Q Wei1, L Cheng, C I Amos, L E Wang, Z Guo, W K Hong, M R Spitz. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Division of Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. qwei@mdanderson.org
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Only a fraction of cigarette smokers develop lung cancer, suggesting that people differ in their susceptibility to this disease. We investigated whether differences in DNA repair capacity (DRC) for repairing tobacco carcinogen-induced DNA damage are associated with differential susceptibility to lung cancer. METHODS: From August 1, 1995, through April 30, 1999, we conducted a hospital-based, case-control study of 316 newly diagnosed lung cancer patients and 316 cancer-free control subjects matched on age, sex, and smoking status. DRC was measured in cultured lymphocytes with the use of the host-cell reactivation assay with a reporter gene damaged by a known activated tobacco carcinogen, benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide. Statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Overall, lower DRC was observed in case patients than in control subjects (P:<.001) and was associated with a greater than twofold increased risk of lung cancer. Compared with the highest DRC quartile in the control subjects and after adjustment for age, sex, pack-years of smoking, family history of cancer, and other covariates, reduced DRC was associated with increased risk of lung cancer in a dose-dependent fashion (odds ratio [OR] = 1.8 with 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1-3.1, OR = 2.0 with 95% CI = 1.2-3.4, and OR = 4. 3 with 95% CI = 2.6-7.2 for the second, third, and fourth quartiles, respectively; P:(trend)<.001). Case patients who were younger at diagnosis (<60 years old), female, or lighter smokers or who reported a family history of cancer exhibited the lowest DRC and the highest lung cancer risk among their subgroups, suggesting that these subgroups may be especially susceptible to lung cancer. CONCLUSION: The results provide evidence that low DRC is associated with increased risk of lung cancer. The findings from this hospital-based, case-control study should be validated in prospective studies.
BACKGROUND: Only a fraction of cigarette smokers develop lung cancer, suggesting that people differ in their susceptibility to this disease. We investigated whether differences in DNA repair capacity (DRC) for repairing tobacco carcinogen-induced DNA damage are associated with differential susceptibility to lung cancer. METHODS: From August 1, 1995, through April 30, 1999, we conducted a hospital-based, case-control study of 316 newly diagnosed lung cancerpatients and 316 cancer-free control subjects matched on age, sex, and smoking status. DRC was measured in cultured lymphocytes with the use of the host-cell reactivation assay with a reporter gene damaged by a known activated tobacco carcinogen, benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide. Statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Overall, lower DRC was observed in case patients than in control subjects (P:<.001) and was associated with a greater than twofold increased risk of lung cancer. Compared with the highest DRC quartile in the control subjects and after adjustment for age, sex, pack-years of smoking, family history of cancer, and other covariates, reduced DRC was associated with increased risk of lung cancer in a dose-dependent fashion (odds ratio [OR] = 1.8 with 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1-3.1, OR = 2.0 with 95% CI = 1.2-3.4, and OR = 4. 3 with 95% CI = 2.6-7.2 for the second, third, and fourth quartiles, respectively; P:(trend)<.001). Case patients who were younger at diagnosis (<60 years old), female, or lighter smokers or who reported a family history of cancer exhibited the lowest DRC and the highest lung cancer risk among their subgroups, suggesting that these subgroups may be especially susceptible to lung cancer. CONCLUSION: The results provide evidence that low DRC is associated with increased risk of lung cancer. The findings from this hospital-based, case-control study should be validated in prospective studies.
Authors: Alice J Sigurdson; Irene M Jones; Qingyi Wei; Xifeng Wu; Margaret R Spitz; Douglas A Stram; Myron D Gross; Wen-Yi Huang; Li-E Wang; Jian Gu; Cynthia B Thomas; Douglas J Reding; Richard B Hayes; Neil E Caporaso Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2010-10-07 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Yun-Ling Zheng; Christopher A Loffredo; Anthony J Alberg; Zhipeng Yu; Raymond T Jones; Donna Perlmutter; Lindsey Enewold; Mark J Krasna; Rex Yung; Peter G Shields; Curtis C Harris Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-10-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: O Kosti; L Goldman; D T Saha; R A Orden; A J Pollock; H L Madej; A W Hsing; L W Chu; J H Lynch; R Goldman Journal: Mutat Res Date: 2010-11-21 Impact factor: 2.433