Literature DB >> 10426641

Subsequent obstetric performance related to primary mode of delivery.

J Jolly1, J Walker, K Bhabra.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To relate subsequent obstetric performance with primary mode of delivery.
DESIGN: Postal questionnaire survey of women who delivered their first child five years ago.
SETTING: Huddersfield Royal Infirmary. POPULATION: Women who were delivered of their first baby in 1991: 250 by normal vaginal delivery; 250 by instrumental vaginal delivery; and 250 by caesarean section. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Answers to fixed choice questions on fear of future childbirth, number of subsequent children and reasons for no further children.
RESULTS: The response rate was 64%. Overall, 222 (46.6%) women were initially frightened about future childbirth. According to mode of delivery: 93 (57.1%) after instrumental vaginal; 79 (47.9%) after caesarean section; and 50 (33.8%) after normal vaginal delivery. Five years after the primary delivery, 99 women (20.8%) were still frightened about future childbirth: instrumental vaginal group 41 (25.2%); caesarean section group 43 (26.1%); and normal vaginal group 15 (10.1%). In the group of women who were delivered by caesarean section 13% more women had not had a second child after five years compared with the normal vaginal delivery group ((P < 0.03, relative risk 1.46 (1.07-1.99)). In the group of women who had a vaginal instrumental delivery 6% more had not had a second child after five years compared with normal vaginal delivery group. Of the women who had no further children, 30% who had caesarean section and 28% vaginal instrumental delivery had involuntary infertility.
CONCLUSIONS: Caesarean section or vaginal instrumental delivery leaves many mothers frightened about future childbirth. Primary caesarean section and to some extent vaginal instrumental delivery is associated with an increased risk of voluntary and involuntary infertility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10426641     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08235.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0306-5456


  19 in total

Review 1.  Postoperative adhesion development following cesarean and open intra-abdominal gynecological operations: a review.

Authors:  Awoniyi O Awonuga; Nicole M Fletcher; Ghassan M Saed; Michael P Diamond
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.060

2.  The impact of obstetric mode of delivery on childhood behavior.

Authors:  Sukainah Y Al Khalaf; Sinéad M O'Neill; Linda M O'Keeffe; Tine B Henriksen; Louise C Kenny; John F Cryan; Ali S Khashan
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 4.328

3.  Brief Report: Cesarean Delivery and Subsequent Fecundability.

Authors:  Rose G Radin; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Kenneth J Rothman; Elizabeth E Hatch; Henrik T Sorensen; Anders H Riis; Wendy Kuohung; Lauren A Wise
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  The effect of physicians' remuneration system on the Caesarean section rate: the Uruguayan case.

Authors:  Patricia Triunfo; Máximo Rossi
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2009-01-16

5.  Outcome of subsequent pregnancy three years after previous operative delivery in the second stage of labour: cohort study.

Authors:  Rachna Bahl; Bryony Strachan; Deirdre J Murphy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-14

6.  Mode of first delivery and women's intentions for subsequent childbearing: findings from the First Baby Study.

Authors:  Kristen H Kjerulff; Diana L Velott; Junjia Zhu; Cynthia H Chuang; Marianne M Hillemeier; Ian M Paul; John T Repke
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 3.980

7.  First birth Caesarean section and subsequent fertility: a population-based study in the USA, 2000-2008.

Authors:  K H Kjerulff; J Zhu; C S Weisman; C V Ananth
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  A prospective study of effects of psychological factors and sleep on obstetric interventions, mode of birth, and neonatal outcomes among low-risk British Columbian women.

Authors:  Wendy A Hall; Kathrin Stoll; Eileen K Hutton; Helen Brown
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Impact on caesarean section rates following injections of sterile water (ICARIS): a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Nigel Lee; Lena B Mårtensson; Caroline Homer; Joan Webster; Kristen Gibbons; Helen Stapleton; Natalie Dos Santos; Michael Beckmann; Yu Gao; Sue Kildea
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 10.  Caesarean delivery and subsequent stillbirth or miscarriage: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sinéad M O'Neill; Patricia M Kearney; Louise C Kenny; Ali S Khashan; Tine B Henriksen; Jennifer E Lutomski; Richard A Greene
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.