Literature DB >> 11774270

Large-scale randomized prostate cancer screening trials: program performances in the European Randomized Screening for Prostate Cancer trial and the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovary cancer trial.

Harry J de Koning1, Anssi Auvinen, Antonio Berenguer Sanchez, Fernando Calais da Silva, Stefano Ciatto, Louis Denis, John K Gohagan, Matti Hakama, Jonas Hugosson, Ries Kranse, Vera Nelen, Philip C Prorok, Fritz H Schröder.   

Abstract

Two large-scale randomized screening trials, the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovary (PLCO) cancer trial in the USA and the European Randomized Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) trial in Europe are currently under way, aimed at assessing whether screening reduces prostate cancer mortality. Up to the end of 1998, 102,691 men have been randomized to the intervention arm and 115,322 to the control arm (which represents 83% of the target sample size) from 7 European countries and 10 screening centers in the USA. The principal screening method at all centers is determination of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA). The PLCO trial and some European centers use also digital rectal examination (DRE) as an ancillary screening test. In the core age group (55-69 years), 3,362 of 32,486 men screened (10%) had a serum PSA concentration of 4 ng/ml or greater, which is 1 cut-off for biopsy (performed in 84%). An additional 6% was referred for further assessment based on other criteria, with much less efficiency. Differences in PSA by country are largely attributable to the age structure of the study population. The mean age-specific PSA levels are lower in the PLCO trial (1.64 ng/ml [in the age group 55-59 years], 1.80 [60-64 years] and 2.18 [65-69 years) than in the ERSPC trial (1.28-1.71 [55-59], 1.75-2.87 [60-64] and 2.48-3.06 [65-69 years]). Detection rates at the first screen in the ERSPC trial range from 11 to 42/1,000 men screened and reflect underlying differences in incidence rates and screening procedures. In centers with consent to randomization design, adherence in the screening arm is 91%, but less than half of the men in the target population are enrolled in the trial. In population-based centers in which men were randomized prior to consent, all eligible subjects are enrolled, but only about two-thirds of the men in the intervention arm undergo screening. Considerable progress has been made in both trials. Enrollment will be completed in 2001. A substantial number of early prostate cancers have been detected. The differences between countries seem to reflect both underlying prostate cancer incidence and screening policy. The trials have the power to show definitive results in 2005-2008. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11774270     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.1588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  32 in total

1.  Priorities in future research in prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Fritz H Schröder
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  [Epidemiology of prostate cancer].

Authors:  N Becker
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Do Men Receive Information Required for Shared Decision Making About PSA Testing? Results from a National Survey.

Authors:  Bryan Leyva; Alexander Persoskie; Allison Ottenbacher; Jada G Hamilton; Jennifer D Allen; Sarah C Kobrin; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Sensitivity study and optimization of a 3D electric impedance tomography prostate probe.

Authors:  A Borsic; R Halter; Y Wan; A Hartov; K D Paulsen
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 2.833

5.  Are biomarkers evaluated in biopsy specimens predictive of prostate cancer aggressiveness?

Authors:  Francesca Carozzi; Lara Tamburrino; Simonetta Bisanzi; Sara Marchiani; Milena Paglierani; Simonetta Di Lollo; Emanuele Crocetti; Carlotta Buzzoni; Elena Burroni; Luana Greco; Elisabetta Baldi; Cristina Sani
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Quantifying the role of PSA screening in the US prostate cancer mortality decline.

Authors:  Ruth Etzioni; Alex Tsodikov; Angela Mariotto; Aniko Szabo; Seth Falcon; Jake Wegelin; Dante DiTommaso; Kent Karnofski; Roman Gulati; David F Penson; Eric Feuer
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Detection of prostate cancer in unselected young men: prospective cohort nested within a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  J Athene Lane; Joanne Howson; Jenny L Donovan; John R Goepel; Daniel J Dedman; Liz Down; Emma L Turner; David E Neal; Freddie C Hamdy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-11-15

8.  Prostate-cancer mortality in the USA and UK in 1975-2004: an ecological study.

Authors:  Simon M Collin; Richard M Martin; Chris Metcalfe; David Gunnell; Peter C Albertsen; David Neal; Freddie Hamdy; Peter Stephens; J Athene Lane; Rollo Moore; Jenny Donovan
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Does educational printed material manage to change compliance with prostate cancer screening?

Authors:  Konstantinos Stamatiou; Andreas Skolarikos; Ioannis Heretis; Vaios Papadimitriou; Alevizos Alevizos; Georgios Ilias; Vasilissa Karanasiou; Anargiros Mariolis; Frank Sofras
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Prostate specific antigen for early detection of prostate cancer: longitudinal study.

Authors:  Benny Holmström; Mattias Johansson; Anders Bergh; Ulf-Håkan Stenman; Göran Hallmans; Pär Stattin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-09-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.