Literature DB >> 19131498

Detection of coronary artery disease with perfusion stress echocardiography using a novel ultrasound imaging agent: two Phase 3 international trials in comparison with radionuclide perfusion imaging.

Roxy Senior1, Mark Monaghan, Michael L Main, Jose L Zamorano, Klaus Tiemann, Luciano Agati, Neil J Weissman, Allan L Klein, Thomas H Marwick, Masood Ahmad, Anthony N DeMaria, Miguel Zabalgoitia, Harald Becher, Sanjiv Kaul, James E Udelson, Frans J Wackers, Richard C Walovitch, Michael H Picard.   

Abstract

AIMS: To determine if perfusion stress echocardiography (PSE) with Imagify (perflubutane polymer microspheres) is comparable to stress perfusion imaging using (99m)Tc single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for coronary artery disease (CAD) detection. PSE is a novel technique for evaluating myocardial perfusion. RAMP (real-time assessment of myocardial perfusion)-1 and -2 were international, Phase 3 trials that evaluated the ability of PSE with Imagify, to detect CAD. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Chronic, stable, chest pain patients (n=662) underwent Imagify PSE and gated SPECT imaging at rest and during dipyridamole stress. Independent blinded cardiologists [three PSE readers per trial, and four SPECT readers (one for RAMP-1, three for RAMP-2)] interpreted images. CAD was defined by quantitative coronary angiography or 90-day outcome with clinical review. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were evaluated using non-inferiority analysis (one-sided alpha=0.025) compared with SPECT. SPECT results for RAMP-1 and -2 were: accuracy (70%, 67%), sensitivity (78%, 61%), and specificity (64%, 76%). Accuracy of all six PSE readers was non-inferior to SPECT (66-71%, P<or=0.004). Four demonstrated non-inferior sensitivity (68-77%, P<or=0.002), three demonstrated non-inferior specificity (72-88%, P<or=0.013). Three PSE readers (RAMP-2) were superior for sensitivity. Two PSE readers (RAMP-1) were superior for specificity. Area under the multi-reader receiver operating characteristics curve (0.72) was equal for both modalities. Majority of adverse events followed dipyridamole dosing, and were mild, transient, and required no treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Imagify PSE was well-tolerated. Its diagnostic performance in chest pain patients is comparable with SPECT perfusion imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19131498     DOI: 10.1093/ejechocard/jen321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr        ISSN: 1532-2114


  15 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of perfusion using ultrasound.

Authors:  David Cosgrove; Nathalie Lassau
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Clinical application and laboratory protocols for performing contrast echocardiography.

Authors:  Adrian Chong; Brian Haluska; Sudhir Wahi
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2013-04-06

Review 3.  Characterization of the rdar morphotype, a multicellular behaviour in Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  U Römling
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 4.  Ninth annual Mario S. Verani memorial lecture : testing our tests: the evidence bar is rising. Regulatory considerations in the development of cardiac imaging agents.

Authors:  James E Udelson
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Rupture threshold characterization of polymer-shelled ultrasound contrast agents subjected to static overpressure.

Authors:  Parag V Chitnis; Paul Lee; Jonathan Mamou; John S Allen; Marcel Böhmer; Jeffrey A Ketterling
Journal:  J Appl Phys       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 6.  Contrast echocardiography: latest developments and clinical utility.

Authors:  Thomas R Porter; Feng Xie
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  [Echocardiography : Important diagnostic pillar in cardiology].

Authors:  R Erbel
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 8.  Contrast echocardiography for detection of myocardial perfusion abnormalities : A clinical perspective.

Authors:  N Karogiannis; R Senior
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.443

9.  Direct myocardial ischemia imaging with exercise ¹⁸FDG.

Authors:  Diwakar Jain; Zuo-Xiang He
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  A novel method for quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography in mice.

Authors:  E Alvarez; N D Dalton; Y Gu; D Smith; A Luong; M Hoshijima; K L Peterson; J Rychak
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.733

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.