Literature DB >> 29770086

Critical Appraisal Toolkit (CAT) for assessing multiple types of evidence.

D Moralejo1, T Ogunremi2, K Dunn2.   

Abstract

Healthcare professionals are often expected to critically appraise research evidence in order to make recommendations for practice and policy development. Here we describe the Critical Appraisal Toolkit (CAT) currently used by the Public Health Agency of Canada. The CAT consists of: algorithms to identify the type of study design, three separate tools (for appraisal of analytic studies, descriptive studies and literature reviews), additional tools to support the appraisal process, and guidance for summarizing evidence and drawing conclusions about a body of evidence. Although the toolkit was created to assist in the development of national guidelines related to infection prevention and control, clinicians, policy makers and students can use it to guide appraisal of any health-related quantitative research. Participants in a pilot test completed a total of 101 critical appraisals and found that the CAT was user-friendly and helpful in the process of critical appraisal. Feedback from participants of the pilot test of the CAT informed further revisions prior to its release. The CAT adds to the arsenal of available tools and can be especially useful when the best available evidence comes from non-clinical trials and/or studies with weak designs, where other tools may not be easily applied.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29770086      PMCID: PMC5764727          DOI: 10.14745/ccdr.v43i09a02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep        ISSN: 1188-4169


  7 in total

1.  Rating the strength of scientific evidence: relevance for quality improvement programs.

Authors:  Kathleen N Lohr
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.038

Review 2.  A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: Alternative tool structure is proposed.

Authors:  Michael Crowe; Lorraine Sheppard
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Quality and strength of evidence of the Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Abdur Rahman Khan; Sobia Khan; Valerie Zimmerman; Larry M Baddour; Imad M Tleyjeh
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 4.  How to critically appraise an article.

Authors:  Jane M Young; Michael J Solomon
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-01-20

5.  Critical appraisal through a new lens.

Authors:  L Kathleen Stevens; E Darlene Ricketts; Jill E E Bruneau
Journal:  Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont)       Date:  2014-06

Review 6.  A systematic review of HIV testing among Canadian populations.

Authors:  Shalane Ha; Dana Paquette; Jill Tarasuk; Jeff Dodds; Margaret Gale-Rowe; James I Brooks; John Kim; Tom Wong
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2014-01-15

Review 7.  A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools.

Authors:  Persis Katrak; Andrea E Bialocerkowski; Nicola Massy-Westropp; Saravana Kumar; Karen A Grimmer
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 4.615

  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  The National Advisory Committee on Infection Prevention and Control (NAC-IPC).

Authors:  T Ogunremi; K Dunn; L Johnston; J Embree
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2018-11-01

2.  Leveling the field: Development of reliable scoring rubrics for quantitative and qualitative medical education research abstracts.

Authors:  Jaime Jordan; Laura R Hopson; Caroline Molins; Suzanne K Bentley; Nicole M Deiorio; Sally A Santen; Lalena M Yarris; Wendy C Coates; Michael A Gisondi
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2021-08-01

3.  Evidence for optimal HIV screening and testing intervals in HIV-negative individuals from various risk groups: A systematic review.

Authors:  K Timmerman; M Weekes; G Traversy; P Prabakhar; T Austin; S Ha; B Anwar
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2018-12-06

4.  Infection prevention in personal services settings: Evidence, gaps and the way forward.

Authors:  A Popalyar; J Stafford; T Ogunremi; K Dunn
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2019-01-03

Review 5.  Effectiveness and Safety of Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Persons Exposed to Cases of Invasive Group A Streptococcal Disease: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Faizan Khan; Zemin Bai; Shannon Kelly; Becky Skidmore; Catherine Dickson; Alexandra Nunn; Katie Rutledge-Taylor; George Wells
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.423

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.