BACKGROUND: Previous studies in young and middle-aged men and women have shown that resting electrocardiographic (ECG) variables are influenced by genetic factors. However, the extent to which resting ECG variables are influenced by genetic factors in older women is unknown. Thus, the aim of this study was to estimate the relative contribution of genetic and environmental influences to individual differences in resting ECG variables among older female twins without overt cardiac diseases. METHODS: Resting ECG recordings were obtained from 186 monozygotic and 203 dizygotic twin individuals, aged 63-76 years. Quantitative genetic modeling was used to decompose the phenotypic variance in each resting ECG variable into additive genetic, dominance genetic, shared environmental, and unique environmental influences. RESULTS: The results showed that individual differences in the majority of the resting ECG variables were moderately to highly explained by additive genetic influences, ranging from 32% for T axis to 72% for TV(5). The results also suggested dominance genetic influences on QRS duration, TV(1), and Sokolow-Lyon voltage (36%, 53%, and 57%, respectively). Unique environmental influences were important for each resting ECG variable, whereas shared environmental influences were detected only for QT interval and QTc. CONCLUSION: In older women without overt cardiac diseases, genetic influences explain a moderate to high proportion of individual differences in the majority of the resting ECG variables. Genetic influences are especially strong for T-wave amplitudes, left ventricular mass, and hypertrophy indices, whereas other variables, including heart rate, intervals, and axes, are more affected by environmental influences.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies in young and middle-aged men and women have shown that resting electrocardiographic (ECG) variables are influenced by genetic factors. However, the extent to which resting ECG variables are influenced by genetic factors in older women is unknown. Thus, the aim of this study was to estimate the relative contribution of genetic and environmental influences to individual differences in resting ECG variables among older female twins without overt cardiac diseases. METHODS: Resting ECG recordings were obtained from 186 monozygotic and 203 dizygotic twin individuals, aged 63-76 years. Quantitative genetic modeling was used to decompose the phenotypic variance in each resting ECG variable into additive genetic, dominance genetic, shared environmental, and unique environmental influences. RESULTS: The results showed that individual differences in the majority of the resting ECG variables were moderately to highly explained by additive genetic influences, ranging from 32% for T axis to 72% for TV(5). The results also suggested dominance genetic influences on QRS duration, TV(1), and Sokolow-Lyon voltage (36%, 53%, and 57%, respectively). Unique environmental influences were important for each resting ECG variable, whereas shared environmental influences were detected only for QT interval and QTc. CONCLUSION: In older women without overt cardiac diseases, genetic influences explain a moderate to high proportion of individual differences in the majority of the resting ECG variables. Genetic influences are especially strong for T-wave amplitudes, left ventricular mass, and hypertrophy indices, whereas other variables, including heart rate, intervals, and axes, are more affected by environmental influences.
Authors: Jarna C Hannukainen; Urho M Kujala; Jyri Toikka; Olli J Heinonen; Jukka Kapanen; Tero Vahlberg; Jaakko Kaprio; Kari K Kalliokoski Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2005-04-07
Authors: Chrysoula Dalageorgou; Dongliang Ge; Yalda Jamshidi; Ilja M Nolte; Harriëtte Riese; Irina Savelieva; Nicholas D Carter; Tim D Spector; Harold Snieder Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2007-11-20
Authors: A Busjahn; H Knoblauch; H D Faulhaber; T Boeckel; M Rosenthal; R Uhlmann; M Hoehe; H Schuster; F C Luft Journal: Circulation Date: 1999-06-22 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: P N Casale; R B Devereux; P Kligfield; R R Eisenberg; D H Miller; B S Chaudhary; M C Phillips Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1985-09 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Satu Pajala; Pertti Era; Markku Koskenvuo; Jaakko Kaprio; Asko Tolvanen; Eino Heikkinen; Kristina Tiainen; Taina Rantanen Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2003-09-05
Authors: Karoline Schousboe; Gonneke Willemsen; Kirsten O Kyvik; Jakob Mortensen; Dorret I Boomsma; Belinda K Cornes; Chayna J Davis; Corrado Fagnani; Jacob Hjelmborg; Jaakko Kaprio; Marlies De Lange; Michelle Luciano; Nicholas G Martin; Nancy Pedersen; Kirsi H Pietiläinen; Aila Rissanen; Suoma Saarni; Thorkild I A Sørensen; G Caroline M Van Baal; Jennifer R Harris Journal: Twin Res Date: 2003-10
Authors: Sara Mutikainen; Merja Perhonen; Markku Alén; Tuija Leskinen; Jouko Karjalainen; Taina Rantanen; Jaakko Kaprio; Urho M Kujala Journal: J Sports Sci Med Date: 2009-12-01 Impact factor: 2.988
Authors: Sara Mutikainen; Alfredo Ortega-Alonso; Markku Alén; Jaakko Kaprio; Jouko Karjalainen; Taina Rantanen; Urho M Kujala Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: David E Arnolds; Alison Chu; Elizabeth M McNally; Marcelo A Nobrega; Ivan P Moskowitz Journal: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol Date: 2011-04-28
Authors: Bernhard M Kaess; Charlotte Andersson; Meredith S Duncan; Martin G Larson; Kristian Aasbjerg; Gunnar H Gislason; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2019-06-20
Authors: Per Ladenvall; Björn Andersson; Mikael Dellborg; Per-Olof Hansson; Henry Eriksson; Dag Thelle; Peter Eriksson Journal: Open Heart Date: 2015-04-10
Authors: Emily C Hodkinson; Melanie Neijts; Arash Sadrieh; Mohammad S Imtiaz; Mathias Baumert; Rajesh N Subbiah; Christopher S Hayward; Dorret Boomsma; Gonneke Willemsen; Jamie I Vandenberg; Adam P Hill; Eco De Geus Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2016-04-29 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Claudia Tamar Silva; Jan A Kors; Najaf Amin; Abbas Dehghan; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Rob Willemsen; Ben A Oostra; Cornelia M van Duijn; Aaron Isaacs Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2015-09-18 Impact factor: 5.881