Literature DB >> 19341759

The effect of eccentricity on the contrast response function of multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEPs).

Michal Laron1, Han Cheng, Bin Zhang, Laura J Frishman.   

Abstract

mfVEPs were recorded with a 22 degrees radius, 60 sector pattern reversal dartboard stimulus (VERIS) at six contrast levels (10%, 25%, 35%, 50%, 75%, 95%). Contrast response functions (CRFs) based on response amplitudes were adequately described by a simple hyperbolic function. The effect of reducing contrast on the amplitude was most apparent in the central 1 degrees radius, which had a C(50) (contrast at 50% of the maximum response) in excess of 50%, compared to values for C(50) in more eccentric regions that were 30% or lower. Mean latency increased 6 (+/-0.7 SE) ms from the highest to the lowest contrast tested, and did not vary significantly with eccentricity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19341759      PMCID: PMC2925020          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  32 in total

1.  Comparison of objective diagnostic tests in glaucoma: Heidelberg retinal tomography and multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  C Balachandran; S L Graham; A Klistorner; I Goldberg
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Determining abnormal latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials: a monocular analysis.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Nitin Ohri; E Bo Yang; Christopher Rodarte; Xian Zhang; Brad Fortune; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Contrast response of temporally sparse dichoptic multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Ted Maddess; Andrew Charles James; Elizabeth Anne Bowman
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.241

4.  Separate magnocellular and parvocellular contributions from temporal analysis of the multifocal VEP.

Authors:  A Klistorner; D P Crewther; S G Crewther
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  M and P components of the VEP and their visual field distribution.

Authors:  H A Baseler; E E Sutter
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The mosaic of midget ganglion cells in the human retina.

Authors:  D M Dacey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Striate cortex of monkey and cat: contrast response function.

Authors:  D G Albrecht; D B Hamilton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Visual cortex neurons in monkeys and cats: detection, discrimination, and identification.

Authors:  W S Geisler; D G Albrecht
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.241

9.  Normative ranges and specificity of the multifocal VEP.

Authors:  Brad Fortune; Xian Zhang; Donald C Hood; Shaban Demirel; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Dendritic field size and morphology of midget and parasol ganglion cells of the human retina.

Authors:  D M Dacey; M R Petersen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  3 in total

1.  Identification of clusters in multifocal electrophysiology recordings to maximize discriminant capacity (patients vs. control subjects).

Authors:  M Ortiz Del Castillo; B Cordón; E M Sánchez Morla; E Vilades; M J Rodrigo; C Cavaliere; L Boquete; E Garcia-Martin
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Comparison of the reliability of multifocal visual evoked cortical potentials generated by pattern reversal and pattern pulse stimulation.

Authors:  G S Souza; H B Schakelford; A L A Moura; B D Gomes; D F Ventura; M E C Fitzgerald; L C L Silveira
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 2.590

3.  Visual evoked cortical potential (VECP) elicited by sinusoidal gratings controlled by pseudo-random stimulation.

Authors:  Carolina S Araújo; Givago S Souza; Bruno D Gomes; Luiz Carlos L Silveira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.