Literature DB >> 1914739

Delayed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Complications and functional results.

S Galandiuk1, J H Pemberton, J Tsao, D M Ilstrup, B G Wolff.   

Abstract

In patients with chronic ulcerative colitis (CUC), ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) can be performed either at the time of colectomy or as a delayed procedure after total abdominal colectomy and ileostomy. There has been debate as to whether delayed IPAA results in superior functional results, since patients are frequently steroid-free and have little evidence of active disease. To assess this, we analyzed 95 patients who had undergone total abdominal colectomy, either with ileostomy and Hartmann's procedure or with ileorectostomy, 2-183 months prior to IPAA. Postoperative complications and functional results were compared with those of 776 CUC patients who underwent IPAA at the time of abdominal colectomy. Indications for prior colectomy included toxic megacolon (40 percent), failed medical therapy (36 percent), other reasons (e.g., iatrogenic perforation, cancer) (6 percent), and reasons unclear (18 percent). Nineteen percent of delayed-IPAA patients were taking steroids at the time of pouch construction. Follow-ups were similar in the two groups. The incidence of septic and obstructive complications after delayed IPAA vs. IPAA at the time of colectomy were 10.5 percent vs. 5.4 percent and 6.5 percent vs. 14.5 percent, respectively. There were no significant differences in postoperative functional results between the two groups. Delayed IPAA confers no advantage over IPAA performed at the time of colectomy in terms of functional outcome. Delayed IPAA was associated with a significantly higher rate of septic complications but a lower incidence of postoperative obstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1914739     DOI: 10.1007/bf02051065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  9 in total

Review 1.  The incidence and risk factors of post-laparotomy adhesive small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  Galinos Barmparas; Bernardino C Branco; Beat Schnüriger; Lydia Lam; Kenji Inaba; Demetrios Demetriades
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Adhesions are common and costly after open pouch surgery.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Sileri; Roberto Sthory; Enda McVeigh; Tim Child; Chris Cunningham; Neil J Mortensen; Ian Lindsey
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Risk of small bowel obstruction after the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  Anthony R MacLean; Zane Cohen; Helen M MacRae; Brenda I O'Connor; Davin Mukraj; Erin D Kennedy; Robert Parkes; Robin S McLeod
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  [Proctocolectomy in ulcerative colitis : is a multistep procedure in cases of immunosuppression advisable?].

Authors:  C Seifarth; J Gröne; N Slavova; B Siegmund; H J Buhr; J-P Ritz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Restorative proctocolectomy: the current ochsner experience.

Authors:  Shahrazad Talebinejad; Terry C Hicks; David A Margolin; Charles B Whitlow; H David Vargas; David E Beck
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2013

Review 6.  State-of-the-art surgical approaches to the treatment of medically refractory ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Liliana Bordeianou; Lillias Maguire
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Comparable perioperative outcomes, long-term outcomes, and quality of life in a retrospective analysis of ulcerative colitis patients following 2-stage versus 3-stage proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  Grace C Lee; Sarah E Deery; Hiroko Kunitake; Caitlin W Hicks; Adriana G Olariu; Lieba R Savitt; Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Rocco Ricciardi; Richard A Hodin; Liliana G Bordeianou
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Body image, cosmesis, quality of life, and functional outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy: long-term results of a randomized trial.

Authors:  S W Polle; M S Dunker; J F M Slors; M A Sprangers; M A Cuesta; D J Gouma; W A Bemelman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  An audit of restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  M R Keighley; S Grobler; I Bain
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 23.059

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.