Literature DB >> 19148107

The Phase III, double-blind, parallel-group controlled study of amlodipine 10 mg once daily in Japanese patients with essential hypertension who insufficiently responded to amlodipine 5 mg once daily.

T Fujiwara1, Y Ii, J Hatsuzawa, H Murase, T Watanabe, M Murakami, N Kimura, J Buch, T Tsuchihashi, T Saruta.   

Abstract

The objective of this Phase III double-blind parallel-group controlled study was to examine the superiority of amlodipine 10 mg once daily (the amlodipine 10 mg group) to amlodipine 5 mg once daily (the amlodipine 5 mg group) in 305 Japanese outpatients with essential hypertension whose systolic blood pressure (SBP) had not reached the therapeutic target levels (<130-140/80-90 mm Hg) when treated with amlodipine 5 mg once daily. This study consisted of the 1-week prescreening, 8-week screening and 8-week double-blind periods. Changes in trough SBP from baseline at week 8 of the double-blind period (week 8) were -7.0 mm Hg and -13.7 mm Hg in the amlodipine 5 and 10 mg groups, respectively; a significant difference (P<0.001) was found between the two groups. Changes in trough diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from baseline at week 8 were -2.7 mm Hg and -6.8 mm Hg in the amlodipine 5 and 10 mg groups, respectively, with a significant difference (P<0.001) between the two groups. At week 8, responder rates were 28.5 and 44.0% in the amlodipine 5 mg and 10 mg groups, respectively, with a significant difference (P=0.002) between the two groups. The amlodipine 10 mg group showed no significant difference in the incidences of adverse events against the amlodipine 5 mg group. The incidence of mild peripheral oedema was 4% only in the amlodipine 10 mg group. In conclusion, amlodipine 10 mg once daily was found to be superior to amlodipine 5 mg once daily, safe, well tolerated and useful for the relevant subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19148107     DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2008.161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  4 in total

1.  The effects of increasing calcium channel blocker dose vs. adding a diuretic to treatment regimens for patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

Authors:  Shigemasa Tani; Kei Asayama; Koji Oiwa; Shinsuke Harasawa; Katsuaki Okubo; Atsuhiko Takahashi; Ayumi Tanabe; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Atsushi Hirayama; Toshio Kushiro
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.872

2.  Efficacy and safety of the dual L- and T-type calcium channel blocker, ACT-280778: a proof-of-concept study in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.

Authors:  J Dingemanse; P Otasevic; K Shakeri-Nejad; E Klainman; B Putnikovic; H Kracker; M S Mueller; R Zimlichman
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.012

3.  Incremental Blood Pressure-Lowering Effect of Titrating Amlodipine for the Treatment of Hypertension in Patients Including Those Aged ≥55 Years.

Authors:  Barrett W Jeffers; Rahul Bhambri; Jeffery Robbins
Journal:  Am J Ther       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.688

4.  Uptitrating amlodipine significantly reduces blood pressure in diabetic patients with hypertension: a retrospective, pooled analysis.

Authors:  Barrett W Jeffers; Rahul Bhambri; Jeffery Robbins
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2014-11-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.