Literature DB >> 19129977

Potential impact of enhanced practice efficiency on endoscopy waiting times.

G C Harewood1, H Ryan, F Murray, S Patchett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the growing demand on endoscopy services, optimising practice efficiency has assumed increasing importance. Prior research has identified practice changes, which increase the efficiency in endoscopy. In this study, the potential impact of these practice changes on the current and projected future endoscopy waiting times at our institution was assessed.
METHODS: The annual volume of endoscopic procedures performed at a major teaching hospital and the annual procedure demand from 2000 to 2007 were reviewed. Procedure demand and waiting times were projected until 2012. The impact of three practice changes, which have been shown to increase efficiency was assessed: 1. routinely obtaining i.v. access and consent in patients prior to endoscopy (approach 1); 2. routinely obtaining i.v. access and consent, and sedating the patient prior to endoscopy (approach 2); 3. utilizing a two-room per endoscopist model (approach 3).
RESULTS: There has been a significant increase in annual procedure volume (36%) and annual procedure demand (69%) from 2000 to 2007. Annual waiting times for routine procedures have lengthened, from 6 weeks (2000) to 22 weeks (2007). Assuming continued linear growth in demand up to 2012, the projected waiting times will continue to rise reaching 40 weeks in 2012. Routinely obtaining i.v. access/consent prior to procedure (approach 1) would shorten the average routine waiting times so that 8 weeks (recommended HSE maximum) would not be exceeded until early 2006; routinely obtaining i.v. access/consent and sedating patient prior to procedure (approach 2) would shorten the average routine waiting time so that 8 weeks would not be exceeded until 2008; utilising two rooms per endoscopist (approach 3) would shorten the average routine waiting time so that 8 weeks would not be exceeded until early 2012.
CONCLUSIONS: Maintaining timely access to endoscopic services is becoming more challenging in the face of growing demand. Modifications in routine clinical practice can significantly impact procedure waiting times. In an era where economic aspects of medical care are becoming increasingly important and where there is growing focus on waiting times as a measure of clinical performance, these findings underscore the importance of providing clinical care in the most efficient manner possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19129977     DOI: 10.1007/s11845-008-0271-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  8 in total

1.  Trends in colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips; Su-Ying Liang; Uri Ladabaum; Jennifer Haas; Karla Kerlikowske; David Lieberman; Robert Hiatt; Mika Nagamine; Stephanie L Van Bebber
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Changing trends in the management of colorectal cancers and its impact on cancer waiting times.

Authors:  D Raje; S La Touche; H Mukhtar; A Oshowo; C Ingham Clark
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Waiting times for colonoscopy and colorectal cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Charlie H Viiala; Kevin W Tang; Ian C Lawrance; Kevin Murray; John K Olynyk
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 7.738

4.  Effect of Medicare coverage on use of invasive colorectal cancer screening tests.

Authors:  Cynthia W Ko; William Kreuter; Laura-Mae Baldwin
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002 Dec 9-23

5.  Wait time for endoscopic evaluation at a Canadian tertiary care centre: comparison with Canadian Association of Gastroenterology targets.

Authors:  Derek Yu; Wilma M Hopman; William G Paterson
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.522

6.  'Paper Clinics'- a model for improving delivery of outpatient colorectal services.

Authors:  T R C Porrett; P J Lunniss
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.788

7.  A "time-and-motion" study of endoscopic practice: strategies to enhance efficiency.

Authors:  Gavin C Harewood; Kristia Chrysostomou; Naila Himy; Wai Ling Leong
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  An initial investigation of efficiency in endoscopy delivery.

Authors:  Saeed Zamir; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 10.864

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Utilization of resource leveling to optimize ERCP efficiency.

Authors:  L M Hendrick; G C Harewood; S E Patchett; F E Murray
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Discovering the impact of preceding units' characteristics on the wait time of cardiac surgery unit from statistic data.

Authors:  Jiming Liu; Li Tao; Bo Xiao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Can Simple Tests Prior to Endoscopy Predict the OLGA Stage of Gastritis?

Authors:  Ertan Bulbuloglu; Hasan Dagmura; Emin Daldal; Alev Deresoy; Huseyin Bakir; Ugur Ozsoy; Ali Ihsan Saglam; Osman Demir
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-24

4.  A Patient Flow Analysis: Identification of Process Inefficiencies and Workflow Metrics at an Ambulatory Endoscopy Unit.

Authors:  Rowena Almeida; William G Paterson; Nancy Craig; Lawrence Hookey
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-03-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.