Literature DB >> 19146350

Comparison of contrast-response functions from multifocal visual-evoked potentials (mfVEPs) and functional MRI responses.

Jason C Park1, Xian Zhang, John Ferrera, Joy Hirsch, Donald C Hood.   

Abstract

Contrast response functions (CRFs) from multifocal visual-evoked potential (mfVEP) and BOLD fMRI responses were obtained using the same stimuli to test the hypothesis of a linear relationship between the mfVEP and BOLD fMRI responses. Monocular mfVEP and BOLD fMRI responses were obtained using an 8 degrees in diameter, dartboard pattern stimulus with reversing checkerboards. Six contrast conditions (4%, 8%, 16%, 32%, 64%, and 90%) were run. The mfVEP, largely generated in V1, was compared to the BOLD fMRI signal from V1 and extrastriate cortex. Retinotopic maps of each subject were acquired and used to localize the V1 area. For all subjects, the CRFs for the mfVEPs and BOLD fMRI responses showed good agreement, suggesting that they both share the same functional relationship with underlying neural activity. In particular, this result is consistent with the assumption that the relationship between the BOLD response and underlying neural activity is linear, although the particular linear model proposed by D. J. Heeger, A. C. Huk, W. S. Geisler, and D. G. Albrecht (2000) does not fit the results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19146350      PMCID: PMC2987574          DOI: 10.1167/8.10.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  47 in total

1.  Processing deficits in primary visual cortex of amblyopic cats.

Authors:  Kerstin E Schmidt; Wolf Singer; Ralf A W Galuske
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Subcortical contributions to the surface-recorded flash-VEP in the awake macaque.

Authors:  C E Schroeder; C E Tenke; S J Givre
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992 May-Jun

3.  A comparison of hemodynamic and neural responses in cat visual cortex using complex stimuli.

Authors:  Christoph Kayser; Mina Kim; Kamil Ugurbil; Dae-Shik Kim; Peter König
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-04-14       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  A principal component analysis of multifocal pattern reversal VEP.

Authors:  Xian Zhang; Donald C Hood
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  Interpreting the BOLD signal.

Authors:  Nikos K Logothetis; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 19.318

6.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation.

Authors:  S Ogawa; T M Lee; A R Kay; D W Tank
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Coding of image contrast in central visual pathways of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  G Sclar; J H Maunsell; P Lennie
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  The topography and variability of the primary visual cortex in man.

Authors:  S S Stensaas; D K Eddington; W H Dobelle
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Striate cortex of monkey and cat: contrast response function.

Authors:  D G Albrecht; D B Hamilton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  S-potentials from colour units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae).

Authors:  K I Naka; W A Rushton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  6 in total

1.  Dynamic changes in superior temporal sulcus connectivity during perception of noisy audiovisual speech.

Authors:  Audrey R Nath; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Inter-ocular contrast normalization in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Farshad Moradi; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The effect of eccentricity on the contrast response function of multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEPs).

Authors:  Michal Laron; Han Cheng; Bin Zhang; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Comparison of the reliability of multifocal visual evoked cortical potentials generated by pattern reversal and pattern pulse stimulation.

Authors:  G S Souza; H B Schakelford; A L A Moura; B D Gomes; D F Ventura; M E C Fitzgerald; L C L Silveira
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 2.590

5.  Resting state BOLD functional connectivity at 3T: spin echo versus gradient echo EPI.

Authors:  Piero Chiacchiaretta; Antonio Ferretti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Using an achiasmic human visual system to quantify the relationship between the fMRI BOLD signal and neural response.

Authors:  Pinglei Bao; Christopher J Purington; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 8.140

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.