Literature DB >> 19146286

Interpreting ambiguous visual information in motor learning.

Jennifer K Dionne1, Denise Y P Henriques.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that learning to reach accurately with an imposed visuomotor rotation requires a remapping of the relationship between vision and motor output. In this preliminary study, we examine how the brain works out the appropriate motor adjustments, in this case for both arms, based on visual images. Specifically, we investigate how visual errors seen while adapting reaches to visual targets affect the movements of both the trained and untrained hand. In our task subjects learned to make accurate reaches to targets in four visual feedback conditions: rotated 45 degrees, rotated 105 degrees, reversed left to right and rotated 45 degrees plus reversed. In all conditions the rotation was applied to the subject's feedback of their hand and not the targets. In the reversed and rotated-reversed condition, when the subject used their right hand, the feedback looked like their left hand (and vice versa). After a training period with one hand (e.g., right) subjects were tested with the opposite hand (e.g., left) on the same task. We predicted that after reaching with the right hand with reversed visual feedback the control of the left arm would also be altered-more so than after learning an equal-sized adjustment to right-arm reaching with a rotated, but non-reversed, view of their hand movements. Our results showed that people were able to learn the visuomotor adaptation with reversed visual feedback, but more interestingly, that learning occurred for the untrained hand as well for the reversed conditions alone. Here, vision alone--when it resembles the image of the opposite hand--led to improved initial performance for this opposite, untrained arm when reaching in a similar task. The brain seems to take advantage of reversed visual feedback of the arm to adjust the motor commands to the untrained arm in a way that facilitates transfer of the adaptation from one arm to the other.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19146286     DOI: 10.1167/8.15.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  11 in total

1.  The nervous system uses nonspecific motor learning in response to random perturbations of varying nature.

Authors:  Kunlin Wei; Daniel Wert; Konrad Körding
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Visuomotor adaptation and intermanual transfer under different viewing conditions.

Authors:  Amaris K Balitsky Thompson; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Impaired visuomotor generalization by inconsistent attentional contexts.

Authors:  Tony S L Wang; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Visuomotor adaptation and generalization with repeated and varied training.

Authors:  Jason L Neva; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Intermanual transfer and proprioceptive recalibration following training with translated visual feedback of the hand.

Authors:  Ahmed A Mostafa; Danielle Salomonczyk; Erin K Cressman; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Concurrent adaptation to opposing visuomotor rotations by varying hand and body postures.

Authors:  Maria N Ayala; Bernard Marius 't Hart; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Dual adaptation to opposing visuomotor rotations with similar hand movement trajectories.

Authors:  Ravindra Baldeo; Denise Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Context-dependent concurrent adaptation to static and moving targets.

Authors:  Maria N Ayala; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  An analytical method reduces noise bias in motor adaptation analysis.

Authors:  Daniel H Blustein; Ahmed W Shehata; Erin S Kuylenstierna; Kevin B Englehart; Jonathon W Sensinger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Differential contributions of implicit and explicit learning mechanisms to various contextual cues in dual adaptation.

Authors:  Maria N Ayala; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.