Literature DB >> 8416064

Interstimulus interval and the selective-attention effect on auditory ERPs: "N1 enhancement" versus processing negativity.

W Teder1, K Alho, K Reinikainen, R Näätänen.   

Abstract

The attention effect on the auditory event-related potential (ERP) in dichotic conditions was studied as a function of the interstimulus interval (ISI). Subjects attended to stimuli delivered to a designated ear and responded to infrequent pitch deviants in this input. The mean ISI was either 80, 160, 480, or 800 ms. Negative difference waves (Nds) were computed by subtracting ERPs to unattended standards from ERPs to the same stimuli when attended. The exogenous N1, as estimated from unattended standard ERPs, was larger contralaterally to the stimulus and inverted in polarity at mastoids. With decreasing ISIs, N1 diminished in amplitude much faster than did the Nd. In addition, N1 latency remained stable, whereas Nd peaked markedly earlier with shorter ISIs, almost perfectly coinciding with the exogenous N1. However, this temporal coincidence found in grand averages proved to be illusory in single subjects. The early Nd showed no contralateral asymmetry at its peak, but asymmetry was apparent during the ascending slope. These lateral asymmetries resembled those of the exogenous N1 but occurred later. The early Nd peak was, at least mainly, caused by an endogenous attention effect, the processing negativity (PN), even with very short ISIs, but an effect on the exogenous N1 could not be excluded.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8416064     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb03206.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  13 in total

1.  Modulation of auditory cortex activation by sound presentation rate and attention.

Authors:  Teemu Rinne; Johanna Pekkola; Alexander Degerman; Taina Autti; Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Mikko Sams; Kimmo Alho
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Signal clustering modulates auditory cortical activity in humans.

Authors:  C Alain; D L Woods
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-11

3.  The effects of attentional load on auditory ERPs recorded from human cortex.

Authors:  Michael F Neelon; Justin Williams; P Charles Garell
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Proprioceptive cues modulate further processing of spatially congruent auditory information. a high-density EEG study.

Authors:  S L Simon-Dack; W A Teder-Sälejärvi
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Sex differences in auditory processing in peripersonal space: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Stephanie Lynn Simon-Dack; Chris Kelland Friesen; Wolfgang Alexander Teder-Sälejärvi
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Hemispheric differences in auditory oddball responses during monaural versus binaural stimulation.

Authors:  Casey S Gilmore; Brett A Clementz; Patrick Berg
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 2.997

7.  The nature of hemispheric specialization for prosody perception.

Authors:  Jurriaan Witteman; Katharina S Goerlich-Dobre; Sander Martens; André Aleman; Vincent J Van Heuven; Niels O Schiller
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.526

8.  Electrophysiological correlates of selective attention: a lifespan comparison.

Authors:  Viktor Mueller; Yvonne Brehmer; Timo von Oertzen; Shu-Chen Li; Ulman Lindenberger
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  Self-initiation and temporal cueing of monaural tones reduce the auditory N1 and P2.

Authors:  Paul F Sowman; Anni Kuusik; Blake W Johnson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Sequential Processing and the Matching-Stimulus Interval Effect in ERP Components: An Exploration of the Mechanism Using Multiple Regression.

Authors:  Genevieve Z Steiner; Robert J Barry; Craig J Gonsalvez
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.