Literature DB >> 28446804

The effects of increasing calcium channel blocker dose vs. adding a diuretic to treatment regimens for patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

Shigemasa Tani1,2, Kei Asayama3,4, Koji Oiwa5, Shinsuke Harasawa1,2, Katsuaki Okubo1,2, Atsuhiko Takahashi1,2, Ayumi Tanabe6, Takayoshi Ohkubo3, Atsushi Hirayama2, Toshio Kushiro7.   

Abstract

In patients with insufficient blood pressure (BP) control, despite using a combination regimen containing an angiotensin receptor blocker and a calcium channel blocker (CCB), whether a greater dose of CCB or adding a diuretic is more effective at lowering BP remains unclear. We conducted a multicenter randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of switching from the daily administration of a single-pill fixed-dose combination of irbesartan (100 mg) and amlodipine (5 mg) to irbesartan (100 mg) with an increased dose of amlodipine (10 mg) (HD group, n=62) or irbesartan (100 mg) and amlodipine (5 mg) with 1 mg of indapamide (D group, n=63) in patients with poorly controlled hypertension. BP measured at home was monitored by a physician using a telemonitoring system. Between the HD and D groups, no significant differences were observed in morning home BP changes (mean reduction of systolic/diastolic BP, 1.7/0.9 mmHg; 95% confidence intervals, -2.4 to 5.7/-1.4 to 3.2; P=0.19/0.37), achievement rate of target BP (45.2% vs. 42.9%, P=0.80), BP variability independent of the mean (P⩾0.74), other variability indices (P⩾0.55) and time to stabilization, which was calculated using a fitted analysis (13.1 days vs. 11.4 days, P=0.99). Although a significant increase in serum uric acid was observed in the D group (P<0.0001), neither clinically relevant abnormal laboratory test results nor critical BP changes were observed throughout the trial period. Both antihypertensive drug combination strategies were effective treatment options. Further investigation is required to determine the appropriate use of both therapies based on the various pathologies associated with hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28446804     DOI: 10.1038/hr.2017.56

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertens Res        ISSN: 0916-9636            Impact factor:   3.872


  45 in total

1.  The velocity of antihypertensive effect of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide and angiotensin II receptor blocker.

Authors:  Hirohito Metoki; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Masahiro Kikuya; Kei Asayama; Ryusuke Inoue; Taku Obara; Takuo Hirose; Michihiro Sato; Takanao Hashimoto; Yutaka Imai
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.844

2.  Validation of two automatic devices: Omron HEM-7252G-HP and Omron HEM-7251G for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010.

Authors:  Hakuo Takahashi; Masamichi Yoshika; Toyohiko Yokoi
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.444

3.  World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki. Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-03-19       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Prognosis in relation to blood pressure variability: pro side of the argument.

Authors:  Kazuomi Kario
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  Prognostic value of reading-to-reading blood pressure variability over 24 hours in 8938 subjects from 11 populations.

Authors:  Tine W Hansen; Lutgarde Thijs; Yan Li; José Boggia; Masahiro Kikuya; Kristina Björklund-Bodegård; Tom Richart; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Jørgen Jeppesen; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Eamon Dolan; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Katarzyna Stolarz-Skrzypek; Valérie Tikhonoff; Sofia Malyutina; Edoardo Casiglia; Yuri Nikitin; Lars Lind; Edgardo Sandoya; Kalina Kawecka-Jaszcz; Yutaka Imai; Jiguang Wang; Hans Ibsen; Eoin O'Brien; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 6.  Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dena Ettehad; Connor A Emdin; Amit Kiran; Simon G Anderson; Thomas Callender; Jonathan Emberson; John Chalmers; Anthony Rodgers; Kazem Rahimi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Cardiovascular outcomes in the first trial of antihypertensive therapy guided by self-measured home blood pressure.

Authors:  Kei Asayama; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Hirohito Metoki; Taku Obara; Ryusuke Inoue; Masahiro Kikuya; Lutgarde Thijs; Jan A Staessen; Yutaka Imai
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 3.872

8.  Effects of a low dose of indapamide, a diuretic, given daily or every-other-day on blood pressure and metabolic parameters.

Authors:  Munemichi Inaba; Yuichi Noguchi; Taro Yamamoto; Tomihiko Imai; Masako Hatano; Shinji Yagi; Shigehiro Katayama
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.872

9.  Home blood pressure variability as cardiovascular risk factor in the population of Ohasama.

Authors:  Kei Asayama; Masahiro Kikuya; Rudolph Schutte; Lutgarde Thijs; Miki Hosaka; Michihiro Satoh; Azusa Hara; Taku Obara; Ryusuke Inoue; Hirohito Metoki; Takuo Hirose; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Jan A Staessen; Yutaka Imai
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan.

Authors:  Seiichi Matsuo; Enyu Imai; Masaru Horio; Yoshinari Yasuda; Kimio Tomita; Kosaku Nitta; Kunihiro Yamagata; Yasuhiko Tomino; Hitoshi Yokoyama; Akira Hishida
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 8.860

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Thiazide Diuretic-Induced Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose: a Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Jill J Hall; Dean T Eurich; Danielle Nagy; Lisa Tjosvold; John-Michael Gamble
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Assessment of suitable antihypertensive therapies: Combination with high-dose amlodipine/irbesartan vs triple combination with amlodipine/irbesartan/indapamide (ASAHI-AI study).

Authors:  Naoki Nakagawa; Nobuyuki Sato; Yasuaki Saijo; Hideo Morimoto; Satoshi Koyama; Yuji Ogawa; Kazumi Uekita; Junichi Maruyama; Takafumi Ohta; Yasuhiro Nakamura; Toshiharu Takeuchi; Naoyuki Hasebe
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Treatment patterns and adherence to antihypertensive combination therapies in Japan using a claims database.

Authors:  Takayuki Ishida; Akinori Oh; Shinzo Hiroi; Yukio Shimasaki; Nobuhiro Nishigaki; Takuya Tsuchihashi
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.872

4.  Association Between Amplitude of Seasonal Variation in Self-Measured Home Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Outcomes: HOMED-BP (Hypertension Objective Treatment Based on Measurement By Electrical Devices of Blood Pressure) Study.

Authors:  Tomohiro Hanazawa; Kei Asayama; Daisuke Watabe; Ayumi Tanabe; Michihiro Satoh; Ryusuke Inoue; Azusa Hara; Taku Obara; Masahiro Kikuya; Kyoko Nomura; Hirohito Metoki; Yutaka Imai; Takayoshi Ohkubo
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 5.501

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.