  Glob Public Health       Date:  2019-04-07

Review 6.  Stress and anxiety management strategies in health professions' simulation training: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Jeanette Ignacio; Diana Dolmans; Albert Scherpbier; Jan-Joost Rethans; Sally Chan; Sok Ying Liaw
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2016-04-06

7.  SYMPOSIUM REPORT: An Evidence-Based Approach to IBS and CIC: Applying New Advances to Daily Practice: A Review of an Adjunct Clinical Symposium of the American College of Gastroenterology Meeting October 16, 2016 • Las Vegas, Nevada.

Authors:  William D Chey
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2017-02

8.  Prospective diagnostic test accuracy comparison of computed tomography during arterial portography and Primovist magnetic resonance imaging in the pre-operative assessment of colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Authors:  Jai S Bagia; Alan Chai; Roger Chou; Christopher Chu; John Rouse; Elizabeth Sinclair; Leon Vonthethoff; Armando Teixeira-Pinto
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Critical Appraisal Toolkit (CAT) for assessing multiple types of evidence.

Authors:  D Moralejo; T Ogunremi; K Dunn
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2017-09-07

10.  Emergency physicians' perceptions of critical appraisal skills: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Sumintra Wood; Jacqueline Paulis; Angela Chen
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.