Literature DB >> 19146303

Dynamic, object-based remapping of visual features in trans-saccadic perception.

David Melcher1.   

Abstract

Saccadic eye movements can dramatically change the location in which an object is projected onto the retina. One mechanism that might potentially underlie the perception of stable objects, despite the occurrence of saccades, is the "remapping" of receptive fields around the time of saccadic eye movements. Here we examined two possible models of trans-saccadic remapping of visual features: (1) spatiotopic coordinates that remain constant across saccades or (2) an object-based remapping in retinal coordinates. We used form adaptation to test "object" and "space" based predictions for an adapter that changed spatial and/or retinal location due to eye movements, object motion or manual displacement using a computer mouse. The predictability and speed of the object motion was also manipulated. The main finding was that maximum transfer of the form aftereffect in retinal coordinates occurred when there was a saccade and when the object motion was attended and predictable. A small transfer was also found when observers moved the object across the screen using a computer mouse. The overall pattern of results is consistent with the theory of object-based remapping for salient stimuli. Thus, the active updating of the location and features of attended objects may play a role in perceptual stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19146303     DOI: 10.1167/8.14.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  20 in total

1.  Perceptual learning beyond retinotopic reference frame.

Authors:  En Zhang; Wu Li
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Predictive adjustment of the perceived direction of gaze during saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Masataka Suzuki; Yoshihiko Yamazaki
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 5.082

3.  The background is remapped across saccades.

Authors:  Oakyoon Cha; Sang Chul Chong
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Shape selectivity and remapping in dorsal stream visual area LIP.

Authors:  Janani Subramanian; Carol L Colby
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Binocular fusion and invariant category learning due to predictive remapping during scanning of a depthful scene with eye movements.

Authors:  Stephen Grossberg; Karthik Srinivasan; Arash Yazdanbakhsh
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-14

6.  Neural dynamics of object-based multifocal visual spatial attention and priming: object cueing, useful-field-of-view, and crowding.

Authors:  Nicholas C Foley; Stephen Grossberg; Ennio Mingolla
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Remapping attention in multiple object tracking.

Authors:  Piers D L Howe; Trafton Drew; Yair Pinto; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Feature integration across space, time, and orientation.

Authors:  Thomas U Otto; Haluk Ogmen; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Eye movements reset visual perception.

Authors:  Michael A Paradiso; Dar Meshi; Jordan Pisarcik; Samuel Levine
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  A (fascinating) litmus test for human retino- vs. non-retinotopic processing.

Authors:  Marco Boi; Haluk Oğmen; Joseph Krummenacher; Thomas U Otto; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.