Literature DB >> 19151595

Sex differences in auditory processing in peripersonal space: an event-related potential study.

Stephanie Lynn Simon-Dack1, Chris Kelland Friesen, Wolfgang Alexander Teder-Sälejärvi.   

Abstract

Further processing of auditory stimuli in the free field is attenuated when participants are in contact with speakers versus not touching them. Studies in the visual domain have found that men and women use different strategies for processing spatial information. In this study, we examined sex-related differences in event-related potentials while men and women performed an auditory discrimination task in peripersonal space when either holding speakers or resting their hands in their laps. We found that men responded more accurately than women to targets in attended locations, and that the sexes exhibited different event-related potential patterns during task performance. These differences are consistent with existing predictions of female top-down and male bottom-up strategies in spatial processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19151595      PMCID: PMC3144488          DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32831befc1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  23 in total

1.  Spatial attention to central and peripheral auditory stimuli as indexed by event-related potentials.

Authors:  W A Teder-Sälejärvi; S A Hillyard; B Röder; H J Neville
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1999-10-25

2.  Gender-specific hemispheric asymmetry in auditory space perception.

Authors:  Jörg Lewald
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-03

3.  Sex differences and the impact of steroid hormones on the developing human brain.

Authors:  Susanne Neufang; Karsten Specht; Markus Hausmann; Onur Güntürkün; Beate Herpertz-Dahlmann; Gereon R Fink; Kerstin Konrad
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Women and men exhibit different cortical activation patterns during mental rotation tasks.

Authors:  Kirsten Jordan; Torsten Wüstenberg; Hans Jochen Heinze; Michael Peters; Lutz Jäncke
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure.

Authors:  R Näätänen; T Picton
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Interstimulus interval and the selective-attention effect on auditory ERPs: "N1 enhancement" versus processing negativity.

Authors:  W Teder; K Alho; K Reinikainen; R Näätänen
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Event-related potentials demonstrate a narrow focus of auditory spatial attention.

Authors:  W Teder; R Näätänen
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1994-02-24       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Gender differences in event-related potentials during visual-spatial attention.

Authors:  E Vaquero; M J Cardoso; M Vázquez; C M Gómez
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.292

9.  Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial rotation in a virtual environment.

Authors:  Thomas D Parsons; Peter Larson; Kris Kratz; Marcus Thiebaux; Brendon Bluestein; J Galen Buckwalter; Albert A Rizzo
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 10.  The P300 wave of the human event-related potential.

Authors:  T W Picton
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.177

View more
  1 in total

1.  Men and women exhibit a differential bias for processing movement versus objects.

Authors:  Robert F McGivern; Brian Adams; Robert J Handa; Jaime A Pineda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.