Literature DB >> 19143412

Cancellous bone screw purchase: a comparison of synthetic femurs, human femurs, and finite element analysis.

R Zdero1, M Olsen, H Bougherara, E H Schemitsch.   

Abstract

Biomechanical assessments of orthopaedic fracture fixation constructs are increasingly using commercially available analogues such as the fourth-generation composite femur (4GCF). The aim of this study was to compare cancellous screw purchase directly between these surrogates and human femurs, which has not been done previously. Synthetic and human femurs each had one orthopaedic cancellous screw (major diameter, 6.5 mm) inserted along the femoral neck axis and into the spongy bone of the femoral head to a depth of 30 mm. Screws were removed to obtain pull-out force, shear stress, and energy values. The three experimental study groups (n = 6 femurs each) were the 4GCF with a 'solid' cancellous matrix, the 4GCF with a 'cellular' cancellous matrix, and human femurs. Moreover, a finite element model was developed on the basis of the material properties and anatomical geometry of the two synthetic femurs in order to assess cancellous screw purchase. The results for force, shear stress, and energy respectively were as follows: 4GCF solid femurs, 926.47 +/- 66.76 N, 2.84 +/- 0.20 MPa, and 0.57 +/- 0.04 J; 4GCF cellular femurs, 1409.64 +/- 133.36 N, 4.31 +/- 0.41 MPa, and 0.99 +/- 0.13 J; human femurs, 1523.29 +/- 1380.15N, 4.66 +/- 4.22 MPa, and 2.78 +/- 3.61J. No statistical differences were noted when comparing the three experimental groups for pull-out force (p = 0.413), shear stress (p = 0.412), or energy (p = 0.185). The 4GCF with either a 'solid' or 'cellular' cancellous matrix is a good biomechanical analogue to the human femur at the screw thread-bone interface. This is the first study to perform a three-way investigation of cancellous screw purchase using 4GCFs, human femurs, and finite element analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19143412     DOI: 10.1243/09544119JEIM409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H        ISSN: 0954-4119            Impact factor:   1.617


  16 in total

1.  Anterior internal fixator versus a femoral distractor and external fixation for sacroiliac joint compression and single stance gait testing: a mechanical study in synthetic bone.

Authors:  Jonathan M Vigdorchik; Amanda O Esquivel; Xin Jin; King H Yang; Rahul Vaidya
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-05-04       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Composite bone models in orthopaedic surgery research and education.

Authors:  John Elfar; Ron Martin Garcia Menorca; Jeffrey Douglas Reed; Spencer Stanbury
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Are quadrilateral surface buttress plates comparable to traditional forms of transverse acetabular fracture fixation?

Authors:  Brian J Kistler; Ian R Smithson; Seth A Cooper; Jacob L Cox; Aniruddh N Nayak; Brandon G Santoni; H Claude Sagi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Resurfacing head size and femoral fracture: Are registry conclusions on head size justified?

Authors:  Adeel Aqil; Anatole Wiik; Susannah Clarke; Milad Masjedi; Justin Cobb
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-09-25

5.  Posterior glenoid wear in total shoulder arthroplasty: eccentric anterior reaming is superior to posterior augment.

Authors:  Tim Wang; Geoffrey D Abrams; Anthony W Behn; Derek Lindsey; Nicholas Giori; Emilie V Cheung
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Embalmed and fresh frozen human bones in orthopedic cadaveric studies: which bone is authentic and feasible?

Authors:  Tobias Topp; Thorben Müller; Sebastian Huss; Peter Herbert Kann; Eberhard Weihe; Steffen Ruchholtz; Ralph Peter Zettl
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Short uncemented stems allow greater femoral flexibility and may reduce peri-prosthetic fracture risk: a dry bone and cadaveric study.

Authors:  Christopher Jones; Adeel Aqil; Susannah Clarke; Justin P Cobb
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2015-02-21

8.  Nailing vs. plating in comminuted proximal ulna fractures - a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Johannes Christof Hopf; Tobias Eckhard Nowak; Dorothea Mehler; Charlotte Arand; Dominik Gruszka; Ruben Westphal; Pol Maria Rommens
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Biomechanical Analysis Using FEA and Experiments of Metal Plate and Bone Strut Repair of a Femur Midshaft Segmental Defect.

Authors:  Jason Coquim; Joseph Clemenzi; Mohsen Salahi; Abdurahman Sherif; Pouria Tavakkoli Avval; Suraj Shah; Emil H Schemitsch; Z Shaghayegh Bagheri; Habiba Bougherara; Radovan Zdero
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Feasibility of a braided composite for orthopedic bone cast.

Authors:  Katherine R Evans; Jason P Carey
Journal:  Open Biomed Eng J       Date:  2013-01-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.