Literature DB >> 25231512

Efficacy and safety of the dual L- and T-type calcium channel blocker, ACT-280778: a proof-of-concept study in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.

J Dingemanse1, P Otasevic2, K Shakeri-Nejad1, E Klainman3, B Putnikovic4, H Kracker5, M S Mueller1, R Zimlichman6.   

Abstract

ACT-280778 is an oral, non-dihydropyridine, dual L-/T-type calcium channel blocker. This phase 2a, double-blind, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled study investigated the efficacy and safety of 10 mg ACT-280778. Patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension received once-daily placebo (n=53), ACT-280778 10 mg (n=52) or amlodipine 10 mg (n=54) for 4 weeks. The primary end point was the change from baseline to week 4 in placebo-adjusted mean trough sitting diastolic blood pressure (SiDBP) with ACT-280778. Tolerability was assessed by recording treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Baseline clinical characteristics were similar across groups. No significant difference was observed at week 4 in mean trough SiDBP between placebo (-9.9 (95% confidence limit (CL) -12.7, -7.0) mm Hg) and ACT-280778 (-9.5 (-12.4, -6.5) mm Hg; P=0.86); amlodipine reduced mean trough SiDBP by -16.8 (-19.0, -14.5) mm Hg, confirming assay validity. Change in mean PR interval at week 4 (pre-dose) differed between placebo (-1.0 (95% CL -4.4, 2.3) ms) and ACT-280778 (6.5 (3.5, 9.6) ms); amlodipine did not increase PR interval (1.1 (-1.6, 3.9) ms).Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) frequency was 32.1% (placebo), 32.7% (ACT-280778) and 33.3% (amlodipine). The most common TEAEs were headache, peripheral edema, hypertension and second-degree atrioventricular block. ACT-280778 (10 mg) did not lower blood pressure in mild-to-moderate hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25231512     DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2014.79

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  23 in total

1.  The Phase III, double-blind, parallel-group controlled study of amlodipine 10 mg once daily in Japanese patients with essential hypertension who insufficiently responded to amlodipine 5 mg once daily.

Authors:  T Fujiwara; Y Ii; J Hatsuzawa; H Murase; T Watanabe; M Murakami; N Kimura; J Buch; T Tsuchihashi; T Saruta
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 3.012

2.  Tolerability and pharmacokinetics of ACT-280778, a novel nondihydropyridine dual L/T-type calcium channel blocker: early clinical studies in healthy male subjects using adaptive designs.

Authors:  Markus S Mueller; Kasra Shakeri-Nejad; Marcelo M Gutierrez; Andreas Krause; Jörg Täubel; Brian Sanderson; Jasper Dingemanse
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.105

Review 3.  Cardiac effects of calcium antagonists in systemic hypertension.

Authors:  L Michalewicz; F H Messerli
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1997-05-22       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Comparative antihypertensive effectiveness of once-daily mibefradil and diltiazem CD. Mibefradil Hypertension Study Group.

Authors:  N Bittar
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.393

Review 5.  Amlodipine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  D Murdoch; R C Heel
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Comparative efficacy and tolerability of two long-acting calcium antagonists, mibefradil and amlodipine, in essential hypertension. Mibefradil Hypertension Study Group.

Authors:  F E Karch; R Pordy; J R Benz; A Carr; N M Lunde; T Marbury; J N Tarro
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.393

7.  Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 10.190

8.  Beneficial Effect of Efonidipine, an L- and T-Type Dual Calcium Channel Blocker, on Heart Rate and Blood Pressure in Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Essential Hypertension.

Authors:  Il-Young Oh; Myung-Ki Seo; Hae-Young Lee; Soon Gil Kim; Ki-Sik Kim; Won-Ho Kim; Min Soo Hyon; Kyoo-Rok Han; Se-Joong Lim; Cheol-Ho Kim
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 3.243

9.  Tolerability of long-term treatment with lercanidipine versus amlodipine and lacidipine in elderly hypertensives.

Authors:  Gastone Leonetti; Bruno Magnani; Achille Cesare Pessina; Alessandro Rappelli; Bruno Trimarco; Alberto Zanchetti
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 10.  Prompt, aggressive BP lowering in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Kenneth A Jamerson; Jan Basile
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  3 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of Tylerdipine Hydrochloride, a Novel Dihydropyridine Dual L/T-type Calcium Channel Blocker, after Single and Multiple Oral Doses in Healthy Chinese Subjects.

Authors:  Sufeng Zhou; Yuanyuan Wang; Lu Wang; Lijun Xie; Juan Chen; Yun Liu; Hongwen Zhang; Yuqing Zhao; Ning Ou; Feng Shao
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.859

2.  Blood pressure lowering effect of calcium channel blockers on perioperative hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu Lin; Lina Ma
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Comparative peripheral edema for dihydropyridines calcium channel blockers treatment: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ling Liang; Janice Y Kung; Bradley Mitchelmore; Andrew Cave; Hoan Linh Banh
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.885

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.