Literature DB >> 15084493

A comparison of hemodynamic and neural responses in cat visual cortex using complex stimuli.

Christoph Kayser1, Mina Kim, Kamil Ugurbil, Dae-Shik Kim, Peter König.   

Abstract

We compare fMRI-BOLD responses in anesthetized cats with local field potentials (LFPs), aggregate high-frequency responses (analog-Mua) and spiking activity recorded in primary and higher visual cortex of alert animals. The similarity of the activations in these electrophysiological signals to those in the BOLD is quantified by counting recording sites where different stimuli elicit the same relative activation as in the imaging experiments. Using artificial stimuli, a comparison of BOLD and LFP strongly depends on the frequency range used. Stimulating with complex or natural stimuli reduces this frequency dependence and yields a good match of LFP and BOLD. In general, this match is best between 20 and 50 Hz. The measures of high-frequency activity behave qualitatively different: the responses of the analog-Mua match those of the LFP; the spiking activity shows a low concordance with the BOLD signal. This dissociation of BOLD and spiking activity is most prominent upon stimulation with natural stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15084493     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhh047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  42 in total

1.  The amplitude and timing of the BOLD signal reflects the relationship between local field potential power at different frequencies.

Authors:  Cesare Magri; Ulrich Schridde; Yusuke Murayama; Stefano Panzeri; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Mesoscopic Neural Representations in Spatial Navigation.

Authors:  Lukas Kunz; Shachar Maidenbaum; Dong Chen; Liang Wang; Joshua Jacobs; Nikolai Axmacher
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Cortical dynamics of word recognition.

Authors:  Nelly Mainy; Julien Jung; Monica Baciu; Philippe Kahane; Benjamin Schoendorff; Lorella Minotti; Dominique Hoffmann; Olivier Bertrand; Jean-Philippe Lachaux
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  BOLD fMRI and somatosensory evoked potentials are well correlated over a broad range of frequency content of somatosensory stimulation of the rat forepaw.

Authors:  Artem G Goloshevsky; Afonso C Silva; Stephen J Dodd; Alan P Koretsky
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  High-resolution fMRI maps of cortical activation in nonhuman primates: correlation with intrinsic signal optical images.

Authors:  Anna W Roe; Li M Chen
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2008

6.  Independent components in stimulus-related BOLD signals and estimation of the underlying neural responses.

Authors:  C W Tyler; L L Kontsevich; T C Ferree
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Relationship between task-related gamma oscillations and BOLD signal: new insights from combined fMRI and intracranial EEG.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Lachaux; Pierre Fonlupt; Philippe Kahane; Lorella Minotti; Dominique Hoffmann; Olivier Bertrand; Monica Baciu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Low-frequency local field potentials and spikes in primary visual cortex convey independent visual information.

Authors:  Andrei Belitski; Arthur Gretton; Cesare Magri; Yusuke Murayama; Marcelo A Montemurro; Nikos K Logothetis; Stefano Panzeri
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Comparison of contrast-response functions from multifocal visual-evoked potentials (mfVEPs) and functional MRI responses.

Authors:  Jason C Park; Xian Zhang; John Ferrera; Joy Hirsch; Donald C Hood
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  A rate code for sound azimuth in monkey auditory cortex: implications for human neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Uri Werner-Reiss; Jennifer M Groh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.