Literature DB >> 19145579

Use of activated graphitized carbon chips for liquid chromatography/mass spectrometric and tandem mass spectrometric analysis of tryptic glycopeptides.

William R Alley1, Yehia Mechref, Milos V Novotny.   

Abstract

Protein glycosylation has a significant medical importance as changes in glycosylation patterns have been associated with a number of diseases. Therefore, monitoring potential changes in glycan profiles, and the microheterogeneities associated with glycosylation sites, are becoming increasingly important in the search for disease biomarkers. Highly efficient separations and sensitive methods must be developed to effectively monitor changes in the glycoproteome. These methods must not discriminate against hydrophobic or hydrophilic analytes. The use of activated graphitized carbon as a desalting media and a stationary phase for the purification and the separation of glycans, and as a stationary phase for the separation of small glycopeptides, has previously been reported. Here, we describe the use of activated graphitized carbon as a stationary phase for the separation of hydrophilic tryptic glycopeptides, employing a chip-based liquid chromatographic (LC) system. The capabilities of both activated graphitized carbon and C(18) LC chips for the characterization of the glycopeptides appeared to be comparable. Adequate retention time reproducibility was achieved for both packing types in the chip format. However, hydrophilic glycopeptides were preferentially retained on the activated graphitized carbon chip, thus allowing the identification of hydrophilic glycopeptides which were not effectively retained on C(18) chips. On the other hand, hydrophobic glycopeptides were better retained on C(18) chips. Characterization of the glycosylation sites of glycoproteins possessing both hydrophilic and hydrophobic glycopeptides is comprehensively achieved using both media. This is feasible considering the limited amount of sample required per analysis (<1 pmol). The performance of both media also appeared comparable when analyzing a four-protein mixture. Similar sequence coverage and MASCOT ion scores were observed for all proteins when using either stationary phase. Copyright 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19145579      PMCID: PMC3658454          DOI: 10.1002/rcm.3899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 0951-4198            Impact factor:   2.419


  22 in total

1.  Improved detection of hydrophilic phosphopeptides using graphite powder microcolumns and mass spectrometry: evidence for in vivo doubly phosphorylated dynamin I and dynamin III.

Authors:  Martin R Larsen; Mark E Graham; Phillip J Robinson; Peter Roepstorff
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  The fundamental aspects and applications of Agilent HPLC-Chip.

Authors:  Hongfeng Yin; Kevin Killeen
Journal:  J Sep Sci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.645

3.  Characterization of glycopeptides by combining collision-induced dissociation and electron-transfer dissociation mass spectrometry data.

Authors:  William R Alley; Yehia Mechref; Milos V Novotny
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Structural analysis of sulfated N-linked oligosaccharides in erythropoietin.

Authors:  N Kawasaki; Y Haishima; M Ohta; S Itoh; M Hyuga; S Hyuga; T Hayakawa
Journal:  Glycobiology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.313

5.  Application of liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry to the analysis of the site-specific carbohydrate heterogeneity in erythropoietin.

Authors:  N Kawasaki; M Ohta; S Hyuga; M Hyuga; T Hayakawa
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 3.365

6.  Profiling of glycans in serum for the discovery of potential biomarkers for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Hyun Joo An; Suzanne Miyamoto; Katherine S Lancaster; Crystal Kirmiz; Bensheng Li; Kit S Lam; Gary S Leiserowitz; Carlito B Lebrilla
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  Alterations in the serum glycome due to metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Zuzana Kyselova; Yehia Mechref; Mohammad M Al Bataineh; Lacey E Dobrolecki; Robert J Hickey; Jake Vinson; Christopher J Sweeney; Milos V Novotny
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2007-04-14       Impact factor: 4.466

8.  High-performance liquid chromatography of glycopeptides and oligosaccharides on graphitized carbon columns.

Authors:  J Q Fan; A Kondo; I Kato; Y C Lee
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.365

9.  High-performance liquid chromatography of oligosaccharide alditols and glycopeptides on a graphitized carbon column.

Authors:  M Davies; K D Smith; A M Harbin; E F Hounsell
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1992-09-18

10.  Graphite powder as an alternative or supplement to reversed-phase material for desalting and concentration of peptide mixtures prior to matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Martin R Larsen; Stuart J Cordwell; Peter Roepstorff
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.984

View more
  13 in total

1.  Glycoprotein Enrichment Analytical Techniques: Advantages and Disadvantages.

Authors:  R Zhu; L Zacharias; K M Wooding; W Peng; Y Mechref
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  Analysis of site-specific glycosylation of renal and hepatic γ-glutamyl transpeptidase from normal human tissue.

Authors:  Matthew B West; Zaneer M Segu; Christa L Feasley; Pilsoo Kang; Iveta Klouckova; Chenglong Li; Milos V Novotny; Christopher M West; Yehia Mechref; Marie H Hanigan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Recent advances in the MS analysis of glycoproteins: Theoretical considerations.

Authors:  Iulia M Lazar; Alexandru C Lazar; Diego F Cortes; Jarod L Kabulski
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 4.  Recent advances in the MS analysis of glycoproteins: Capillary and microfluidic workflows.

Authors:  Diego F Cortes; Jarod L Kabulski; Alexandru C Lazar; Iulia M Lazar
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 3.535

5.  Analysis of Glycosaminoglycans Using Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Gregory O Staples; Joseph Zaia
Journal:  Curr Proteomics       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 0.837

Review 6.  A systematic approach to protein glycosylation analysis: a path through the maze.

Authors:  Karina Mariño; Jonathan Bones; Jayesh J Kattla; Pauline M Rudd
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 15.040

Review 7.  Methods for quantification of glycopeptides by liquid separation and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Haidi Yin; Jianhui Zhu
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 9.011

Review 8.  Analytical glycobiology at high sensitivity: current approaches and directions.

Authors:  Milos V Novotny; William R Alley; Benjamin F Mann
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 2.916

9.  Isomeric Separation of N-Glycopeptides Derived from Glycoproteins by Porous Graphitic Carbon (PGC) LC-MS/MS.

Authors:  Rui Zhu; Yifan Huang; Jingfu Zhao; Jieqiang Zhong; Yehia Mechref
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 10.  MS-based glycomics and glycoproteomics methods enabling isomeric characterization.

Authors:  Wenjing Peng; Cristian D Gutierrez Reyes; Sakshi Gautam; Aiying Yu; Byeong Gwan Cho; Mona Goli; Kaitlyn Donohoo; Stefania Mondello; Firas Kobeissy; Yehia Mechref
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 9.011

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.