Literature DB >> 2466800

Sensitivity to genotoxic effects of bleomycin in humans: possible relationship to environmental carcinogenesis.

T C Hsu1, D A Johnston, L M Cherry, D Ramkissoon, S P Schantz, J M Jessup, R J Winn, L Shirley, C Furlong.   

Abstract

Responses to the genotoxic effect of bleomycin in lymphocytes of blood cultures, expressed as the average number of chromatid breaks per cell (b/c), varied from less than 0.20 to more than 2.00 in 335 normal individuals. More than 11% of the subjects tested showed a b/c rate above 1.00 and more than 22% showed a b/c rate above 0.80. These individuals are considered sensitive to this radiomimetic drug. The distributional profile of bleomycin responses of the control individuals appears to be representative of the normal human population. In patients with cancers of the colon (83), upper aerodigestive tract (head/neck) (77), and lung (71), the frequencies of subjects in the hypersensitive class were found to be between 40 and 50%, and the response profiles were distinctly different from those of the control population. On the other hand, in a group of elderly cigarette smokers, who exhibited no symptoms of lung cancer, the bleomycin sensitivity profile was significantly skewed toward the more resistant stratum, with only one hypersensitive case among 56 individuals tested (1.78%). The sensitivity profile of patients with breast cancer (82) was similar to that of the control population. Our data suggest that: (1) mutagen sensitivity may play an important role in carcinogenesis of organs and tissues that have direct contact with the external environment (respiratory, digestive, and integumentary systems); (2) it appears to have no significant influence on carcinogenesis of tissues that are not directly exposed to the environment (e.g., breast, brain); and (3) it also has little impact on carcinogenesis in individuals with a hereditary predisposition to cancer (e.g., retinoblastoma, Gardner's syndrome). Development of more effective and precise test systems for carcinogen sensitivity is highly desirable for identification of persons at risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2466800     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910430310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  40 in total

1.  Prospective analysis of DNA damage and repair markers of lung cancer risk from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  Alice J Sigurdson; Irene M Jones; Qingyi Wei; Xifeng Wu; Margaret R Spitz; Douglas A Stram; Myron D Gross; Wen-Yi Huang; Li-E Wang; Jian Gu; Cynthia B Thomas; Douglas J Reding; Richard B Hayes; Neil E Caporaso
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.944

2.  Less efficient g2-m checkpoint is associated with an increased risk of lung cancer in African Americans.

Authors:  Yun-Ling Zheng; Christopher A Loffredo; Anthony J Alberg; Zhipeng Yu; Raymond T Jones; Donna Perlmutter; Lindsey Enewold; Mark J Krasna; Rex Yung; Peter G Shields; Curtis C Harris
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Double-strand break damage and associated DNA repair genes predispose smokers to gene methylation.

Authors:  Shuguang Leng; Christine A Stidley; Randy Willink; Amanda Bernauer; Kieu Do; Maria A Picchi; Xin Sheng; Melissa A Frasco; David Van Den Berg; Frank D Gilliland; Christopher Zima; Richard E Crowell; Steven A Belinsky
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Gamma-ray-induced mutagen sensitivity and risk of sporadic breast cancer in young women: a case-control study.

Authors:  Li-E Wang; Chan H Han; Ping Xiong; Melissa L Bondy; Tse-Kuan Yu; Abenaa M Brewster; Sanjay Shete; Banu K Arun; Thomas A Buchholz; Qingyi Wei
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Cytogenetic characterization of 20 lymphoblastoid lines derived from human individuals differing in bleomycin sensitivity.

Authors:  T C Hsu; E J Shillitoe; L M Cherry; Q Lin; S P Schantz; C Furlong
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol       Date:  1990-01

Review 6.  Biologic markers, cellular differentiation, and metastatic head and neck cancer.

Authors:  S P Schantz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Gamma-radiation sensitivity and polymorphisms in RAD51L1 modulate glioma risk.

Authors:  Yanhong Liu; Sanjay Shete; Li-E Wang; Randa El-Zein; Carol J Etzel; Fu-Wen Liang; Georgina Armstrong; Spyros Tsavachidis; Mark R Gilbert; Kenneth D Aldape; Jinliang Xing; Xifeng Wu; Qingyi Wei; Melissa L Bondy
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 8.  The evolving discipline of molecular epidemiology of cancer.

Authors:  Margaret R Spitz; Melissa L Bondy
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 4.944

9.  Assessment of individual susceptibility to baseline DNA and cytogenetic damage in a healthy Turkish population: evaluation with lifestyle factors.

Authors:  Ela Kadioglu; Neslihan Aygun Kocabas; Gonca Cakmak Demircigil; Erdem Coskun; Eren Ozcagli; Emre Durmaz; Bensu Karahalil; Sema Burgaz; Semra Sardas
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2012-08-20

10.  [Methylnitrosourea as challenge mutagen in assessment of the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) activity: association with some types of cancer].

Authors:  V A Tronov; M Iu Loginova; I I Kramarenko
Journal:  Genetika       Date:  2008-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.