Literature DB >> 18165404

The role of apical vaginal support in the appearance of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse.

Jerry L Lowder1, Amy J Park, Rennique Ellison, Chiara Ghetti, Pamela Moalli, Halina Zyczynski, Anne M Weber.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe how simulated apical support affects the appearance of prolapse in the anterior and posterior vagina using a modification of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) examination.
METHODS: Women with prolapse stage II or greater were examined using the POP-Q. To simulate apical support, the posterior blade of a standard Graves speculum was positioned over the posterior vagina to support the vaginal apex while remeasuring points Aa and Ba and over the anterior vagina to support the apex while remeasuring points Ap and Bp. Change in anterior and posterior POP-Q points and prolapse stage with apical support were calculated.
RESULTS: One hundred ninety-seven women were enrolled with mean age of 62+/-14 years, median parity of 2 (range 0-8), and mean body mass index of 28+/-5 kg/m(2). By standard POP-Q, 36% had stage II prolapse, 54% had stage III, and 10% had stage IV prolapse. With simulated apical support, point Ba changed to stage 0 or I in 55% of cases and point Bp changed to stage 0 or I in 30% (P<.001 for each point). Mean change for point Ba with apical support was 3.5+/-2.6 cm and point Bp was 1.9+/-2.9 cm (P<.001).
CONCLUSION: When the POP-Q examination is performed with simulated apical support, the critical role of level I vaginal support on the position of the anterior and posterior vagina, particularly the anterior vagina, becomes apparent. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18165404     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000297309.25091.a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  36 in total

1.  Concomitant apical suspensory procedures in women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse in the United States in 2011.

Authors:  Gina M Northington; Catherine O Hudson; Deborah R Karp; Sarah A Huber
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Female pelvic floor biomechanics: bridging the gap.

Authors:  Deanna C Easley; Steven D Abramowitch; Pamela A Moalli
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 3.  Robotic Sacrocolpopexy-Is It the Treatment of Choice for Advanced Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse?

Authors:  Janine L Oliver; Ja-Hong Kim
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Utilization of apical vaginal support procedures at time of inpatient hysterectomy performed for benign conditions: a national estimate.

Authors:  Whitney Trotter Ross; Melanie R Meister; Jonathan P Shepherd; Margaret A Olsen; Jerry L Lowder
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Minimal mesh repair for apical and anterior prolapse: initial anatomical and subjective outcomes.

Authors:  Manhan K Vu; Juraj Letko; Kelly Jirschele; Adam Gafni-Kane; Aimee Nguyen; Honyan Du; Roger P Goldberg
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Operations and pelvic muscle training in the management of apical support loss (OPTIMAL) trial: design and methods.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Linda Brubaker; Shawn Menefee; Peggy Norton; Diane Borello-France; Edward Varner; Joseph Schaffer; Alison Weidner; Xiao Xu; Cathie Spino; Anne Weber
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  Structural, functional, and symptomatic differences between women with rectocele versus cystocele and normal support.

Authors:  Mitchell B Berger; Giselle E Kolenic; Dee E Fenner; Daniel M Morgan; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Anatomic outcomes of abdominal sacrocolpopexy with or without paravaginal repair.

Authors:  Stuart H Shippey; Lieschen H Quiroz; Tatiana V D Sanses; Leise R Knoepp; Geoffrey W Cundiff; Victoria L Handa
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Complications of transvaginal monofilament polypropylene mesh in pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Authors:  Farnaz A Ganj; Okechukwu A Ibeanu; Ahmet Bedestani; Thomas E Nolan; Ralph R Chesson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-04-07

10.  Does trocar-guided tension-free vaginal mesh (Prolift) repair provoke prolapse of the unaffected compartments?

Authors:  Mariëlla I J Withagen; Mark E Vierhout; Alfredo L Milani
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.