Literature DB >> 19138968

An expanded risk prediction model for lung cancer.

Margaret R Spitz1, Carol J Etzel, Qiong Dong, Christopher I Amos, Qingyi Wei, Xifeng Wu, Waun Ki Hong.   

Abstract

Risk prediction models are useful in clinical decision making. We have published an internally validated prediction tool for lung cancer based on easily obtainable epidemiologic and clinical data. Because the precision of the model was modest, we now estimate the improvement obtained by adding two markers of DNA repair capacity. Assay data (host-cell reactivation and mutagen sensitivity) were available for 725 White lung cancer cases and 615 controls, all former or current smokers, a subset of cases and controls from the previous analysis. Multivariable models were constructed from the original variables with addition of the biomarkers separately and together. Pairwise comparisons of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and 3-fold cross-validations were done. For former smokers, the AUC and 95% confidence intervals were 0.67 (0.63-0.71) for the baseline model and 0.70 (0.66-0.74) for the expanded model. For current smokers, the comparable AUC values were 0.68 (0.64-0.72) and 0.73 (0.69-0.77). For both groups, the expanded models were statistically significantly better than the baseline models (P = 0.006 and P = 0.0048, respectively), although the increases in the concordance statistics were modest. We also recomputed 1-year absolute risks of lung cancer as described previously for two different risk profiles and showed that individuals who exhibited poor repair capacity or heightened mutagen sensitivity had increased absolute risks of lung cancer. Addition of biomarker assays improved the sensitivity of the expanded models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19138968      PMCID: PMC2854404          DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)        ISSN: 1940-6215


  17 in total

Review 1.  Genetic susceptibility to lung cancer: the role of DNA damage and repair.

Authors:  Margaret R Spitz; Qingyi Wei; Qiong Dong; Christopher I Amos; Xifeng Wu
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Sensitivity to genotoxic effects of bleomycin in humans: possible relationship to environmental carcinogenesis.

Authors:  T C Hsu; D A Johnston; L M Cherry; D Ramkissoon; S P Schantz; J M Jessup; R J Winn; L Shirley; C Furlong
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1989-03-15       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Repair of tobacco carcinogen-induced DNA adducts and lung cancer risk: a molecular epidemiologic study.

Authors:  Q Wei; L Cheng; C I Amos; L E Wang; Z Guo; W K Hong; M R Spitz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Harvard report on cancer prevention volume 4: Harvard Cancer Risk Index. Risk Index Working Group, Harvard Center for Cancer Prevention.

Authors:  G A Colditz; K A Atwood; K Emmons; R R Monson; W C Willett; D Trichopoulos; D J Hunter
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Mammographic breast density and the Gail model for breast cancer risk prediction in a screening population.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Tice; Steven R Cummings; Elad Ziv; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Interplay between mutagen sensitivity and epidemiological factors in modulatinglung cancer risk.

Authors:  Xifeng Wu; Jie Lin; Carol J Etzel; Qiong Dong; Olga Y Gorlova; Qing Zhang; Christopher I Amos; Margaret R Spitz
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Variations in lung cancer risk among smokers.

Authors:  Peter B Bach; Michael W Kattan; Mark D Thornquist; Mark G Kris; Ramsey C Tate; Matt J Barnett; Lillian J Hsieh; Colin B Begg
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-03-19       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Inactivation of plasmid reporter gene expression by one benzo(a)pyrene diol-epoxide DNA adduct in adult rat hepatocytes.

Authors:  K S Koch; R G Fletcher; M P Grond; A I Inyang; X P Lu; D A Brenner; H L Leffert
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1993-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Development and field-test validation of an assay for DNA repair in circulating human lymphocytes.

Authors:  W F Athas; M A Hedayati; G M Matanoski; E R Farmer; L Grossman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1991-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  60 in total

Review 1.  Lung cancer screening: past, present and future.

Authors:  James H Finigan; Jeffrey A Kern
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 2.878

Review 2.  Molecular targets for cancer chemoprevention.

Authors:  William N William; John V Heymach; Edward S Kim; Scott M Lippman
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 3.  Screening for lung cancer using low-dose computed tomography: concerns about the application in low-risk individuals.

Authors:  Jiu-Wei Cui; Wei Li; Fu-Jun Han; Yu-Di Liu
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-06

Review 4.  Lung cancer screening-low dose CT for lung cancer screening: recent trial results and next steps.

Authors:  Emma Louise O'Dowd; David R Baldwin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  The BATTLE to personalize lung cancer prevention through reverse migration.

Authors:  Kathryn A Gold; Edward S Kim; J Jack Lee; Ignacio I Wistuba; Carol J Farhangfar; Waun Ki Hong
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-07

6.  Prediction of lung cancer incidence on the low-dose computed tomography arm of the National Lung Screening Trial: A dynamic Bayesian network.

Authors:  Panayiotis Petousis; Simon X Han; Denise Aberle; Alex A T Bui
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 5.326

7.  Predictive Accuracy of the PanCan Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Model -External Validation based on CT from the Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  Mathilde M Winkler Wille; Sarah J van Riel; Zaigham Saghir; Asger Dirksen; Jesper Holst Pedersen; Colin Jacobs; Laura Hohwü Thomsen; Ernst Th Scholten; Lene T Skovgaard; Bram van Ginneken
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Selection criteria for lung-cancer screening.

Authors:  Martin C Tammemägi; Hormuzd A Katki; William G Hocking; Timothy R Church; Neil Caporaso; Paul A Kvale; Anil K Chaturvedi; Gerard A Silvestri; Tom L Riley; John Commins; Christine D Berg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Pharmacogenomics of platinum-based chemotherapy in NSCLC.

Authors:  Michelle A T Hildebrandt; Jian Gu; Xifeng Wu
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.481

10.  The potential for using risk models in future lung cancer screening trials.

Authors:  John K Field; Olaide Y Raji
Journal:  F1000 Med Rep       Date:  2010-05-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.